One of my nuttier political opinions.

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Yeah, that makes sense, but what a 'circle' of failure, buy the drugs, or booze,
drink it or however you get it into your body, turn into a frankenstein type
individual, or a robot, or whatever, wander around the street, (legally) in
some sort of stupor, sleep it off somewhere, then start all over. Don't know
how it would reduce the number of users, if it is cheaper, more will probably
buy the product, and our streets will look like a outdoor mental institution.
What a sight to behold for aliens who decide to land here, and have a good
look at 'who we are', how disgusting, and embarrassing, it is shamefull to
look at 'what we have become'.

Most hard drug addicts are business people who function quite normally, at least as normal as can be for living in an insane society like our urban funny farms. The poor drug addicts you see on the news are poor, malnourished and often suffer from mental illness. They are not your usual drug addicts.
 

Liberalman

Senate Member
Mar 18, 2007
5,623
36
48
Toronto
So basically you are saying legalize any law that the police are having trouble enforcing and put it under government control?

So then you want to get rid of driving while intoxicated laws.

Prostitution laws.

Rape laws.

So what you are really saying is living under anarchy where anything goes would be better for society as a whole. Right
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
So basically you are saying legalize any law that the police are having trouble enforcing and put it under government control?

So then you want to get rid of driving while intoxicated laws.

Prostitution laws.

Rape laws.

So what you are really saying is living under anarchy where anything goes would be better for society as a whole. Right

I'ld vote for anarchy but after reading some of the post on this forum I realized that we are too immature to handle that kind of freedom.
 

dumpthemonarchy

House Member
Jan 18, 2005
4,235
14
38
Vancouver
www.cynicsunlimited.com
Drugs like crystal meth, ecstasy, pot, cocaine etc are on the market and people do not know what is in them. People are spending a lot of money to get high and putting poisons in their bodies. We can all buy safe alcohol from, gosh, the gov't. So other drugs have to be regulated and made safe too. This is no longer radical as far as I am concerned.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Niflmir, perhaps for you it's a nutty opinion, but there is some sense in it. If illegal drugs were legalized and treated in the same sort of manner as our foods are, I bet that things would be a little better. Legalisation would sure take the wind out of the sails of people such as the Taliban and the drug sectors of organised crime.
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
I firmly believe in the legalisation of all recreational drugs. It seems to be a fairly radical stance and I am used to fighting an uphill battle.

It may be considered ironic that a person who once suffered from a drug related mental health breakdown would endorse such a view, however, I believe that families and friends are in the best position to help individuals and they can do so only when they are aware of the problem. Criminalisation only drives the problem underground where the most useful social safety net cannot reach people: users will always deny use.

The major sticking point for most people is the hard drugs. Even if one can convince people of the rationale behind legalising soft drugs, people usually are adamant in their refusal to accept the legalisation of cocaine, heroin, amphetamines and so on. The moral breakdown is inevitable and absolute, it is contended.

Of course, I point out that there is no evidence of this. But most people do not accept a burden of proof. However, I was pointed in the direction of evidence in my favor by one such individual who originally refused to accept the idea.

The largest study ever on cocaine use was conducted in the years from 1992-1994 by the World Health Organization in collaboration with the United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute. Why can you not read these particular findings which were paid for by your tax dollars when you can read other publications from the same institute? Its findings ran counter to the "proven" success of the war on drugs and so it was said by a Mr. Neil Boyer, "If WHO activities relating to drugs fail to reinforce proven drug-control approaches, funds for the relevant programs should be curtailed". So, it was buried.

The documentation was leaked and placed into the public domain. Among other places you can read it here. The picture painted in this document is one which could easily reflect the status of alcohol usage in the world.


I take cocaine use to be serious, I have seen too many good soldiers/marines go off the deep end and get themselves killed not to mention having their careers ruined for using it. It is addictive, impairs judgment and it is not a soft drug no matter what anyone says. Yes, I have been responsible for turning in anyone under my command I caught using anything stronger than marijuana (and that depending on what we were doing). It probably saved mine and others lives. There are those who endorse the use of marijuana ok maybe, now cocaine. Where does it stop.
 

Niflmir

A modern nomad
Dec 18, 2006
3,460
58
48
Leiden, the Netherlands
I take cocaine use to be serious, I have seen too many good soldiers/marines go off the deep end and get themselves killed not to mention having their careers ruined for using it. It is addictive, impairs judgment and it is not a soft drug no matter what anyone says. Yes, I have been responsible for turning in anyone under my command I caught using anything stronger than marijuana (and that depending on what we were doing). It probably saved mine and others lives. There are those who endorse the use of marijuana ok maybe, now cocaine. Where does it stop.

It stops when you stop using fallacious appeals to anecdotal evidence and look for real evidence.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Ironsides, evidently you are in some kind of military unit. You have some misconceptions about legalizing drugs. Legalization does not mean blanket legalization; it could still be banned in some instances.

Look at alcohol or tobacco. They re legal, but are prohibited in many circumstances. Just as you reported soldiers for drug use, I am sure you probably would report somebody for alcohol use as well (especially if done while on active duty). If you observed somebody taking a swig of alcohol while cocking his rifle, or while piloting the ship, I am sure you would report him.

So legalization of drugs means legalization under some conditions, with regulations controlling its use. Even if legal, drugs would still be subjected to similar restrictions as alcohol or tobacco.
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
Ironsides, evidently you are in some kind of military unit. You have some misconceptions about legalizing drugs. Legalization does not mean blanket legalization; it could still be banned in some instances.

Look at alcohol or tobacco. They re legal, but are prohibited in many circumstances. Just as you reported soldiers for drug use, I am sure you probably would report somebody for alcohol use as well (especially if done while on active duty). If you observed somebody taking a swig of alcohol while cocking his rifle, or while piloting the ship, I am sure you would report him.

So legalization of drugs means legalization under some conditions, with regulations controlling its use. Even if legal, drugs would still be subjected to similar restrictions as alcohol or tobacco.



I am a retired Marine. Cocaine is a long term addictive drug that effects someone for weeks or months. With alcohol, you stop drinking and within hours 24 at most your ready to resume normal duties unless of course your an alcoholic in which case your in rehab. Tobacco was never a problem. I do not want to see the goverment turn the genie loose.


 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
I do not want to see the goverment turn the genie loose.

Turn loose? It's already loose. By forcing users to go through channels connected to organized crime, you have measurably worse ancillary damage.
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
I'm open to any well thought out strategy to eradicate drug addiction (that includes to nicotine and alcohol). Whether it's done through criminalization, legalization, decriminalization, etc. is a secondary matter> I'll admit too that I'm relatively ignorant of the latest drug policy research in this field.
 

Niflmir

A modern nomad
Dec 18, 2006
3,460
58
48
Leiden, the Netherlands
I'm open to any well thought out strategy to eradicate drug addiction (that includes to nicotine and alcohol). Whether it's done through criminalization, legalization, decriminalization, etc. is a secondary matter> I'll admit too that I'm relatively ignorant of the latest drug policy research in this field.

Why exactly didn't you include caffeine or theobromine?

One cannot eradicate addiction, one can only deal with the problems that arise and prohibition fails to do so.
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
Turn loose? It's already loose. By forcing users to go through channels connected to organized crime, you have measurably worse ancillary damage.


Legalizing it will not stop organized crime, it will be taxed and those connected will get it cheaper, crime will just shift to something better that we will eventually be legalized also using the same argument down the road. . No one is being forced to do anything. There is no need for recreational drugs, if your live needs enhancement of some sort there are plenty of other ways to kill yourself without involving the public. Life alone should be all the feeling good you need.
 

unclepercy

Electoral Member
Jun 4, 2005
821
15
18
Baja Canada
Another nutty opinion

I am not interested in drugs, but I have thought for a long time that we ought to give judges the power to decide if a criminal was incorrigable. Hopeless, in other words.
Why doesn't the US and/or Canada buy an isolated island in the south Pacific somewhere, and dump them? Cuts down on the costs of keeping them in prison, and they can fight it out on their own turf. I'm not saying let them starve to death - send a ship by with supplies once a month.

I wonder what would happen.:roll: It also eliminates the death penalty, which so many of you dislike.

Uncle
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
People who read these forums know by now that I am fairly conservative. I do not use drugs. I do not smoke. I indulge in a daily fix for caffeine, and a weekly (admittedly, sometimes more frequent) partaking of alcohol.

I never touched any illegal drugs in my life. I would love to see them eradicated from the face of the Earth.

But I am also a realist. I know that it can not be done. I also know that joining those you can not beat is not necessarily a surrender, but perhaps a time out for regroup.

So, SURPRISE! I agree: let us legalize currently illegal drugs, tax the Hell out of the users of same. Let them pay for it more legally, than they pay for it now, illegally.

Why? Because that may give me a tax relief. I worked all my life, paid my taxes, hoped to enjoy my "golden years" only to find that year after year the Bernie Madoffs in Ottawa - aka CRA - tax me again and again in order to support the habitual freeloaders, hookers, pimps and addicts. Plus free abortions.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
People who read these forums know by now that I am fairly conservative. I do not use drugs. I do not smoke. I indulge in a daily fix for caffeine, and a weekly (admittedly, sometimes more frequent) partaking of alcohol.

I never touched any illegal drugs in my life. I would love to see them eradicated from the face of the Earth.

But I am also a realist. I know that it can not be done. I also know that joining those you can not beat is not necessarily a surrender, but perhaps a time out for regroup.

So, SURPRISE! I agree: let us legalize currently illegal drugs, tax the Hell out of the users of same. Let them pay for it more legally, than they pay for it now, illegally.

Why? Because that may give me a tax relief. I worked all my life, paid my taxes, hoped to enjoy my "golden years" only to find that year after year the Bernie Madoffs in Ottawa - aka CRA - tax me again and again in order to support the habitual freeloaders, hookers, pimps and addicts. Plus free abortions.

Jack you're threatening an important member of my medical team with eradication. Now if you were to suggest such a thing to the medical users of cannabis you would be drawn, quartered, staked. Some of those old people are very very militant about their medicine. I have a shock for you, one day soon cannabis will cost the same as potatoes and carrots two more drug laced evil vegetables, and children will eat it just as they did with cod liver oil.
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
darkbeaver, you quoted me, and then you came up with this:

"Jack you're threatening an important member of my medical team with eradication. Now if you were to suggest such a thing to the medical users of cannabis you would be drawn, quartered, staked. Some of those old people are very very militant about their medicine. I have a shock for you, one day soon cannabis will cost the same as potatoes and carrots two more drug laced evil vegetables, and children will eat it just as they did with cod liver oil."

Please clarify.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
darkbeaver, you quoted me, and then you came up with this:

"Jack you're threatening an important member of my medical team with eradication. Now if you were to suggest such a thing to the medical users of cannabis you would be drawn, quartered, staked. Some of those old people are very very militant about their medicine. I have a shock for you, one day soon cannabis will cost the same as potatoes and carrots two more drug laced evil vegetables, and children will eat it just as they did with cod liver oil."

Please clarify.

Many people have found the medicinal power of cannabis treats their diseases far better than synthetics. It is very important to them that it become easier and cheaper to get. The science is conclusive about the power of cannabis it is used by many in the treatment of cancer where it is widely reported as a cure in many many instances, particularly brain cancer.
Now the only reason at all for it's status as an ilegle substance is and was purely to protect the pharmasueticle industry and boost it's profits by denying redily available natural medicinals. It is a very effective medicine that has been kept from needy people. If not for the ilegle label there would be no crime associated with it and very little abuse. It would cost the same per pound as potatoes. Have you ever heard of viscious driveby shootings by potatoe or carrot gangs?