darkbeaver; said:Perkins must suffer because he's stupid.
As I think about it, isn't it strange that the Tea Baggers aren't out there protesting against FEMA camps or other forms of relief for all those people there?
darkbeaver; said:Perkins must suffer because he's stupid.
FOX “Family Values” News Correspondent Arrested For Rape, Sodomy
A Fox News alumnus has been arrested and charged with rape. Orlando Salinas, 57, was arrested July 28 on two felony charges of rape and sodomy. The arrest of Salinas comes after a grand jury was convened in relation to an incident which is alleged to have transpired January 11, 2016. Due to the nature of the charge, the victim’s identity is not being revealed. However court documents do stipulate that the individual Salinas is accused of raping is not his wife.
The fall from public life for Salinas came in April 2015 when he was fired from local Virginia television station WDBJ7 after three years of employment for insubordination. Before working at WDBJ7 Salinas was Fox News correspondent for twelve years from 2000 – 2012 who was known for his combative interview style.
From Fox hosts Bill O’Reilly settling a sexual harrassment lawsuit, to Brian Kilmead joking that a woman who was beaten on an elevator “should have taken the stairs” and now with the recent departure of Fox CEO Roger Ailes over sexual harassment allegations over 25 women have come forward with awful decade’s long tales of mistreatment, it is clear Fox has long cultivated a culture of misogyny and male entitlement.
After Salinas left the news business he began a new career as a Remax real estate agent. In an Dec. 2015 “Whatever happened to?” interview, Salinas’ boss Amy Hudson said, “He’s a wonderful people person. People who know who he is really trust him.”
The judge who set Salinas’ bond did not agree with Hudson’s assessment of Salinas’ trustworthy nature, as he is being held at Montgomery County Jail without bond. Each charge levied against Salinas carries a minimum of five years and a maximum of life in prison. His next scheduled court date is Oct. 29.
Yet another in a long line of self righteous moral perverts from the GOP caught red handed.
FOX "Family Values" News Correspondent Arrested For Rape, Sodomy
It's quite a stretch to suggest that no Democrat ever did anything immoral or got caught red handed doing it. Of course the Democrats are better at covering up their scandals. One lies and the rest of them swear to it.
They are also very good at placing the blame for their questionable behaviors on other sources.
It's quite a stretch to suggest that no Democrat ever did anything immoral or got caught red handed doing it. Of course the Democrats are better at covering up their scandals. One lies and the rest of them swear to it.
They are also very good at placing the blame for their questionable behaviors on other sources.
Yep, it's why I'm pretty skeptical about these 10 women who have come forth with accusations against Trump. The first one MIGHT be credible, I would suggest the rest finally got "brave". I wouldn't be surprised if there's people (Democrats) putting them up to this sh*t. Of course no one but the perpetrators knows for sure what is going on.
"F**k it, I'm out": Josh Barro quits GOP, joins Democrats
"F**k it, I'm out": Josh Barro quits GOP, joins Democrats
Those women are as phony as a three dollar bill. The first one too. Some of them at least had the sense to try to cry a little (better actresses?). But 'ol' Jessie, she was all smiles, enjoying her few minutes of fame to the fullest!
What's really disgusting about women who make up these allegations is that they make it hard for real victims to get justice.
davesmom; said:It's quite a stretch to suggest that no Democrat ever did anything immoral or got caught red handed doing it. Of course the Democrats are better at covering up their scandals. One lies and the rest of them swear to it.
They are also very good at placing the blame for their questionable behaviors on other sources.
I'm beginning to wonder if Old Trump isn't getting a little soft in the head. Elections (U.S. and Canada) are run by very strict rules with scrutineers from the general population. Be kind of nice when this charade is over. Two years is about 23 months too long and probably $23 billion too much. Hopefully after this maybe the procedure will change. Anyway I won't be in any suspense!![]()
Clearly.I'm not very knowledgable about the American representation
I'm beginning to wonder if Old Trump isn't getting a little soft in the head. Elections (U.S. and Canada) are run by very strict rules with scrutineers from the general population. Be kind of nice when this charade is over. Two years is about 23 months too long and probably $23 billion too much. Hopefully after this maybe the procedure will change. Anyway I won't be in any suspense!![]()
Why is that a problem? It's in our Constitution. The people don't elect the President, the state legislatures do.The problem with the US is that the 'strict rules' for the elections vary from state to state, and seem to be pretty vague at times. In Canada, we have Elections Canada that runs the elections according to very strict rules. In the US, every State does their own thing.
Who really knows the truth of it? I can't imagine that anyone connected to the election process in any way is going to agree/admit it if there is election fraud.
There are many ways that the voting can be unfair that may not be defined as 'fraud' but are not honest either; people registered to vote in multiple States, people who are deceased, people who are not require to show sufficient identification. And what guarantee is there that the watchdogs/scrutineers are honest?
The biggest problem I see with the American system is unequal representation. We have the same problem in Canada. Ontario and Quebec, being the most populous get to run the country.
I'm not very knowledgable about the American representation but I am of the understanding that with some States having a larger number of Delegates, it takes away from the voter's choice in other States.
Then there are the Delegates who refuse to vote with the will of the people, which I don't think is right. If a Delegate is not bound to represent the voters' choice, what's the point in having a general election?
Why is that a problem? It's in our Constitution. The people don't elect the President, the state legislatures do.
Well, feel free to switch over to the hockey game.It's not really a problem, it just makes for messy confusing elections.