Sciense is a religion by itself.
- Thread starter socratus
- Start date
I hear you Bill, we got sh*t in school for misspelling more difficult words than that.-
Yes, he did say that alright, according to the sources I can find quickly, or more correctly he wrote it, in a personal letter to a philosopher named Eric Gutkind, but Einstein did not mean by "religion" what most people use the word to mean. He was completely irreligious in any conventional sense and was always quite plain about that, though various religiously inclined people keep trying to claim him as one of their own because of remarks like that and his famous "God does not play dice..." criticism of quantum theory. In its proper context, he uses religion in that quote to mean the sense of awe and wonder he experienced in contemplating, and trying to figure out, the nature of the cosmos. It had no theological content for him, it's just a metaphorical shortcut. A lot of scientists use such metaphors in their popular works--Stephen Hawking and Paul Davies come immediately to mind--and I really wish they wouldn't, because those words have widely accepted meanings in common usage that are not what the scientists mean. It confuses people like Socratus.
Knowledge.
What on earth do you mean by a "market's talk?" The phrase means nothing to me, but the burden of that remark more generally, that we can't talk about ideas of any sort without bringing in physical laws and formulae, strikes me as false.
This isn't school. Cut the guy some slack, he's already confused enough.I hear you Bill, we got sh*t in school for misspelling more difficult words than that.-
The Universe ( as a whole) is a Double World: next to Matter World
( a few % of whole mass of Universe) exist Vacuum World
( with more than 90% of whole mass of Universe).
Question:
How can the more than 90% of Vacuum Mass in the Universe
(dark mass, dark energy, quantum virtual particles, particles of ideal gas)
create a few % of Matter Mass, which give possibility to many scientists
and philosophers to say that God doesn’t exist ?
==.
( a few % of whole mass of Universe) exist Vacuum World
( with more than 90% of whole mass of Universe).
Question:
How can the more than 90% of Vacuum Mass in the Universe
(dark mass, dark energy, quantum virtual particles, particles of ideal gas)
create a few % of Matter Mass, which give possibility to many scientists
and philosophers to say that God doesn’t exist ?
==.
Sinse were all gettin picky; that would be "have" there been...............it's a scientafifficly proved facte.
Nothing exists outside the universe, separate from it. Therefore, if god exists it is the universe. All things are interconnected. As above, so below. We are made of the same stuff as the universe and (if it exists) god. The universe would be the body of god. There is no separation. We would then be a microcosm of the universe/god.
nature
Most scientist are people, people are subject to error, science is a grand tool. Scientists can easily become religious when they are confined within the ruling conventions. If you don't believe that then cast your gaze upon the giant Cern Cathedral which to date has discovered nada zip squat scratches on film how to get more funding
The Seven Hermetic Principles
The Seven Hermetic Principles (For Manifesting) - Hermes Trismegistus - YouTube
=.
Can these Seven Hermetic Principles be explained
by physical laws and formulas ?
=.
About that philosophy of science we are talking
if we don't know : what the vacuum is,
what the quantum particle is ( they say it is math point),
what an electron is (electron has six formulas and many theories)
what is the reason of 'dualism of particle' ? . . . . etc
=.
if we don't know : what the vacuum is,
what the quantum particle is ( they say it is math point),
what an electron is (electron has six formulas and many theories)
what is the reason of 'dualism of particle' ? . . . . etc
=.
The Seven Hermetic Principles
=.
1. The Universe is something Intellectual.
2. As above, so below.
3. From potential to active existence.
4. Everything in the Universe can vibrate.
5. Everything in the Universe has its cause.
6. Everything in the Universe has its opposite.
7. The Universe has its own rhythm.
/ Hermes Trismegistus /
=.
Plato – world of ideas.
Leibniz - monadas.
Kant - thing-in-itself
=.
Is it possible to explain the 'philosophy of idealism '
using physical laws and formulas ?
===…
=.
1. The Universe is something Intellectual.
2. As above, so below.
3. From potential to active existence.
4. Everything in the Universe can vibrate.
5. Everything in the Universe has its cause.
6. Everything in the Universe has its opposite.
7. The Universe has its own rhythm.
/ Hermes Trismegistus /
=.
Plato – world of ideas.
Leibniz - monadas.
Kant - thing-in-itself
=.
Is it possible to explain the 'philosophy of idealism '
using physical laws and formulas ?
===…
I don't think so, love hasn't been explained with physical laws and formulas yet even after all these eons. Of course I'm just guessing . What does blackhole Hawkings say?
Last edited: