What does it mean when five D.C. kids are shot and there’s no outcry?
By Courtland Milloy,
http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/courtland-milloy Columnist, June 21
The wealthier the District becomes, the uglier it gets for those in the poorest neighborhoods of the city.
Nothing illustrates that more than the city’s pathologically high tolerance for children being shot.
In February, a 2-year-old boy was with his mother at a beauty salon in Northwest Washington
when a stray bullet shattered the front window and grazed his neck.
In March, a 6-year-old girl was walking with another person behind some apartment buildings when she was struck in the wrist by a stray bullet.
On April 6, a 6-year-old boy was shot twice in the arm when two people forced open the front door of his apartment in Northeast and began firing.
Two days later, a 7-year-old girl was struck in the abdomen by a stray bullet as she walked with her parents near their home in Southeast.
Then just last month, an 8-year-old boy was struck in the back when someone got out of a car and began firing in his direction.
Was there an uproar from elected officials? What about the city’s residents? Put it like this: In the new, gentrified Washington, the arrival of a celebrity chef gets more attention than a kid with a gunshot wound to the gut.
For each of those children, the difference between life and death was just a matter of inches. The 7-year-old girl was airlifted to Children’s National Medical Center, where her physical condition was later upgraded to fair.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...pid=hp_local-news_milloy-225am:homepage/story
It means the righties don't care at all, and the lefties only care if they're shot with an "assault weapon."
And nobody cares as long as they're black.