There was a lot of women they picked on. I doubt they'd do the same to some sixteen stone body builder with tattoos on his face.
Muslims patrol east London hunting down drinkers and immodestly dressed women
- Thread starter Blackleaf
- Start date
There was a lot of women they picked on. I doubt they'd do the same to some sixteen stone body builder with tattoos on his face.
Yes! After they have performed their services, delivered your drugs for the week and dropped off your alcohol...you are supposed to pay them. Otherwise it's theft and there something against it in the commandments.
None the less, the 8th commandment has now been broken perhaps multiple times. I think you might be going straight to hell.
ya mean the belligerent looking skin head... he looks like the opposite side of the same coin...They wouldn't stop this guy I am sure. His pit needs a shave too.
Actually no... The Nazis started destroying property and assaulting people based on their race/religion not their actions. It was easy to do, because many Germans already were racists and religiously intolerant at the time. What the Nazis did was use propaganda to promote negative stereotypes creating a poisoned atmosphere which was then exploited by a lunatic to grab power and advance his racist ideology. The masses went along with the lunatic's atrocities because they were manipulated by fear and hate or if they disagreed with the dictator, they kept quiet out of fear.
These people are religious zealots who think their religion is above the law and their actions reinforce negative stereotypes about Muslims.
BTW, Islam teaches respect for the law of the land:
Islamic FAQ - Islam
Strictly speaking these religious zealots are disobeying their religious teachings.
I am on the side of the law, not self appointed religious police.
Its pretty clear, you have no interest in debating my actual opinions. The point in your post is to smear me with opinions I don't have. In the future, why don't you quote me first, like I am quoting you and then explain why you disagree with my viewpoint rather than inventing crap about me. I've made many posts on this forum. If you disagree with something I've posted, you shouldn't have to look to hard to find it.
For the record:
I see nothing wrong with drinking alcohol in public. I am against being intoxicated in public.
I personally have nothing against public nudity, but I respect the right of parents to control what their children see and control their sexual education. So I support nude beaches and municipal zoning by-laws that allow nudity. If you don't want to see nudity, then don't go to that area.
I support freedom of religion, up to the point where that freedom imposes on the freedoms of others. I don't support self appointed religious zealots telling others how to live. If these religious zealots want to zone their area as off limits for alcohol and partial nudity, then they should work through their local government to have their neighborhood governed by special by-laws that reflect the resident's sensibilities. If you want to drink alcohol or walk around naked, then don't go to that neighborhood.
They wouldn't stop this guy I am sure.
The Spastics fans are everywhere.
If he had nipple rings he'd be on the ground in a millisecond.
Last edited:
Zealots come from every group and every nation. Once we start picking out and labelling
them to use as a definition of any group we are walking on shaky ground. Jews in NY,
Islamists in London, Westboro Baptists. Lets use these three examples.
Jews in NY, there are millions and a handful are Zealots that does not and should not
reflect on the Jewish community.
There are Muslim Zealots in London and millions in Britain that should not label them all
Westboro Baptists do not represent all Baptists.
I could go on but what is the point.
The one thing many of these groups have in common is they disregard the law of the land
and they should no longer even be regarded as Zealots when they breach such laws. The
word is Criminals and they should be treated as such and made an example of that we will
not tolerate Criminal behaviour. End of story
them to use as a definition of any group we are walking on shaky ground. Jews in NY,
Islamists in London, Westboro Baptists. Lets use these three examples.
Jews in NY, there are millions and a handful are Zealots that does not and should not
reflect on the Jewish community.
There are Muslim Zealots in London and millions in Britain that should not label them all
Westboro Baptists do not represent all Baptists.
I could go on but what is the point.
The one thing many of these groups have in common is they disregard the law of the land
and they should no longer even be regarded as Zealots when they breach such laws. The
word is Criminals and they should be treated as such and made an example of that we will
not tolerate Criminal behaviour. End of story
GASP!!!! Goyim minorities.
These Hasdics egos know no bounds. What's happening in London is nothing like what a blind eye is being turned to in Jew York
These aren' the types you can go knock back a couple He-Brews with (now on tap) at the neighbourhood pub.
In Israel they stone little girls. Greeeeeat guys.
Policing in New York should be left where in belongs, In the hands of Irish Catholics.
How do you figure? He's white and has short hair and has the English Flag painted on his face. He's a British Soccer (Football) fan.
Is this guy a racist? Is he wearing a symbol of national purity?
Should the same apply to the man above?
Nothing better meaning no better pictures of Canadians with their flag painted on their face? Like the one I posted of the British guy with the British flag on his face. There are many out their.
I thought the pic served the purpose. Short hair and the nations flag painted on his face. It was taken from the Olympics actually. The pic of the Brit was from a Brit soccer game.
I thought the pic served the purpose. Short hair and the nations flag painted on his face. It was taken from the Olympics actually. The pic of the Brit was from a Brit soccer game.
Well I just watched the video and though the voices I heard could be characterized as Muslim, I couldn't clearly see one of them. Thus, I will reserve judgement for as the narrator stated......maybe it was a bunch of right wing loonies.
Are these loonies any different than the ones espousing hatred toward our aboriginal peoples for wanting to take a stand for their rights? Loonies are everywhere, even here on CC.
That would be a no, Eagle..........but as I mentioned, I could not see anyone clearly in that vid.....so ....judgement reserved.
What do you really think?
I'll tell you what I think. It was a couple of Muslim thugs picking on easy targets, women, men walking alone, and a couple.
I'll tell you what I think. It was a couple of Muslim thugs picking on easy targets, women, men walking alone, and a couple.