Full credit for gutting the Military goes to Chretien & Martin. They just outdid Trudeau.
Yeah, but he put the idea in their heads. :smile:
Full credit for gutting the Military goes to Chretien & Martin. They just outdid Trudeau.
Mismanagement of the economy along with the outright theft by all powerful Politicians and Religious leaders. Check to see how many companies are run/owned by the Revolutionary Guards is one place for Jbeee to look. .That is not the US, those are UN sanctions nice try though. How is US foreign policy and American's indifference affecting the average Iranian?
Right, so we should view him favourably because he made the same mistake a lot of other people did? That makes perfect sense.Yea, you bring up the fact he ran up a deficit without mentioning that the same trend was seen in many of the western countries at the time, including the u.s.a...
Right, so we should view him favourably because he made the same mistake a lot of other people did? That makes perfect sense.
Yes I do remember Clark wanted to raise gas taxes 18 cents - Trudeau stated no more than 16 cents during his campaign. Then the following year it was raised again.No but you should understand the political culture of the time and not view his actions in a vacuum. Their was no appetite for balanced budgets at the time. I distinctly remember Clark trying to get the deficit under control and getting turfed out of office. Blame Trudeau all you want but deficit financing is what the Canadian people wanted.
Yeah, I get that, I was a young man at the time and very much engaged in the political culture, but that doesn't mean he was right, and that's the point. CUBert's claiming without offering any evidence that he was the greatest, I think he did too many things wrong--see Colpy's short list above, for instance--to wear that mantle.No but you should understand the political culture of the time and not view his actions in a vacuum.
Laurier does often come to mind as well.Yeah, I get that, I was a young man at the time and very much engaged in the political culture, but that doesn't mean he was right, and that's the point. CUBert's claiming without offering any evidence that he was the greatest, I think he did too many things wrong--see Colpy's short list above, for instance--to wear that mantle.
Colpy's list was hardly convincing, how are bilingualism and multiculturalism negatives?
Needless expense mostly. Out west, we would be better off having government services in English/Chinese rather than English/French. As for multiculturalism, I really don't care if people wish to retain their cultures. The English, French, Irish, Ukrainians and Dutch Canadians all did it without government money.
It would be nice if you actually learned from history, instead of simply regurgitating the inane pap that you so strongly believe in.
I hate to tell you, but war has totally, and completely, settled more issues than any other thing in history (I am including the diseases that often accompany wars, especially those in the past).
What was settled then was if you destroy a countries ability to improve their economy by placing everything they own literally as War Reparations as was done after WW1, you set the seeds for another War.Maybe you should follow your own advice. Following on that thought, tell me what was settled with WW1.
What was settled then was if you destroy a countries ability to improve their economy by placing everything they own literally as War Reparations as was done after WW1, you set the seeds for another War.
Then we also had the Marshall Plan - As much to stop a repeat of the ealier mistakes and as a bastion against communism - but it also put Western Europe back towards a stable economy.
ROFLMAO....so...WWI, the "war to end all wars" was just a setup for another war. I wonder, could that be said about all wars?
I brought forward some points to your question - laugh or criticize - Or perhaps rebut - We are all well aware of the name and familiar with that refrain of the War to end all Wars.ROFLMAO....so...WWI, the "war to end all wars" was just a setup for another war. I wonder, could that be said about all wars?
Not all, but WW-I definatly was concluded after WW-II.
All he said was he was concluded after WW2Of course, so, I guess my Grandfathers feelings that his brothers life was wasted and his time dodging bullets in the cavalry was a waste, are wrong, since WWII made everything A-OK in the world.:roll:
All he said was he was concluded after WW2
As o Cavalry i take it that you are referring to WW1?