And I already explained to you why a Republican would have been crucified. When somebody makes a statement like that, people, particularly blacks look at the totality of his life. What has he done to help blacks in the past? If he has done plenty in the past, then his statement forms only a small part of the narrative. Provided he apologizes, he is forgiven.
The problem is, when a Republican makes such a statement, there is usually nothing in his background to show that he has done anything to help blacks. He may even have supported legislation which may have harmed blacks. In that case, the stupid, racist statement is not part of the narrative, it is the whole narrative. That is why a Republican does not have a cover when he makes a similar statement.
Thus when Senator Lott made a similar statement, that summarized his attitudes towards blacks, since he had done precious little in his life to help blacks, to try to better their lot. However, when Reid made such a statement he could point to a series of accomplishments in the past, where he has done plenty to help blacks.
That is why Lott was crucified, while Reid will survive.