Palin Challenges Obama to Debate

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
67



Anybody beats Barry in a debate without his teleprompter.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
Oh come on BOOMer ........most young men have better taste than that.;-)

(or do they??):p




Anybody beats Barry in a debate without his teleprompter.

In above, poor Obama looks like he is battling a hemorrhoid attack (and can't sit still);-) Just sayin'
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
There's no downside for Palin; everyone thinks she's an idiot already, there's nothing for her to lose, she's not even a candidate.

There's no upside for Obama.

If I was Obama, I would reply that if she wins the nomination, I'd gladly debate her on live tv.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
What's next? Will Ann Coulter and other right wing pseudo-intellectuals be lining up the challenge Obama? Quite frankly I suspect that the President of the United States has better things to do than engage in debates with people that are not remotely close to his intellectual equal.
 

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,399
95
48
What's next? Will Ann Coulter and other right wing pseudo-intellectuals be lining up the challenge Obama? Quite frankly I suspect that the President of the United States has better things to do than engage in debates with people that are not remotely close to his intellectual equal.

Indeed. THat is why the challenge itself is such a joke.

Face it........Looks can get you only so far.

Suspect she might be missing the media attention........and she sure do love that camera.

What's next , You ask: Rumor has it that Barbie wants to debate Ken.....
 
Last edited:

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
And why would Obama accept? Is she running?
Oh yes, must keep herself relevant. Must stay in the spotlight, the ability to charge those big fees for when she attempts to appear that she has independent critical thought.

Probably why Newt Gingrich is still campaigning. He's unlikely to win, but he has some time to build a brand...of crazy. People pay good money for crazy these days.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
Indeed. THat is why the challenge itself is such a joke.

Face it........Looks can get you only so far.

Suspect she might be missing the media attention........and she sure do love that camera.

What's next , You ask: Rumor has it that Barbie wants to debate Ken.....

Nancy Pelosi......Much better looking and smarter..Oui?

Pelosi: we have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out what is in it - YouTube

Or.....;-)
Pelosi gets Owned - what we all would like to do!!! - YouTube
 

wulfie68

Council Member
Mar 29, 2009
2,014
24
38
Calgary, AB
Oh come on BOOMer ........most young men have better taste than that.;-)

(or do they??):p

Don't be catty, Breezy: we can admit Palin is an attractive woman and still not find in merit in her politics (such as they are). When I was single, I would have slept with her, had the chance been there. I wouldn't have been interested in hearing most of what she had to say, but I would have slept with her.

As for the rest, I'm with those who stated there is nothing for Obama to gain by debating her: with her grasp of politics, it would be equivalent to her bringing a nerf bat to a gun fight... and those who support her wouldn't admit the defeat when it stared them in the face (her male supporters would probably be staring at her cleavage :p ).
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
What's next? Will Ann Coulter and other right wing pseudo-intellectuals be lining up the challenge Obama? Quite frankly I suspect that the President of the United States has better things to do than engage in debates with people that are not remotely close to his intellectual equal.

You are absolutely correct, of course.....he is under no obligation to debate anyone other than the candidate....and not even him, if he so chooses.

I would love to see him debate Coulter, Steyn, Gingrich.......and a number of other people that are not remotely his intellectual equal. :p

You obviously haven't figured out yet that Barak is an empty suit.......
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
You are absolutely correct, of course.....he is under no obligation to debate anyone other than the candidate....and not even him, if he so chooses.

I would love to see him debate Coulter, Steyn, Gingrich.......and a number of other people that are not remotely his intellectual equal. :p

You obviously haven't figured out yet that Barak is an empty suit.......

And Coulter and the Newt are what???????????
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
And Coulter and the Newt are what???????????

Both brilliant.

One is a showman, the other corrupt and crazy, but their intelligence is not in doubt, nor is their ability to "think outside the box".

I don't think Obama ever had an original thought in his life.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Both brilliant.

One is a showman, the other corrupt and crazy, but their intelligence is not in doubt, nor is their ability to "think outside the box".

I don't think Obama ever had an original thought in his life.

Nor is their ability to rabble rouse, attack minorities, nor is their ability in doubt that they have made a fortune of this type of divisive behavior.
 

gore0bsessed

Time Out
Oct 23, 2011
2,414
0
36
Both brilliant.

One is a showman, the other corrupt and crazy, but their intelligence is not in doubt, nor is their ability to "think outside the box".

I don't think Obama ever had an original thought in his life.

Their intelligence is very much in doubt.
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
This is the problem with some of the leadership of the Republican Party they feel they have
some superior intellect they would like to display on national television even though they are
on the fringe of the party. Palin did herself in when she saddled up to ride with the Tea Party.
As for the enlightened ones who have put ideas forward that are candidates that is something
else again.
1 get rid of the department of education
2 rid themselves of the treasury
3 prepare to attack Iran another war they can't afford
4 being critical of one candidate because he could speak Mandarin
5 call Obama an elitist because he wanted to see all Americans with a post secondary education.

These are just a few examples of superior intellect during the campaign. These are supposed to
be the smart ones. Oh I forgot Palin knows about world affairs she could see Russia out here front
window pardon me. Seriously why would he entertain the idea of debating an air head.