Thank a Vet?
- Thread starter JBeee
- Start date
The reason I asked is listed below. So take that of course and shove it and pray we never meet.
Best check your history Motxer Fuker - as to Cavalry charges during WW2. You again demonstrate that a big dog is your intellectual superior.
I along with others am sick to death of your miserable uttering, mostly uninformed but that is part of the hateful life you lead now isn't it. Misery and ignorance follows you and you leave that trail, an odorous one even after you have left the room.
The Most Famous Cavalry Charge of WWII: Last Hurrah of the Savoia Cavalry Regiment in 1942
The Last Cavalry Charges: Mounted on Horses they Rode into Battle in WWII
The Polish WWII Cavalry in 1939: Fought Successful Horse mounted battles
You prove over and over again how much of a moron you are and how little you pay attention.
Not one Canadian mounted cavalry mentioned. Considering I have made it clear what my age was, naturally my Grandfather would be in WWI. Idiot.
and I would "pray that we never meet" because..............
are you threatening me goober? LOL What a f*ckin moron.
TSA agents are protecting the USA - so why do the right wingers complain about their good work and fail to give them the praise that is due to them?
There not protecting anyone but the leftist needbies who like the flock principle, but want it paid for by others. You never understood the majority of travelers would like things to go back to what it was, of course using updated scanning techniques.
(flock principle - birds in flight, schooling sardines etc.)
new word - needbies
(flock principle - birds in flight, schooling sardines etc.)
new word - needbies
In Calgary, anyone can start a charter school. There's a charter school for First Nation, as well as various schools with an educational focus, like the Science School, so a Punjabi school would be an option - but they gotta do it themselves, just like everyone else. There is one quadrant of Calgary that is predominantly East Indian ... going there is like traveling in a foreign country. I was lost in the area one day and went into a convenience store to ask directions. I thought the guy behind the counter would sell me a map at worst. Instead, he told me to phone city transit and ask them for directions. I was a bit dumbfounded, explaining that I had a car, not a cell phone. Everyone I saw in that part of the city was wearing traditional clothing from another country. Strange as it may sound, I simply headed north, thinking I would rather be in Red Deer ... but, alas, eventually I found a road that I recognized and was able to navigate my way back to something that looked like Canada.
I'm sure there are a lot of reasons why we, in retrospect, think war happened. My father, even living in Canada, was afraid of the Russians. He wasn't afraid of them, per say, but he was afraid of the quality of life that would be imposed on Canadians if the Russians were in charge. I think he based his opinion on the quality of life that the Germans imposed on the Dutch during WW2. Although greedy, rich, corporate needs may be the reason why some people orchestrate war, I think the little guy is actually going to war to ensure that the quality of life he enjoyed prior to war can be regained and preserved.
Maybe it depends on whether one is the German that wants a pure race, or someone who doesn't care about pure race but wants to have the right to play tennis at the club on Sunday afternoon.
Ask her if she's Lady Godiva ... obviously.
''There not protecting anyone but the leftist needbies who like the flock principle, but want it paid for by others.''
Wrong again. The TSA purchased this equipment they are using today under the right wing Bush regime.
Wrong again. The TSA purchased this equipment they are using today under the right wing Bush regime.
Look in the mirror if you want to point blame for the decay of social freedom of movement. You did it. Not some poltician or Ahab the Arab. YOU! Both sides of YOU. Your left and right brain made this all happen.
You missed my point, I don't care who purchased it (Bush, Lincoln or Obama), I just meant say those who are wasting our money now keeping a program that has out lived its usefulness. The TSA should have its personal reduced, with the equipment they have today we do not need all the feeling up the perverts seem to enjoy. (they are the ones who keep coming up with new ways to violate someone's privacy, and the needbies just keep rubber stamping what they do.)
''YOU! Both sides of YOU''
I thought it was BLAME OBAMA!!
'' a program that has out lived its usefulness''
Dunno about you but it seems to be working OK to me.
I thought it was BLAME OBAMA!!
'' a program that has out lived its usefulness''
Dunno about you but it seems to be working OK to me.
I personally was against the formation of 'Homeland Security", just another right we handed over to the goverment. Let the goverment prevent terrorist from getting into the country, the citizens can handle the rest, at a much cheaper rate.
Quote: Originally Posted by gopher
''YOU! Both sides of YOU''
I thought it was BLAME OBAMA!!
'' a program that has out lived its usefulness''
Dunno about you but it seems to be working OK to me.
It has turned into a bloated Bureaucracy - Do some checking on it.
Blame Obama is a bureaucracy? I thought it was just a bunch of right wingnuts that worked for free.
''YOU! Both sides of YOU''
I thought it was BLAME OBAMA!!
'' a program that has out lived its usefulness''
Dunno about you but it seems to be working OK to me.
It has turned into a bloated Bureaucracy - Do some checking on it.
Blame Obama is a bureaucracy? I thought it was just a bunch of right wingnuts that worked for free.
''I personally was against the formation of 'Homeland Security", just another right we handed over to the goverment''
You and everybody else had 7 years under Bush to put a stop but all of you were silent until now when a Democrat entered the White House.
You and everybody else had 7 years under Bush to put a stop but all of you were silent until now when a Democrat entered the White House.
This concept has never changed. The greatest homeland security challenges facing America are the preservation of our national sovereignty and historic constitutional rights in the face of terrorist enemies and corporate globalism masquerading as free trade. The best defense against terrorist attacks on our homeland is a combination of full enforcement of our existing immigration laws, improved intelligence gathering ability within strict constitutional limits, and increased homeland security forces to guard key infrastructure.
The best defense against loss of American sovereignty to global trade fanaticism is through educating the American public and elected officials on the true cost to the American middle class of allowing continued waves of low-income immigrants and below-cost products to flood our markets while simultaneously allowing American jobs to be outsourced to foreign nations, and through education efforts unmasking the on-going scheme to merge the United States into a North American Union. Patting down passengers at the airports is only hurting the airline industry, it is so important to have that physical contact, private security firms could do it better and cheaper. Under Bush there was opposition to Homeland Security as it was given to us. It was just supposed to be a stop-gap measure to appease the public who wanted us to do something fast, well we did it fast and now it has become another untouchable governmental department. Now is the time to refine it before something else happens. It can be made much less intrusive and much better detecting what ever they want to find.
''Under Bush there was opposition to Homeland Security as it was given to us.''
Sure there was - from people like me. Because of that we were immediately branded as communist, jihadist sympathizer, and anti-semite for doing so. Meanwhile, the right wing applauded everything done by Bush. Under Obama, nothing has changed. Somehow, the right wingers now feel that these actions are intrusive and illegal even though they had 7 years under Bush to do the same but they chose to stay silent.
Sure there was - from people like me. Because of that we were immediately branded as communist, jihadist sympathizer, and anti-semite for doing so. Meanwhile, the right wing applauded everything done by Bush. Under Obama, nothing has changed. Somehow, the right wingers now feel that these actions are intrusive and illegal even though they had 7 years under Bush to do the same but they chose to stay silent.