Resigning would be an abandonment of her duties?
Gun nut needs to give his head a shake.
The Harper government passed a measure 13 years ago to catch Liberal scandals. It wor
- Thread starter Colpy
- Start date
Gun nut needs to give his head a shake.
And the same sides that were infighting during those years are at it again . The Quebec machine usually comes out ahead and currently appear to be firmly in the drivers seat again . However Martin did briefly wrest power from the Cretienites but by that time the liberal brand was so tarnished he couldn’t accomplish much other then ignominious defeat . We shall see what comes down this time around .I am hoping for another ignominious defeat .
Listen you phucking moron, if I want an opinion from someone with your intellectual capabilities, I'll ask my cocker spaniel
On an "Indian" woman?
You are such a phucking moron you can't even keep up with the PC language policies of your own political philosophy (which appears to be a unique brand I would name Liberally Stupid).
Have yourself whipped.
And no, you're not allowed to enjoy it.
What better time to catch the company in the act, . . . Right? 2004 was when Harper became the party leader. That is what is being tried right now, catching the Liberals doing something wrong, would have worked better but the company was still useful to the World Bank before the destruction of Libya was underway.
You would think the lobby for immunity from being banned from bidding in Canada would have started sooner than 2015.
Why is it that so many liberal and democrat politicians habitually are found to be filling their pockets ? Do you require examples ?
If the will of the Liberal government is to allow SNC Lavelin to be let off after they kill people (preferably Conservatives) would you not see this as a way for the Liberals to get money?
This is what is sooooo idiotic and destructive in "progressive" philosophy.
Selfishness is a basic human trait, part of human nature.
Collectivism (radical socialism) refuses to recognize it as such. Therefore the most greedy and vicious rise to the top (Mao, Stalin, Maduro, Chavez, Pol Pot, etc.) and yet normal self interest has to be beaten out of the population at large.
I'm simplifying way too much, but essentially this is why all radically collectivist societies wind up like Venezuela.
Capitalism, on the other hand, is realistic about human nature, and build societies that work.
Last edited:
Spoken like a good little communist. In our democratic system MPs are elected to carry out the will of the people, not the party.If they are not prepared to put the people before the party they do not belong in cabinet.
The job of cabinet is to carry out the will of the government.
If you are unable to do that it is up to you to inform the government and step aside so that they can put someone else in that position who will carry out their plans.
This is how a parliamentary democracy is supposed to work.