Ontario and, Quebec Play key Role in Oil Collapse

Sons of Liberty

Walks on Water
Aug 24, 2010
1,284
0
36
Evil Empire
Your protectionist policies are simply appalling, you're your own worst enemy. It's as if you aren't Canadians, but rather a confederation of Provinces. Hmmm.
 

Liberalman

Senate Member
Mar 18, 2007
5,623
35
48
Toronto
It was Ontario and Quebec that supplied most of the investment cash for developement of the Alberta oil but all they got from the rednecks from the heartland of wildrose is "let the east freeze in the dark." This is why there is pushback from Ontario and Quebec for the east pipeline. Alberta can be in boom times now and all they have to do is spread the wealth.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
It was Ontario and Quebec that supplied most of the investment cash for developement of the Alberta oil but all they got from the rednecks from the heartland of wildrose is "let the east freeze in the dark." This is why there is pushback from Ontario and Quebec for the east pipeline. Alberta can be in boom times now and all they have to do is spread the wealth.


wrong

. It's as if you aren't Canadians, but rather a confederation of Provinces. Hmmm.


Canada IS a Confederation. What is your point?
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
He does have a point. Regional prejudices are playing a big part in this mess.


That is true, but to say we sound like a Confederation...... ya.....we are. It was the original idea that the Provinces would hold the majority of the power. Unfortunately, the provinces have allowed the Feds to slowly erode that power away.

When it comes to energy east. Ontario and Quebec can not prevent the pipeline from being built as that is under Federal jurisdiction. Trudeau has the power to push it through. Unfortunately, the little fu ck is doing everything he can to stack the deck against the pipelines, by keeping his mouth wrapped firmly around the dick of the environmentalists and the Montreal mayor.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,507
700
113
59
Alberta
That is true, but to say we sound like a Confederation...... ya.....we are. It was the original idea that the Provinces would hold the majority of the power. Unfortunately, the provinces have allowed the Feds to slowly erode that power away.

When it comes to energy east. Ontario and Quebec can not prevent the pipeline from being built as that is under Federal jurisdiction. Trudeau has the power to push it through. Unfortunately, the little fu ck is doing everything he can to stack the deck against the pipelines, by keeping his mouth wrapped firmly around the dick of the environmentalists and the Montreal mayor.

You know what I like about you Gerryh. Your uncompromising honesty. You tell it like it is.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
You know what I like about you Gerryh. Your uncompromising honesty. You tell it like it is.
That also means Harper had the same authority, it is now quite likely Harpster was spending money helping delay the line even going south. (and certainly not to the east) Buying from Saudi is helping the US pay it's debt for their co-operation, it has nothing to do with keeping Canadian feet warm.
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
Wow, you believe that two so-so Provinces wield that sort of global power? News flash: they don't and if we did the international oil companies would be owned by us.
I think this is an April Fools post and well done by Retired Canadian.....
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
Conspiracy theories. Oh joy.

So, who decides these things, then? It's not a conspiracy. We are a piddly little player and others who are not make the decisions, carry the financial risks. He who pays the piper gets to call the tune. That's not a conspiracy (unless you are some manner of kook). That is business.

It was Ontario and Quebec that supplied most of the investment cash for developement of the Alberta oil but all they got from the rednecks from the heartland of wildrose is "let the east freeze in the dark." This is why there is pushback from Ontario and Quebec for the east pipeline. Alberta can be in boom times now and all they have to do is spread the wealth.

Bullsh1t. It was Texans who put the dough down. Maybe that is the problem. The oil patch has never been fully Canadian.
 

Nick Danger

Council Member
Jul 21, 2013
1,798
461
83
Penticton, BC
Trudeau has the power to push it through. Unfortunately, the little fu ck is doing everything he can to stack the deck against the pipelines, by keeping his mouth wrapped firmly around the dick of the environmentalists and the Montreal mayor.

That's what I was talking about above. Trudeau is a politician, and the environmentalists carry a lot of political weight these days, more than enough to sway the outcome of an election if you piss them off too much. I'm sure he sees the economic benefit of Energy East (and the Trans Mountain expansion), he has said as much already, but as a politician he also sees the necessity of approaching the issue diplomatically.
 
Last edited:

Sons of Liberty

Walks on Water
Aug 24, 2010
1,284
0
36
Evil Empire
Canada IS a Confederation. What is your point?

Point being I believe that is your Achilles Heel. From the outside you appear to be an indecisive, quarrelsome country teetering on the brink of disunion. Canadian politics are filled with terms like "regional disparity", and all sorts of regional rivalries. The protectionist policies you implement doesn't enable the free flow of commerce across your Provinces, why do you think the vast majority of your exports go to the US? Because it's easier to trade south than it is with each other. Your confederation is working against you, imo.

One of the few things I have never understood in Canadian politics is this division between provinces. The have and have not's, who is giving up money to pay who and the resentment that follows with it. I attribute all this to your decentralization of your government, yes gerryh your Confederation.

Granted, I'm an outsider and maybe I'm wrong, but that's what I observed over many years.

 

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
5,791
3,638
113
Edmonton
Some might even say consorting with the enemy. As oil prices are affected and people from across Canada continue to lose their jobs, we need only to look within our own borders to see the real pigs at the trough who are contributing to lost revenues. Aside from the fact that Ontario, Quebec and some Maritime Provinces are putting the environment at risk by shipping in their oil via supertanker from Saudi Arabia, they are also taking advantage of the cheap oil deliberately being flooded on the market to cripple oil producing nations like Canada.

The result is a slow down in the economy, huge loss in tax revenues that is felt from coast to coast. While the environmental windbags in Ontario and Quebec complain about pipelines they are in fact putting our precious waterways at risk while increasing their carbon footprint.

I wonder why no one is asking our esteemed Prime Minister about this.



Actually, he "graced" our city earlier this week and was interviewed on the radio. Because I was at work, I was unable to hear the interview. I was out and about yesterday and low and behold the radio station was re-playing his interview so I heard a portion of it. I was really upset at the low-ball questions being asked (apparently by listeners who emailed/texted questions) like whether he had French or Heinz ketchup in his fridge. Are you kidding me??


He was asked about the ban on super tankers on the West Coast and he spoke about the environment and how 20,000 BC'ers rely on the waters for their living etc., etc. - a reasonable answer to be sure. I couldn't disagree with a lot of what he had to say (amazingly enough). The interviewer could have challenged him more on that answer but didn't.


When asked about the East Coast however that also had super tankers in their waters why Canada was getting oil from Venezuela as opposed to using its own oil, the bobbing and weaving was incredible. JT didn't answer the question - just the usual political rhetoric about how we need to investigate and study and blah blah blah. Was ticked me off was that the interviewer didn't challenge him for not answering the question at all.


I am soooo, soooo tired of the media not challenging our politicians - doesn't matter what stripe, but ESPECIALLY Trudeau and the Liberals it makes me so mad. I don't know about you but I want answers not rhetoric. I want to know why and how and when and where. Good grief doesn't anyone else? Even an "I don't know but I'll get back to you" would be better than the BS drivel we get on a regular basis.


When we finally have a media (The Rebel) who would challenge them, they're banned or ignored instead, likely because they don't like to be challenged. So much for free speech and open governments.


sigh....


JMHO

I think that near the bottom of this issue you will find a growing opposition to fossil fuels in general. We could argue the right and wrong of this until the cows come home but it is fact that the negative press the petro industry has taken in recent years is its toll. Informed or not, the general public is more and more taking an "oil = bad" stance and are gaining the ear of our elected officials who, unfortunately, see no difference between an informed vote and an uninformed one because at the end of the day it is votes that fuel the political engine.



And we don't have a politician in sight that has the "balls" to stand up and tell it like it is. Sad!
 

Nick Danger

Council Member
Jul 21, 2013
1,798
461
83
Penticton, BC
That is the nature of the political beast. I would go so far as to suggest that in a case such as you described above, where Prime Minister Trudeau chose to bob and weave rather than answer directly, that it wasn't because he didn't have an answer, but because he didn't think it was the right time to deliver his answer. Of course he'd like to see Energy East go through, if you objectively weigh the pros and cons the only realistic answer is yes, let's get some western oil to eastern markets. But he has to make sure the choice is framed in such a way as to create the least amount of friction among voters, and give his political opponents the least amount of retaliatory ammo. A "ballsy" move in this case would likely be the one that loses him the next election, and it's a sad fact that a politician's job is more centered around keeping his job as opposed to actually doing his job. :)
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,803
7,072
113
B.C.
Actually, he "graced" our city earlier this week and was interviewed on the radio. Because I was at work, I was unable to hear the interview. I was out and about yesterday and low and behold the radio station was re-playing his interview so I heard a portion of it. I was really upset at the low-ball questions being asked (apparently by listeners who emailed/texted questions) like whether he had French or Heinz ketchup in his fridge. Are you kidding me??


He was asked about the ban on super tankers on the West Coast and he spoke about the environment and how 20,000 BC'ers rely on the waters for their living etc., etc. - a reasonable answer to be sure. I couldn't disagree with a lot of what he had to say (amazingly enough). The interviewer could have challenged him more on that answer but didn't.


When asked about the East Coast however that also had super tankers in their waters why Canada was getting oil from Venezuela as opposed to using its own oil, the bobbing and weaving was incredible. JT didn't answer the question - just the usual political rhetoric about how we need to investigate and study and blah blah blah. Was ticked me off was that the interviewer didn't challenge him for not answering the question at all.


I am soooo, soooo tired of the media not challenging our politicians - doesn't matter what stripe, but ESPECIALLY Trudeau and the Liberals it makes me so mad. I don't know about you but I want answers not rhetoric. I want to know why and how and when and where. Good grief doesn't anyone else? Even an "I don't know but I'll get back to you" would be better than the BS drivel we get on a regular basis.


When we finally have a media (The Rebel) who would challenge them, they're banned or ignored instead, likely because they don't like to be challenged. So much for free speech and open governments.


sigh....


JMHO





And we don't have a politician in sight that has the "balls" to stand up and tell it like it is. Sad!
And that is why they are feeling the Bern and the Donald down to our south.