Thanks LBGTQ Community
- Thread starter Hoof Hearted
- Start date
Our whole society is one big straight parade. TV, movies, popular culture, are all about straight relationships, straight pursuits, straight conquests. So much so that the microscopic fraction of gay relationships you see in popular culture, usually presented en passant, stand out so much to you.
But you're pleased by women nearly or totally naked in public.
Yep. It wasn't gays arrested for f*cking like bunnies in St. Patrick's cathedral.
I guess that pair is typical of all straights.
You daughter's feelings are understandable and I wouldn't change them. As she gets older she'll understand that the world is comprised of all sorts of critters who have just as valid a reason as anyone else for occupying the planet. Rainbows in any form are acceptable but who needs the "pointed symbolism"?
Not if you listen to C.B.C. radio 7 days a week!
Makes sense for advertisers to play to the gallery, some alternate theme relationships get air time but things just carry on with most everyone unconcerned about what turns the homosexual crank. I can understand the frustration however vieing to shove queer ideals down contented folks throats is bound to meet some resistance. Live and let live is a neat motto n' if the queer lobby would preach less about hate and more on real inclusiveness str8s could stop feeling guilty about their nonchalance.
Exactly. Granted not my cup of tea, as it were, but then I really don't like the parades overmuch.
But having a 300lb guy in a speedo shaking his bits about - I've seen straight guys do it, so what's wrong with gay guys doing so?
When gays do it, it's perversion. When straights do it, it's boys being boys.
Which is pretty much the definition of "privilege."
do tell...
Clothing laws by country
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Clothing laws vary considerably around the world. In general, in most countries, there are no laws which prescribe what clothing is required to be worn. However, the community standards of clothing are set indirectly by way of prosecution of those who wear something that is not socially approved.
Those people who wear insufficient clothing can be prosecuted in many countries under various offences termed indecent exposure, public indecency or other descriptions. Generally, these offences do not themselves define what is and what is not acceptable clothing to constitute the offence, and leave it to a judge to determine in each case.
United States[edit]
A variety of different offenses, such as "indecent exposure", "public lewdness", "public indecency", "disorderly conduct" and so on, may involve exposure of a specific body part (genitals, buttocks, anus, nipples on women), a specific intention or effect (being sexually suggestive, offending or annoying observers). In some cases, a member of the opposite sex must be present. In Florida, designated nudity areas are given an explicit exception.
There are also some specific prohibitions against sexual acts, such as having sexual intercourse in public, or publicly caressing someone in a sexual way. In Indiana and Tennessee, there are specific prohibitions against showing a noticeably erect penis through clothing, or other sensitive areas through semi-transparent clothing.
In some states, indecent conduct can also occur on private property, depending on the intent or effect of the act. In some cases there are exceptions for spouses, breastfeeding, and in New York, theatre performances.
In most states, there is a governing state statute which defines the offense; in Maryland and Massachusetts, indecency is defined by case law.[20] Some local (county and municipal) governments also regulate personal exposure, as well as commercial activities such as strip clubs.
Case law in general governs the interpretation of the statutory definition, and in some cases allows for additional exceptions.[21][22]
In general, exposure of the head, upper chest, and limbs is legal, and considered socially acceptable except among certain religious communities.
Federal, state, and local regulations for certain occupations require various pieces of protective clothing for the safety of the wearer. Such items include hard hats, safety vests, life jackets, aprons, hairnets, and steel-toe boots.
In the first decade of the twenty-first century there was some controversy in some southern U.S. states over the wearing of trousers so low as to expose the underwear (sagging). The practice was banned in some places.
Some states and towns have loose, or no, regulations for requiring clothing. The city of San Francisco has a history of public nudity, including at public events such as Bay to Breakers. The town of Brattleboro, VT experienced a brief period during which there was public nudity, until a law was passed banning it.[23]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clothing_laws_by_country
It's always good to get the legal information first before having a silly opinion
This business of letting messed up growm men in the little girls bathroom is sick as it gets,
and is designed to be just that - to keep people from focusing on the ongoing COMMUNIST revolution paid for by George Soros and his ILLk.
Clothing laws by country
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Clothing laws vary considerably around the world. In general, in most countries, there are no laws which prescribe what clothing is required to be worn. However, the community standards of clothing are set indirectly by way of prosecution of those who wear something that is not socially approved.
Those people who wear insufficient clothing can be prosecuted in many countries under various offences termed indecent exposure, public indecency or other descriptions. Generally, these offences do not themselves define what is and what is not acceptable clothing to constitute the offence, and leave it to a judge to determine in each case.
United States[edit]
A variety of different offenses, such as "indecent exposure", "public lewdness", "public indecency", "disorderly conduct" and so on, may involve exposure of a specific body part (genitals, buttocks, anus, nipples on women), a specific intention or effect (being sexually suggestive, offending or annoying observers). In some cases, a member of the opposite sex must be present. In Florida, designated nudity areas are given an explicit exception.
There are also some specific prohibitions against sexual acts, such as having sexual intercourse in public, or publicly caressing someone in a sexual way. In Indiana and Tennessee, there are specific prohibitions against showing a noticeably erect penis through clothing, or other sensitive areas through semi-transparent clothing.
In some states, indecent conduct can also occur on private property, depending on the intent or effect of the act. In some cases there are exceptions for spouses, breastfeeding, and in New York, theatre performances.
In most states, there is a governing state statute which defines the offense; in Maryland and Massachusetts, indecency is defined by case law.[20] Some local (county and municipal) governments also regulate personal exposure, as well as commercial activities such as strip clubs.
Case law in general governs the interpretation of the statutory definition, and in some cases allows for additional exceptions.[21][22]
In general, exposure of the head, upper chest, and limbs is legal, and considered socially acceptable except among certain religious communities.
Federal, state, and local regulations for certain occupations require various pieces of protective clothing for the safety of the wearer. Such items include hard hats, safety vests, life jackets, aprons, hairnets, and steel-toe boots.
In the first decade of the twenty-first century there was some controversy in some southern U.S. states over the wearing of trousers so low as to expose the underwear (sagging). The practice was banned in some places.
Some states and towns have loose, or no, regulations for requiring clothing. The city of San Francisco has a history of public nudity, including at public events such as Bay to Breakers. The town of Brattleboro, VT experienced a brief period during which there was public nudity, until a law was passed banning it.[23]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clothing_laws_by_country
It's always good to get the legal information first before having a silly opinion
This business of letting messed up growm men in the little girls bathroom is sick as it gets,
and is designed to be just that - to keep people from focusing on the ongoing COMMUNIST revolution paid for by George Soros and his ILLk.
Last edited:
Wow - so much desertion! Guess one can't comment on anything without others denigrating their thoughts and/or feelings.
The comment was that his daughter was concerned about the LGBT community taking the rainbow as their symbol. I would have thought that the comments would be something in the order of "you need to explain to your daughter that she has nothing to fear and that she needs to stand up to what others think of her" or some such. Instead, we get nothing but insults, innuendo and mean-spiritedness.
Guess the world is going to hell in a hand basket!! We can't even be civil anymore. That is truly unfortunate.
JMHO
The comment was that his daughter was concerned about the LGBT community taking the rainbow as their symbol. I would have thought that the comments would be something in the order of "you need to explain to your daughter that she has nothing to fear and that she needs to stand up to what others think of her" or some such. Instead, we get nothing but insults, innuendo and mean-spiritedness.
Guess the world is going to hell in a hand basket!! We can't even be civil anymore. That is truly unfortunate.
JMHO
Not if you listen to C.B.C. radio 7 days a week!
Why would anyone do that to themselves? You are not that far out in the bush.
Wouldn't want to see that either.
Seems to be some resistance from bureaucrats to downsize themselves. Apparently putting the taxpayer first isn't in their union agreement.
Like one of those little coin grabbing gag bank machines with the little green hand...
The money goes in but it doesn't come out
Vintage Bandit Box Coin Bank Shakes and Spooky Hand Grabs Coin
Ah "bandit box" ...what do you know?
banditry is a business model
The money goes in but it doesn't come out
Vintage Bandit Box Coin Bank Shakes and Spooky Hand Grabs Coin
Ah "bandit box" ...what do you know?
banditry is a business model
Last edited:
"Bullshit" is a synonym for defence lawyer.
Good thing I'm not a defense lawyer, then.
You really gotta get over this retarded notion that you have the faintest idea what a lawyer, or even a criminal defense lawyer, does.
I'm sure you watched a bunch of TV shows, but I got bad news for you.
Pride parade lost its meaning and has become a Corporate advertising opportunity and no, there are not 300lbers flailing their wangs.
It's a family thing these days.
It's a family thing these days.
But we won't let that stop us from hating gays and making up reasons to justify it.
Hafta take your word for it n' think it's a move in the right direction to tone down the skinfest but I'm wondering why homosexual TO cops had to travel to nyc to march in a homosexual parade. For a organization that preaches diversity they clearly miss the boat on leading by example, banning their own that wear serve and protect uniforms serving the public the queer lobby strives to reach appears counter productive. Practice what you preach can be challenging n' in this scenario the lobby scores a big fat zero, 'any hint of law enforcement in our parade is not welcome.' History tells of other groups disdain for the peoples guardians being present during their activites...pride all inclusive eh!