Mayor refuses to remove swastikas from park

White_Unifier

Senate Member
Feb 21, 2017
7,300
2
36
Perhaps, but I think the Nazi one was ripped off from the pre-Nazi European Swastika, not the Hindu one.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
57,984
8,284
113
Washington DC
Isn't there an angle difference between the 2 symbols as well?
The swastika can also have the arms going in the other direction.

But no, the Hackenkreuz need not be angled.

 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,228
5,847
113
Olympus Mons
This is high-larious! Your ongoing and utterly doomed attempt to defend the Nazis just gets more and more desperate.
Here, let me repeat what I said to Curious Cnd with some appropriate emphasis.
See, you're part of the idiot problem. The swastika has been a symbol of peace, good luck and positivity for 11,000 years but you're going to let 12 years of some asshole co-opting the symbol for his own nefarious purposes dictate the meaning to you.

If calling them assholes and nefarious is your idea of defending them, I sure as f*ck hope you weren't a public defender.

OK, so as I understand it, your usual bellow about how immigrants should assimilate and adopt the language, customs, and culture of their new country has an exception for the Su-Asti,?
Fixed that for you. Feel free to look up the meaning.
 

Bar Sinister

Executive Branch Member
Jan 17, 2010
8,252
19
38
Edmonton
The bloody anchor is a trophy of war. It wouldn't have much meaning without the swastika. I own a holster with a swastika on it and a German eagle as well. My father took it from the body of a dead officer during WW II.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Historical statues and monuments should not be taken down, but instead should come with a more accurate picture of who they were and/or the historical context it represents and if the guy was a psychotic asshole like Columbus there should be a disclaimer to that effect attached to the statue.
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
Holy sh it. This guy took it upon himself to pressure wash the anchor.....

In a little Canadian town, a battle is being waged over a swastika-adorned anchor, which is prominently displayed in a public park. There is one caveat, however: while its plaque identifies the artifact as being from the World War II era, an investigation shows that the anchor appears to be of British pre-war origin, and its swastika may have been inscribed as a benign symbol of good luck.

As Jason Magder reports for the Montreal Gazette, the anchor sits in a nautical-themed park in the town of Pointe-des-Cascades, Quebec. The park is located next to a museum dedicated to the maritime history of the St. Lawrence River and the Soulanges Canal.

A plaque in front of the anchor erected by the local historical society explains that the relic was discovered in 1988 in Quebec’s Lac St-Louis. The plaque also claims that the anchor dates to WWII, and that the swastika embossed onto one of its flukes "seems to denote the ship’s country of origin" (Germany, in other words). Though journalistic investigations over the past few days have revealed that this information about the anchor’s provenance is likely incorrect, when the activist Corey Fleischer first encountered the anchor last week, he had every reason to believe it was stamped with an authentic Nazi symbol.


The Montreal resident, who runs a power-washing business, is the founder of an initiative called Erasing Hate, where he is often called upon to remove hate symbols that have been graffitied onto public property, according to the CBC.

Fleischer tells Smithsonian.com that when he arrived in Pointe-des-Cascades, he saw that the anchor appeared to have been freshly painted. “I walk into this park and I see this anchor ... that's painted immaculately [in] three colors,” Fleischer says. The body of the anchor was beige, and on its left fluke was a black swastika surrounded by a white circle.

He began using his equipment to scrub the paint, hoping to make the swastika less visible. While he was working, he was stopped by the town mayor, Gilles Santerre, who phoned the police.

A video of the interaction shows a police officer explaining that Fleischer cannot alter the anchor because “it’s not yours.”

“It’s part of our history,” a second officer says.

“It doesn’t matter if it’s part of our history,” Fleischer replies. “This should not be in a park displayed with kids, with grandparents.”

As news of the conflict spread, Marc Montgomery of Radio Canada International published an investigation arguing that the swastika in question was not in fact a Nazi symbol. It pre-dates WWII, he claims, and was one of many anchors manufactured by W.L. Byers of Sunderland, England, starting in the late 1800s.

“[Byers] was apparently fascinated by the swastika, as were a great many people and organizations of the time, by this symbol found on pottery unearthed by archaeologists at Troy and which is believed to be an ancient sign both there and in India for good luck and auspiciousness,” Montgomery writes, noting the company discontinued its use of the swastika when the Nazis appropriated the symbol.

In a statement, the mayor of Pointe-des-Cascades says he is committed to installing a plaque that better explains the anchor’s history, according to the CBC. Santerre also notes that that the town “does not endorse Nazism.”

But correcting the plaque’s historical inaccuracies isn’t enough to satisfy Fleischer. Since it was re-painted by the town, he says, the anchor has borne a prominent black swastika surrounded by a white circle. “This is something that Hitler used on his flags,” Fleischer explains. “This is something that is notorious.”

The design was indeed espoused by Hitler. In Mein Kampf, according to the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, the Führer described his vision for what would become the Nazi emblem: “a flag with a red background, a white disk, and a black swastika in the middle.”

Fleischer also contends that the anchor belongs in a museum, not in a public park where it might upset unsuspecting passersby. “The last thing that I'm trying to do is erase any history,” he says, but adds that the swastika “is no longer a sign of just peace.”

“This is a sign that Hitler used to massacre and almost erase an entire population of people,” he says. “There is no room for any swastikas ... to be in a public space.”

Read more

Canadian Town
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,197
113
Lets get rid of the reds blacks and whites then..those colors...
:)
this guy is one messed up closet racist isn't he?

lol
A British anchor..the kings and queens of racial bigotry and empire right there!
So...Let's ban BRITAIN!...
( lol, you all know that Winston Churchill was a founding member of the communist/nazi EU eh?)
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
57,984
8,284
113
Washington DC
Getting rid of the eagle as your national symbol anytime soon? No? Then thanks for playing. We have some lovely parting gifts for you including a home version of the game.
If we do, it should be because of our own conduct. Certainly not because the Nazis used a golden eagle, a completely different species from the bald eagle.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,

Morti

Time Out
Aug 28, 2017
50
0
6
You guys....and you know who you are.

The ones that went after some members here and rightly so for going after "Jooos" won't lift a finger now to denegrate the azzholes who marched in Charlottesville because you may just have to hold hands with those that oppose them.

In the words of a not so great leader....SAD.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
Historical statues and monuments should not be taken down, but instead should come with a more accurate picture of who they were and/or the historical context it represents and if the guy was a psychotic asshole like Columbus there should be a disclaimer to that effect attached to the statue.

while I agree that statues should not be pulled as I see it as akin to book burning who do you propose should provide the historical context? Someone with a bit of knowledge or some PC fascist that wants to rewrite history?
 

Morti

Time Out
Aug 28, 2017
50
0
6
while I agree that statues should not be pulled as I see it as akin to book burning who do you propose should provide the historical context? Someone with a bit of knowledge or some PC fascist that wants to rewrite history?

Okay.

How would you revise the plaque on the statue of Robert E Lee considering you have no agenda at all?