really... just shoot me all the links for your claims and I will be more than happy to read them. I can also call a friend who did 6 years in the seminary to help me to understand the links.
: New pope elected is Pope Francis, Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio of Argentina.
- Thread starter Goober
- Start date
Yeah man. Mater and pater, yin yang, as above so below, good and evil, light and darkness, regular and unleaded . The Eucharist is the marriage of male and female. In this case God represented by the male Priest and the female Church.
The first conception of the world originated out of the energies of mind. "This is the sun within us," said the semanticists of old, "the seminal source of life. Do not dim its luster or cause it to suffer eclipse. Save your soul and do not sin against the treasure of light."
Imagery makes it a sowing of their seed upon the land, fertilizing it. The Greeks distinctly say that the gods scatter divinity upon earth, or sow the divine seed. Jesus does essentially the same thing in the ordination of the Eucharist. So the world was created from the drops of seminal solar essence that were ejected from the phallus of creative deity. The male creative fluid became the type of creative deity. It was said that the holy emanation that proceeds from Osiris vivifies gods, men and cattle. This was the blood-shedding of the Gods. In the case of Bata, the younger of the twins with his brother Anup, the phallus is torn away and thrown into the water and devoured by a fish. As the fish is a type of organic life floating in the sea of inorganic life, its swallowing of the emblem of creative power suggests the incarnation of soul in bodThe Ultimate Canon of Knowledge
Imagery makes it a sowing of their seed upon the land, fertilizing it. The Greeks distinctly say that the gods scatter divinity upon earth, or sow the divine seed. Jesus does essentially the same thing in the ordination of the Eucharist. So the world was created from the drops of seminal solar essence that were ejected from the phallus of creative deity. The male creative fluid became the type of creative deity. It was said that the holy emanation that proceeds from Osiris vivifies gods, men and cattle. This was the blood-shedding of the Gods. In the case of Bata, the younger of the twins with his brother Anup, the phallus is torn away and thrown into the water and devoured by a fish. As the fish is a type of organic life floating in the sea of inorganic life, its swallowing of the emblem of creative power suggests the incarnation of soul in bodThe Ultimate Canon of Knowledge
Male and female yes but only in these later explanations which prove to be misleading. The marriage is between spirit and body, father and mother, energy and matter. The meat of the allegory was the marriage of matter and energy into life. Of course it's all Egyptian to me.
Yup and Yup. and majik
Monroe Doctrine 1823
British invasion 1833
therefore, it was after the Doctrine
Kinda funny in that I recall certain right wingers in the 1960s saying Castro's rise to power came as a result of Russian interference and therefore violative of Monroe Doctrine. Yet these critics were nowhere to be found when the subject of the Malvinas came up.
Therefore you have not seen the Dates.
Also as the doctrine states England was not acquiring a new colony. Other wise they would have done something. Right?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falkland_Islands#History
In 1774, economic pressures leading up to the American Revolutionary War forced Great Britain to withdraw from many overseas settlements.[21][22] Upon withdrawal, the British left behind a plaque asserting Britain's continued claim. Spain maintained its governor until 1806 who, on his departure, left behind a plaque asserting Spanish claims. The remaining settlers were withdrawn in 1811.[21]
Monroe Doctrine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Monroe Doctrine was a policy of the United States introduced on December 2, 1823. It stated that further efforts by European nations to colonize land or interfere with states in North or South America would be viewed as acts of aggression, requiring U.S. intervention.The Doctrine noted that the United States would neither interfere with existing European colonies nor meddle in the internal concerns of European countries. The Doctrine was issued at a time when nearly all Latin American colonies of Spain and Portugal had achieved independence from the Spanish Empire (except Cuba and Puerto Rico) and the Portuguese Empire. The United States, working in agreement with Britain, wanted to guarantee no European power would move in.[2]
Last edited:
The new Pope is on the ropes of a shrinking church population because of the priests indiscretions.
I can't see much of a change in this pope, really, although he seems more apt to be popular than the last putz, er pontiff I mean.
New pope heralds 'hope and change' but you won't believe what he said about gays
Is the New Pope More Liberal Than the Last Two? Why It's Hard to Tell - Emily Chertoff - The Atlantic
New pope heralds 'hope and change' but you won't believe what he said about gays
Is the New Pope More Liberal Than the Last Two? Why It's Hard to Tell - Emily Chertoff - The Atlantic
Canada’s Marc Ouellet almost became pope
That doesn't surprise me. He is so highly respected by almost all of the prelates of the Church.. and is so prominently and centrally positioned at the confluence of all of the major eccliesiastical, theological, liturgical and evangelical streams of thought of the modern Church.. that when the white smoke appeared so early i thought he was the likely choice.
He made no secret of his reluctance to accept the post.. which might have been the only thing that held back his election.
As for 'a powerful new post'. It would be hard to get much more powerful than the Congregation of Bishops which he now heads. Although the Secretary of State and Prefect for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith technically are of higher precedence. He might be interested in the latter.. but not the former.
Benedict is widely acknowledged to have been the greatest theologian in the Papacy since Gregory the Great (who lived in the 6th Century). Maybe you should read one of his books before putzing around in your troll outfit, LG.
Last edited:
Red-herring. Did that make him popular with Catholics?
Ad hominem. And perhaps you should try discussing my point rather than hopping on the fallacious-argument wagon.Maybe you should read one of his books before putzing around in your troll outfit, LG.
Hmmmmmmm.......I didn't realize that being "popular" was a requirement for becoming Pope.
Actually, the Ad hominem came from you.