More than 1,000,000 people have died result of the US led Iraq invasion!

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
You are all still only guessing at how many may or may nor have ben killed if junior had not invaded. Perhaps there would have been one million Israilis killed. We don't know. How about some of the minorities that were in Iraq? Maybe there would be nothing left of them by now? But I guess you would be OK with that.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
That's some of the stupiest reasoning I'v ever read. So you murder a million Iraqis to save a non existant potential million Israeli deaths. Well I hope they're feeling safer now.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
You are all still only guessing at how many may or may nor have ben killed if junior had not invaded. Perhaps there would have been one million Israilis killed. We don't know. How about some of the minorities that were in Iraq? Maybe there would be nothing left of them by now? But I guess you would be OK with that.

War must be justified by facts. Unsupported speculation about the future could be used to justify nearly every war crime and crime against humanity ever committed.

My position is that war would be justified if Iraq actually had attacked another country. It might even be justified if Iraq was threatening to attack another country and diplomacy had failed. But at the time of the US invasion, Iraq wasn't attacking anyone or threatening to attack anyone. Iraq wasn't even a credible threat to anyone including Israel. UN weapon inspectors were about to officially declare that Iraq no longer possessed a WMD capability and was in compliance conditions for lifting economic sanctions. Two years before the invasion, both Powell and Rice claimed Iraq was no threat:
Both Colin Powell, US Secretary of State, and Condoleezza Rice, President Bush's closest adviser, made clear before September 11 2001 that Saddam Hussein was no threat - to America, Europe or the Middle East.

Humanitarian intervention might be warranted if the Iraq government was actually committing atrocities or about to commit atrocities. But at the time of the US invasion, Iraq was peaceful. The government wasn't even executing people convicted of capital crimes or treason, let alone crushing insurrections. No evidence exists to support your belief that Iraq was about to start committing atrocities.

Human Rights Watch
War in Iraq: Not a Humanitarian Intervention
By Ken Roth

...the Iraq war and the effort to justify it even in part in humanitarian terms risk giving humanitarian intervention a bad name...

...Human Rights Watch accepts that military intervention may be necessary not only to stop ongoing slaughter but also to prevent future slaughter, but the future slaughter must be imminent. To justify the extraordinary remedy of military force for preventive humanitarian purposes, there must be evidence that large-scale slaughter is in preparation and about to begin unless militarily stopped. But no one seriously claimed before the war that the Saddam Hussein government was planning imminent mass killing, and no evidence has emerged that it was...

...the invasion of Iraq failed to meet the test for a humanitarian intervention. Most important, the killing in Iraq at the time was not of the exceptional nature that would justify such intervention. In addition, intervention was not the last reasonable option to stop Iraqi atrocities. Intervention was not motivated primarily by humanitarian concerns. It was not conducted in a way that maximized compliance with international humanitarian law....

http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/pdfid/402ba99f4.pdf
 
Last edited:

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
More than 2,000,000 people died because of Pol Pot.
More than 30,000,000 people died because of Stalin.
More than 60,000,000 people died because of Mao Che Tung.

What is your point??
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
More than 2,000,000 people died because of Pol Pot.
More than 30,000,000 people died because of Stalin.
More than 60,000,000 people died because of Mao Che Tung.

What is your point??

You just made it. Bush is just as guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity as the people you listed.

If your point is that Bush isn't the greatest war criminal of all time, I would agree. He's probably in the top 20. However, he probably is the world's greatest living war criminal. Can you name someone living who is responsible for more innocent deaths as a result of starting an unprovoked war? I can't think of anyone off hand.

Some additional observations:

Americans never elected and re-elected any of the people you mention.

Many Americans still haven't recognized that Bush is in the same category as the people you listed.

Its unlikely Bush will ever be held accountable for his crimes, just like the people you list.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
You just made it. Bush is just as guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity as the people you listed.

No he is not.

If your point is that Bush isn't the greatest war criminal of all time, I would agree.

That's not his point.


He's probably in the top 20. However, he probably is the world's greatest living war criminal. Can you name someone living who is responsible for more innocent deaths as a result of starting an unprovoked war? I can't think of anyone off hand.

He's not even a war criminal

Some additional observations:

Americans never elected and re-elected any of the people you mention.

You're right.

Many Americans still haven't recognized that Bush is in the same category as the people you listed.

He's not

Its unlikely Bush will ever be held accountable for his crimes, just like the people you list.

What crimes?
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
No he is not.
That's not his point.
He's not even a war criminal
You're right.
He's not
What crimes?

Are you and Yukon Jack the same person or are you a mind reader? I believe Yukon Jack's point was that killing a million people is no big deal as other world leaders are responsible for far more deaths. Its just a few hundred thousand more than were killed in Rwanda.

Starting an unprovoked and unjustified war is a war crime. When pressed even the UN Secretary General had to admit it:
...In the interview, Mr. Annan was repeatedly asked whether the war was "illegal." "Yes," he finally said, "I have indicated it is not in conformity with the UN Charter, from our point of view, and from the Charter point of view it was illegal."...

http://www.un.org/apps/news/storyAr.asp?NewsID=11953&Cr=Iraq&Cr1
An illegal war is a war crime.

Consider this definition:

War of Aggression:
A war of aggression is a military conflict waged absent the justification of self-defense. Waging such a war of aggression is a crime under the customary international law...

...Wars without international legality (e.g. not out of self-defense, not sanctioned by the United Nations Security Council, and not sanctioned by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations) can be considered wars of aggression...

...The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, which followed World War II, called the waging of aggressive war "essentially an evil thing...to initiate a war of aggression...is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole."[1] Article 39 of the United Nations Charter provides that the Security Council shall determine the existence of any act of aggression and "shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security"....

War of aggression - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The case against George W. Bush is pretty overwhelming. But if you'd like to defend his actions.... feel free. I'd welcome the debate.
 
Last edited:

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
lol EA1, as much as people generally like to plunk GWB squarely at the top of the heap concerning the Iraq war issue, he was just a puppet. Cheney, Bremer, etc.'s puppet to be exact. Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeh
GWB doesn't have the wherewithall for that scale of craptitude.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
lol EA1, as much as people generally like to plunk GWB squarely at the top of the heap concerning the Iraq war issue, he was just a puppet. Cheney, Bremer, etc.'s puppet to be exact. Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeh
GWB doesn't have the wherewithall for that scale of craptitude.

I agree, the entire gang should be rounded up and brought before the Hague. George the Texacutioner Bush has it coming as much as anyone. But that will never happen unless the American people suddenly get a conscience. ES is typical.

But should any members of the Bush regime ever travel to Spain, they could be arrested:

Nobody Expects the Spanish Prosecution | Mother Jones

Canada also has similar laws as Spain regarding war crimes, crimes against humanity and universal jurisdiction. In theory Bush and Co. could also be arrested in Canada. Someone would have to make the case before a Canadian court.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
I agree, the entire gang should be rounded up and brought before the Hague. George the Texacutioner Bush has it coming as much as anyone. But that will never happen unless the American people suddenly get a conscience. ES is typical.

But should any members of the Bush regime ever travel to Spain, they could be arrested:

Nobody Expects the Spanish Prosecution | Mother Jones

Canada also has similar laws as Spain regarding war crimes, crimes against humanity and universal jurisdiction. In theory Bush and Co. could also be arrested in Canada. Someone would have to make the case before a Canadian court.
With the speed our various bureaucracies work, I'd be surprised if that procedure lasted any less than generations. And the culprits would laugh anyway.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Are you and Yukon Jack the same person or are you a mind reader?

Not to my knowledge.

Are you and Logic the same person? Quandry?

I believe Yukon Jack's point was that killing a million people is no big deal as other world leaders are responsible for far more deaths. Its just a few hundred thousand more than were killed in Rwanda.

I usually bring up Rwanda to turn tables on self righteous Canadians like yourself. Not ALL Canadians mind you. The ones that just make up figures (like 1 Million) and blame every death on the US.

So I just say "What about the 1 Million Rwandans that Canada killed"

Of course someone will say... "That's proposterous!"

I'll say "Why? You were there and in charge...so the deaths are your responsibility...just like it is ours in Iraq."

BaddaBING!

Starting an unprovoked and unjustified war is a war crime. When pressed even the UN Secretary General had to admit it:
An illegal war is a war crime.

Consider this definition:

War of Aggression:
The case against George W. Bush is pretty overwhelming. But if you'd like to defend his actions.... feel free. I'd welcome the debate.

Not overwhelming at all. Because George is in Texas on the ranch and no charges have been brought up.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
I agree, the entire gang should be rounded up and brought before the Hague. George the Texacutioner Bush has it coming as much as anyone. But that will never happen unless the American people suddenly get a conscience. ES is typical.

He doesn't have it coming. He's kicking back having a beer on the ranch!

But should any members of the Bush regime ever travel to Spain, they could be arrested:

Nobody Expects the Spanish Prosecution | Mother Jones

Spain dropped that silly arrest warrant. They aren't going to arrest ANYONE!

Canada also has similar laws as Spain regarding war crimes, crimes against humanity and universal jurisdiction. In theory Bush and Co. could also be arrested in Canada. Someone would have to make the case before a Canadian court.

Bush was just up in Canada and collected 150K of Loonies for speaking.

Lotsa talk...ZERO ACTION.

Bush and Co. at the Hague! :lol::lol::lol: