Fun stuff.That would be a buzz....
I used to sail off the cliffs near Thorne/Temiscaming ... catch an updraft and soar with the hawks....
Fun stuff.That would be a buzz....
I used to sail off the cliffs near Thorne/Temiscaming ... catch an updraft and soar with the hawks....
It was... Wish I had a strong enough heart (and big enough balls) to do it againFun stuff.
LOL, it's hilarious having a "discussion" with people on my ignore list.![]()
If you're going to put someone on ignore, actually ignore them. Don't troll around bragging about how you're ignoring people. Yuck.
It would take a revolution in particle physics to overturn the current scientific consensus on the existance of and human responsibility for Gloabal Warming and associated climate change.
Since there have been no external forcings: no Milankovitch cycles that are the source of Ice Ages.
You should probably stop crying about that. You embarrass yourself when you do.That is attacking the messenger.
If you're going to put someone on ignore, actually ignore them. Don't troll around bragging about how you're ignoring people. Yuck.
Like I said, this isn''t a game for me, if some people are here to screw with other peoples heads then who cares what they think.
That ignore button is cool, no more Lone Wolf.
How exactly are you planning on putting yourself on ignore?How about a little moderating on this thread, then I wouldn't feel the need to filter out the genuine trolls.
It would take a complete revision of our understanding of radiation, and falsifying the second law of thermodynamics. A whole lot of physics actually.
Oh, the Milankovitch forcing hasn't disappeared, it's just much smaller in magnitude than other forcings are right now. In fact the long-term (millenial) trend in the Arctic was cooling, until we began increasing the opacity of our atmosphere to the infrared radiation emitted by the surface. Read Kaufman et al. (2009).
You should give up on the fearmongering red,your wasting your time,everyone elses time and you havent even made a point yet,just parroted crap off the net.These ice sheets you talk of,when are they due?Which is my point.
The reduction of flow of longwave radiation out of the earth's atmosphere necessitates an overall warming of the atmosphere which to a large degree will be transfered to the much larger thermal mass of the oceans and bring about major shifts in the global climate as the oceans are one of the principle drivers of climate. Playing around with the uncertainty is tantamount ot rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic while claiming you're keeping it from sinking. Not only are you preventing people from saving themselves, you're doing it with the full knowledge of that fact. Climate change denial borders on the criminally negligent, especially when it's done by people in positions of authority. They actually have to have a pretty good understanding of the science to counter it, but no real appreciation or acceptance of the true human and ecological costs.
The most important Milankovitch forcing is also the smallest but acting over millenia results in massive build-up of ice sheets on the Northern Hemisphere as slightly more snow falls on average each year than melts. Negative feedbacks like the ice-albedo effect and increased uptake of water vapour and CO2 trigger accelerated cooling and glaciation. What we're doing is massive in magnitude when compared to a process that can eventually cover a significant portion of the globe in kms thick ice.
There's a reason people are very concerned...
I'm not bragging, the word I should have used was ridiculous. How pathetic do you have to be to endlessly troll a topic you essentially know nothing about, but don't want anyone else to be educated on either...even though it almost certainly will affect all our lives in a profound way.
For me yuck is gigatonnes of CO2 going into the atmosphere from the tar sands and megatonnes of toxic waste polluting a sizable portion of a place I love. You don't have to love oil to be a good Canadian.
As for trolling, although I haven't looked lately I'm willing to bet that some of the latest posts from Petros, LW and a few others I have on ignore probably deal with how insane, stupid I am or how I work for a competing oil company, which has nothing to do with the subject being discussed.
So you're right it's really not hilarious, more like sad.
How about a little moderating on this thread, then I wouldn't feel the need to filter out the genuine trolls.
You perhaps missed y saying that there were a couple of peer reviewed papers that posited a 'possibility' of global cooling. I also said why they thought it possible.It's about this comment
Sadly, AB just produces the stuff, the biggest markets that we sell to in Canada (via the USA) is Quebec and Ontario... Ironic, non?
In actuality, the specific example of yours that I had in mind related to the 'magazine articles' that he had posted regarding global climate crises. It seemed that there were 'peer reviewed' papers (for whatever that's worth these days) that provided the same message/results, but you offhandedly dismissed them as the source (apparently) was not to your liking.
Very little other than the major step proposed by Dion for a carbon tax. What agreements they did have I do not remember and it is not important now as Harper cancelled them.So what actions did Canada take? Signing an agreement isn't an action.
Please list what actions happened under the Liberals, other than words and vague promises.
I don;t think I said they had disappeared. I wrote about their effect.It would take a complete revision of our understanding of radiation, and falsifying the second law of thermodynamics. A whole lot of physics actually.
Oh, the Milankovitch forcing hasn't disappeared, it's just much smaller in magnitude than other forcings are right now. In fact the long-term (millenial) trend in the Arctic was cooling, until we began increasing the opacity of our atmosphere to the infrared radiation emitted by the surface. Read Kaufman et al. (2009).
Post #1601392 - Re: Oil Sand Myths Bad Redmonton_Rebel
There's positive proof you're full of shyte. You announced I was on your ignore list (and quite honoured to be first) now you neg rep a post you wouldn't be able to see if I actually were there. Shame on you fibber!
Post #1601387 - Re: Oil Sand Myths Bad Redmonton_Rebel
Twice, no less
I'm not bragging, the word I should have used was ridiculous. How pathetic do you have to be to endlessly troll a topic you essentially know nothing about, but don't want anyone else to be educated on either...even though it almost certainly will affect all our lives in a profound way.
For me yuck is gigatonnes of CO2 going into the atmosphere from the tar sands and megatonnes of toxic waste polluting a sizable portion of a place I love. You don't have to love oil to be a good Canadian.
As for trolling, although I haven't looked lately I'm willing to bet that some of the latest posts from Petros, LW and a few others I have on ignore probably deal with how insane, stupid I am or how I work for a competing oil company, which has nothing to do with the subject being discussed.
So you're right it's really not hilarious, more like sad.
How about a little moderating on this thread, then I wouldn't feel the need to filter out the genuine trolls.