Did you read the article?
I didn't.
No I didn’t. But my comment was not about the article, my comment was about Walter’s comment ‘you lie’. My point was that it was too tame compared to what many right wingnuts have called Obama.
Did you read the article?
I didn't.
Yup, as soon as your unemployment insurance runs out, you are dropped from rolls as seeking employment because you are still unemployed. (6 months, one year and your nobody). Do not count anymore, nothing, nada.
So what is your point ironsides? Do you want to change the way you people calculate unemployment now, to show a huge, sudden jump in unemployment numbers?
Now we really have to wait for the unemployment to come down. Most economists think that it will indeed come down, the question is when and how much.
Yes, show actual unemployment, not some number that they fudge. For this though, we have to go back to Johnson/Nixon era when they changed it top what they show now. They were closer to the truth then. (more realistic)
"7.5 Million Americans out of work... half of them lost their job since Obama took office."
Does not matter. It is Bush's fault! ALWAYS!
"7.5 Million Americans out of work... half of them lost their job since Obama took office."
Does not matter. It is Bush's fault! ALWAYS!
Tell that to sjp according to his philosopy everything is the fault of those dirty old white republicans.So what's your point? I don't believe Ogama is in the job creation or confiscation business. People can not create jobs, unless there is a demand somewhere. It ain't rocket science Y.J. AND IT DEFINITELY aint' got nuthin' to do with being Republican or Democrat.
Tell that to sjp according to his philosopy everything is the fault of those dirty old white republicans.
Excuse me dirty old white male republicans.