The US is a piker. The Christian god's killed zillions. The US has a long way to go before it's a god. Canadeh even farther.
You are all still only guessing at how many may or may nor have ben killed if junior had not invaded. Perhaps there would have been one million Israilis killed. We don't know. How about some of the minorities that were in Iraq? Maybe there would be nothing left of them by now? But I guess you would be OK with that.
War in Iraq: Not a Humanitarian Intervention
By Ken Roth
...the Iraq war and the effort to justify it even in part in humanitarian terms risk giving humanitarian intervention a bad name...
...Human Rights Watch accepts that military intervention may be necessary not only to stop ongoing slaughter but also to prevent future slaughter, but the future slaughter must be imminent. To justify the extraordinary remedy of military force for preventive humanitarian purposes, there must be evidence that large-scale slaughter is in preparation and about to begin unless militarily stopped. But no one seriously claimed before the war that the Saddam Hussein government was planning imminent mass killing, and no evidence has emerged that it was...
...the invasion of Iraq failed to meet the test for a humanitarian intervention. Most important, the killing in Iraq at the time was not of the exceptional nature that would justify such intervention. In addition, intervention was not the last reasonable option to stop Iraqi atrocities. Intervention was not motivated primarily by humanitarian concerns. It was not conducted in a way that maximized compliance with international humanitarian law....
http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/pdfid/402ba99f4.pdf
Is that a guess or an estimate supported by scientific methodolgy?I'd say about 50% think like you here in America.
Is that a guess or an estimate supported by scientific methodolgy?
;-)
I wish your attitude was an exception ES, but I believe most Americans share your apathy.
.
More than 2,000,000 people died because of Pol Pot.
More than 30,000,000 people died because of Stalin.
More than 60,000,000 people died because of Mao Che Tung.
What is your point??
Is that a guess or an estimate based on scientific methodology? ;-)
You just made it. Bush is just as guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity as the people you listed.
If your point is that Bush isn't the greatest war criminal of all time, I would agree.
He's probably in the top 20. However, he probably is the world's greatest living war criminal. Can you name someone living who is responsible for more innocent deaths as a result of starting an unprovoked war? I can't think of anyone off hand.
Some additional observations:
Americans never elected and re-elected any of the people you mention.
Many Americans still haven't recognized that Bush is in the same category as the people you listed.
Its unlikely Bush will ever be held accountable for his crimes, just like the people you list.
No he is not.
That's not his point.
He's not even a war criminal
You're right.
He's not
What crimes?
An illegal war is a war crime....In the interview, Mr. Annan was repeatedly asked whether the war was "illegal." "Yes," he finally said, "I have indicated it is not in conformity with the UN Charter, from our point of view, and from the Charter point of view it was illegal."...
http://www.un.org/apps/news/storyAr.asp?NewsID=11953&Cr=Iraq&Cr1
The case against George W. Bush is pretty overwhelming. But if you'd like to defend his actions.... feel free. I'd welcome the debate.A war of aggression is a military conflict waged absent the justification of self-defense. Waging such a war of aggression is a crime under the customary international law...
...Wars without international legality (e.g. not out of self-defense, not sanctioned by the United Nations Security Council, and not sanctioned by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations) can be considered wars of aggression...
...The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, which followed World War II, called the waging of aggressive war "essentially an evil thing...to initiate a war of aggression...is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole."[1] Article 39 of the United Nations Charter provides that the Security Council shall determine the existence of any act of aggression and "shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security"....
War of aggression - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
lol EA1, as much as people generally like to plunk GWB squarely at the top of the heap concerning the Iraq war issue, he was just a puppet. Cheney, Bremer, etc.'s puppet to be exact. Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeh
GWB doesn't have the wherewithall for that scale of craptitude.
With the speed our various bureaucracies work, I'd be surprised if that procedure lasted any less than generations. And the culprits would laugh anyway.I agree, the entire gang should be rounded up and brought before the Hague. George the Texacutioner Bush has it coming as much as anyone. But that will never happen unless the American people suddenly get a conscience. ES is typical.
But should any members of the Bush regime ever travel to Spain, they could be arrested:
Nobody Expects the Spanish Prosecution | Mother Jones
Canada also has similar laws as Spain regarding war crimes, crimes against humanity and universal jurisdiction. In theory Bush and Co. could also be arrested in Canada. Someone would have to make the case before a Canadian court.
Are you and Yukon Jack the same person or are you a mind reader?
I believe Yukon Jack's point was that killing a million people is no big deal as other world leaders are responsible for far more deaths. Its just a few hundred thousand more than were killed in Rwanda.
Starting an unprovoked and unjustified war is a war crime. When pressed even the UN Secretary General had to admit it:
An illegal war is a war crime.
Consider this definition:
War of Aggression:
The case against George W. Bush is pretty overwhelming. But if you'd like to defend his actions.... feel free. I'd welcome the debate.
I agree, the entire gang should be rounded up and brought before the Hague. George the Texacutioner Bush has it coming as much as anyone. But that will never happen unless the American people suddenly get a conscience. ES is typical.
But should any members of the Bush regime ever travel to Spain, they could be arrested:
Nobody Expects the Spanish Prosecution | Mother Jones
Canada also has similar laws as Spain regarding war crimes, crimes against humanity and universal jurisdiction. In theory Bush and Co. could also be arrested in Canada. Someone would have to make the case before a Canadian court.