Hmmm, rights v. the public interest.
Interesting conundrum.
Skook, what's your full take on this?
Seems there are always some who like to push the limits. I believe it is a logical push back against the continuous attack on firearms ownership and citizens rights. Yes is was a young law student, but do we not give young political science and arts students even more rope than that?
There are a few overly officious police (and other officials) everywhere, part of the human condition and if not resisted by law the situation will become violent eventually. The "public interest" has IMO, been used conveniently by those who claim to speak for the public but with their own more narrow agenda.
A classic example is an article i posted the other day.....
http://forums.canadiancontent.net/news/107517-federal-ndp-critics-say-harper.html
How anyone can equate the end of the LONG GUN registry to criminal gang shootings is beyond me, but that would appear to the casual reader to be the implication as it includes the words "gun control", the two are not even remotely related but the effect of such disingenuous crap is well known and accepted among political weasels.
As the population grows there are way more Ox's to be gored, both real and imagined.