Sure, go ahead, try and shift the conversation to 'rights and freedoms', because you think you can absolve yourself of complicity in crime, and living off the avails of crime....I understand that First Nations people have treaty "rights" that I don't have. I accept it as part of the price for peace with First Nations people. Maintaining these additional rights and freedoms is fair and just. Taking away these fights and freedoms would be like breaking our word.
Not living up to the contracts, is breaking your word.
The invasion of traditional lands, that were contractually protect, is breaking your word.
Removing our form of government and installing your own, and impeding our self determination, is a crime against humanity.
Living on land without fear of violence, or reprisal, just because a longer amount of time and injustice has transpired, doesn't negate the fact that you are a hypocrite.
400 years from now, Israel and Palestine, may have the same situation.
That isn't what I said.My point is that CB is stretching reality if he thinks he can argue that current First Nation rights and freedoms are less or equal to current Palestinian rights and freedoms.
I said both suffer, differently.
But I don't mind entertaining your silly dishonest attempt further...
Your justification of why it's OK for you to stay here, is no different than the silly notion Gawd left it to us.
You can try and use the right to hunt, fish and harvest wood unimpeded, while the areas we hunt, fish and harvest wood are being destroyed in the name of progress. To justify your hypocrisy further, but you just look foolish, while you further prove my observation, of your moral relativism and hypocrisy, to be absolutely true.
Last edited: