So you still take "climate scientists" seriously?
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
Someone needs to school you
Silly question... None have proven any form of accuracy (unless you count inaccurate as a form)
Don't care about them
Carla
Yes, all of them
Yes
About 912
Done that too
East Anglia, the UN and IPCC
I see a rye and water in my immediate future, I even developed a model to determine the probability of said prediction.
... Success... 100% success and complete consensus from the international scientific community
Cheers bud..
I see a cider and bbq in mine.
I see a rye and water in my immediate future, I even developed a model to determine the probability of said prediction.
... Success... 100% success and complete consensus from the international scientific community
Cheers bud..
We went for dinner last night and capped off with a double of Oban for dessert.
I don't know a d@mn thing about science and couldn't begin to have a half way intelligent discussion on the subject so that's why I generally stay away from it. However, I found a recent tv show about South Dakota on local PBS to be quite interesting: it reported findings of alligator fossils and swamps in prehistoric excavations there. This is proof that climate change can happen. The question is, when will the next one take place.
I leave that question up to the experts.
I leave that question up to the experts.
Climate has definitely changed. My home province of SK was once at the base of a tropical sea. Certainly if one steps outside in January once can easily see that the climate has changed since a) they are not swimming and b) its not quite tropical.
Also the assorted ice ages, etc. are also indications that the climate is far from constant.
this isn't even a political thing anymore (although usually the sides were already made-up) but one of defiance. the way the media, mental masturbators and money interests have simply fooled a lot of seemingly intelligent people into thinking that suddenly, just recently, the world has gone to hell and it is because of the 'right', or 'oil' or ignorant nasty moderators is stunning. the gullibility is sad. these people used to be free thinkers, the wonderers. now they become numbed.
...now they have become drones for the cause, regardless of the embarrassment they are feeling. they will never submit or relent because to do so would mean losing face, not the debate, because there is no goddamn debate and they know it. they will go down with their ship. it's sad to watch. it's like benny hinn and jim jones grabbed their hands and have led them along.it's a cult man.
...now they have become drones for the cause, regardless of the embarrassment they are feeling. they will never submit or relent because to do so would mean losing face, not the debate, because there is no goddamn debate and they know it. they will go down with their ship. it's sad to watch. it's like benny hinn and jim jones grabbed their hands and have led them along.it's a cult man.
What question? We are already well into the LIA. That's why they keep lying to us with this bogus warming crap.
I liked The Cult. Very tight band I thought, lot's of haunting tunes.
Good on ya bud.. The BBQ description has made me jealous, only to be amplified by the Oban (one of my favorites)
Well put gopher, particularly in terms of the general observations.
In my neck of the woods (AB, Canada) they have found bits and pieces of fossilized ferns (ie tropical growth) in Northern AB drill sites in drill cuttings taken from depths of <1,500 m... Obviously, we are talking about geologic time frames here, but that considered, the climate was clearly much different from what contemporary history has shown.
The underlying message is that there is far more that we don't know as opposed to the tiny amount that we do know
Had a chance to meet that band 10 years ago.. A colleague's niece was married to a member... Cool dudes
It's not there anymore. What is his evidentiary basis for believing it. He thinks sceintists are full of crap, so just wondering who told him the place used to be a tropical sea. God?
This makes me think of my work and meeting certain individuals that seem to think they know a detail about my profession I should know (or they think I don't) but somehow in their thinking they assume they know my profession better then I do because of that.
hockey schtick @hockeyschtick1 How much of this warming is real? And how much was created back at the lab? | Herald Sun
Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian
I never said scientists are full of crap. But I don't necessarily think climate scientists are real scientists.
Plenty of evidence of an ancient sea bed. Potash for one.
How much of this warming is real? And how much was created back at the lab? | Herald Sun
Cookies must be enabled. | The Australian
Oh those pesky thermometers and scientists...if only there was a way to check the thermometer record, like say with some temperature record that doesn't fill in the temperature over my house with the temperature measured at the airport...
Oh right, there is! Check out the nearly parallel lines (equivalent trends). One from those bastards at CRU using thermometers with homogeneity adjustments, the other courtesy of that stalwart skeptic John Christy, using orbitting satellites:
The satellites don't fill in the temperature over Mississauga with the temperature measured in Oakville. They're showing the same thing though. Huh. That's called replication of results. Different systems of measurement, and different systems of analysis.
Science!
But people with stock portfolios heavily invested in oil and gas say the science is bunk, so it must be. How could billions of tone of pollutants in the atmosphere and water possibly affect the climate.Oh those pesky thermometers and scientists...if only there was a way to check the thermometer record, like say with some temperature record that doesn't fill in the temperature over my house with the temperature measured at the airport...
Oh right, there is! Check out the nearly parallel lines (equivalent trends). One from those bastards at CRU using thermometers with homogeneity adjustments, the other courtesy of that stalwart skeptic John Christy, using orbitting satellites:
The satellites don't fill in the temperature over Mississauga with the temperature measured in Oakville. They're showing the same thing though. Huh. That's called replication of results. Different systems of measurement, and different systems of analysis.
Science!
This debate will go on until the naysayers choke on their own biased opinions.
Absolutely not it's a conspiracy to get government grants and stuff for free tired of those Einstein types milkin all of us for free money with their lies.lol
For the math crowd. I heard just the other day that the 'clock' was going to have to be 'changed' as the rotation of the earth was slowing due to interaction with the moon. My question is how often does that happen and would that rate be different or the same if the expanding earth made the circumference 6' larger every year. With no subduction, how many years at the same spin rate would it be before a second would have to be added would be about ???years