Anything the Muslims want.2/3rds eh- What else could be banned that meets your banning standards.
EAO obviously supports a two tier legal system.
Anything the Muslims want.2/3rds eh- What else could be banned that meets your banning standards.
2/3rds eh- What else could be banned that meets your banning standards.
You said you support the law, not me.
I simply pointed out that you are forever apologizing for Muslims when they break the law.
No, you ignored the Judges reasons, and instead focused on the articles spin, while you came up with excuses for why a Muslim man would rape a 13 year old girl.
It's Ok, we're used to you.
Name calling is against the rules EAO. Don 't make me report you.
It's all there at the link you provided.Yet more lies.
Your lame excuse to break the rules aside. Does that mean I can start calling you a Jew hater?I'll stop calling you a liar when you stop lying.
I did, all at the link you provided.If you were honest, you'd quote me, rather than lie about what I said.
Nice edit.Try to stay on topic. The topic here isn't me or what I wrote in another thread.
Muslim paedophile who groomed victim on FB walks... - Page 4
It was your off topic post that brought us here.Try to stay on topic. The topic here isn't me or what I wrote in another thread.
Muslim paedophile who groomed victim on FB walks... - Page 4
I support the freedom of communities to pass by-laws that reflect the sensibilities of the community. Zoning by-laws could be used to allow as well as ban certain activities within limits (provincial/federal laws). Banning semi-nude advertising and public consumption of alcohol would probably reflect the will of more than just Muslim zealots. Other zealous religious groups including some Jews, Mormons and Christians. These groups and others would likely welcome by-laws for their neighborhoods prohibiting public nudity and consumption of alcohol.
I'd prefer the zones where nudity and recreational drug use is allowed and in general I would avoid overly conservative and religious neighborhoods. But if I did go to an area where public nudity was banned, I'd respect the law and put my clothes back on. Its not a big deal.
If I went to a neighborhood where marijuana possession/consumption was legal, I might even spark up a big fat doobie. But I wouldn't go inside a public building smoking marijuana as that would violate anti-smoking laws.
Yet more lies. I'll stop calling you a liar when you stop lying. If you were honest, you'd quote me, rather than lie about what I said.
Hence the two tiered legal system EAO wants.So as demographics change so do the laws. Really well thought out
Isn't this how the Nazi's started out in Germany except their target Jewish people and businesses?
Different rules for islam than everybody else:roll:Hence the two tiered legal system EAO wants.
It's a common theme in his posts.Different rules for islam than everybody else:roll:
Nazis didn't exist in a vacuum. They had hundreds of years of antisemitism to draw on and a lot of public support in Germany. Muslims in Britain are not even close to having the favourable conditions that the Nazis had in 1930s Germany. This isn't likely a precursor to a Islamic Fascist Britain, but that's OK because we can renounce religious oppression without comparing it to Nazism.
I also have no fear that Muslims are going to take over and create some sort of Islamic Fascist Britain. The actions of a few religious zealot thugs do no represent mainstream Islam, nor are they likely to enjoy popular support in the Muslim community, let alone other religious groups, atheists and agnostics.
More likely Islamaphobic hate propaganda could lead to poplar support for laws that oppress and discriminate against Muslims similar to laws in Nazi Germany that oppressed and discriminated against Jews.
I also have no fear that Muslims are going to take over and create some sort of Islamic Fascist Britain. The actions of a few religious zealot thugs do no represent mainstream Islam, nor are they likely to enjoy popular support in the Muslim community, let alone other religious groups, atheists and agnostics.
More likely Islamaphobic hate propaganda could lead to poplar support for laws that oppress and discriminate against Muslims similar to laws in Nazi Germany that oppressed and discriminated against Jews.
2/3rds eh- What else could be banned that meets your banning standards.