Look at this neat cell-phone the new guy gave me. Wonder where he is, he said to wait by the car and turn it on at 3PM and he would call me, ....
Ideally, yes. But the question still has to be asked doesn't it? Because what it boils down to, I believe, is the difference between intervention and interference.
I see it as analogous to this. If you or I walk into our neighbours home and begin to dictate how they conduct their lives, that's interference. But if our neighbour beats his wife and we report him or give shelter to the abused spouse that's intervention. In either scenario, it's really not our business what goes on in our neighbour's home but there may be certain times/situations when we should make it our business.
Not to say that looking at things on an international scale is this simple, it's not. And that's not even to say that intervention is always the best course of action. But I think the same principles are there and the issues need to be addressed.
Are you suggesting Israel is getting into the energy business to use all that product at home. If you want to see how they missed out draw the line as an extension of the border on the land and include Gaza according to the map of 1947. A land with no people is not a reference to 100 miles of ocean. Israel is trying to get in through Cyprus and it's customers are Europe, starting in Syria means the mineral rights pretty much eliminate Lebanon from being a major player and the ports in Syria could pipe oil from Iraq to supply whomever, at a profit due to who runs the port.Okay... so where in that map does it imply the need for a pipeline through Syria?
The West better rethink deploying armed persons when this is their version of a Hummer. Notice the whole undercarriage fits the specs of the carriers for S-400 arms and a lot of other modules that be swapped out in about 30 minutes in theater. Bet you already guessed the troop modules come with troops inside and it fits the new air transport. The civilian version is a trip for 30 that goes over Niagara, once an hour every hour.Maybe you should reevaluate your stand on the benevolent west.
Well kinda hard to find Syrian ones eh.:smile:I guess it would be useless to point out that these vids are either NATO or Israeli tests. The air/fuel one is very similar to the first big blast that was near Damascus that included several of the same unique elements of that explosion.
Remember that 'accident' that was reported in Iran a few months back, about a military base that was flattened, now you know what was used.
Why would you need atomic weapons when this appears to be quite capable of making parking lots?
Meaning Syria is incapable of letting any go off. I agree.Well kinda hard to find Syrian ones eh.:smile:
The Syrians are more than capable of building these.Meaning Syria is incapable of letting any go off. I agree.
Breaking News : Israeli Airstrike against Military Site on the outskirts of Damascus (May 05, 2013) - YouTube
You said it yourself, cutting edge technology. Damascus doesn't have these thing, if they did the rebels would be getting tagged with them. It would appear that you need a directed energy explosion to vaporize the fuel first and I doubt is not anything below aviation gas specs.Many may not be familiar with these types of bombs.
Then you must have some link that verifies they have them, Iran is just starting to explore their uses in a conventional war.The Syrians are more than capable of building these.
You said it yourself, cutting edge technology. Damascus doesn't have these thing, if they did the rebels would be getting tagged with them. It would appear that you need a directed energy explosion to vaporize the fuel first and I doubt is not anything below aviation gas specs.
Then you must have some link that verifies they have them, Iran is just starting to explore their uses in a conventional war.
The theory behind directed charges was known at the end of WWII, it took some decades before they were effective field devices. Like the magnetic ones used by Israel to eliminate Iranian scientists while in their cars. The deliver device is state of the art, Syria doesn't have those or use them at this level of hostilities. Russian troops would have them as a standard weapon and in large numbers if they were needed. Napalm was cutting edge at the end of WWII.FAE are child's play.
Or a Neutron Bomb.The theory behind directed charges was known at the end of WWII, it took some decades before they were effective field devices. Like the magnetic ones used by Israel to eliminate Iranian scientists while in their cars. The deliver device is state of the art, Syria doesn't have those or use them at this level of hostilities. Russian troops would have them as a standard weapon and in large numbers if they were needed. Napalm was cutting edge at the end of WWII.
Cutting edge of tomorrow would be an emp burst using conventional materials so the land is useful after life returns to it.
They probably have all sorts of things that make people go 'wow'. Someday perhaps they will clue in that you can get things done withou having to kill everybody first. lol