It's time to ban assault weapons in the U.S.

JamesBondo

House Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,158
37
48
In order to have freedom and liberty, others must have it,too. I think that is the part that terrifies libtards
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
It's okay Colpy.

I don't think we should remove the right to bear arms from the constitution.


We can just rename it to the right to bear certain arms.


Then, in about 20 years, when most of the special people are dead, we can remove it completely. :D

Okay.

Rename it.

But first you have to get the approval of 2/3 of the Senate, 2/3 of the House, and ratification by 37 states.

The President has absolutely no role and no say. The amendment becomes law as soon as it is ratified by the prerequisite number of states.

Good luck. You could not get one state to ratify a change to the Bill of Rights.

The Bill of Rights is the way it is because the people want it that way...........something the left conveniently forgets.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,611
9,643
113
Washington DC
It's just that this freak show of un-Canadian hillbillies advocating armed isurrection here because of some fukced-up, decaying country next door is really pissing me off. We have our own history and our own path.
How special is your pedigree to be calling somebody else a hillbilly?

You don't have your own history and your own path. You're just another bunch of European genocides pretending you're special.

Well the constitution needs to be fixed then because it's pretty dumb.


48 people were shot during a 15-hour filibuster on gun control - Vox
You get right on that, mmm-kay?
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
It's okay Colpy.

I don't think we should remove the right to bear arms from the constitution.


We can just rename it to the right to bear certain arms.


Then, in about 20 years, when most of the special people are dead, we can remove it completely. :D
Slingshot?? I would hate to go up against somebody with one and they know how to use the steel ball-bearing ammo that it fires.
 

Corduroy

Senate Member
Feb 9, 2011
6,670
2
36
Vancouver, BC
Trump is a ****ing liar.

Trump has NEVER been a Conservative.

Trump would sacrifice Babies if it got him a step closer to the White House.

Trump supported the Clintons right up to the point he decided to run for President.

Trump supported the old (unconstitutional and completely ineffective) Assault Weapons Ban.

Trump is a con man and a thief.

Trump is a human turd.

Il Duce (or Il Douche, take your pick)

The only question is whether Hillary is worse.

Gary Johnson, ladies and gentlemen. Not much, but the best offered.

Is Trump scum?
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Then, in about 20 years, when most of the special people are dead, we can remove it completely.

Like the baby boomers? :iconbiggrin:

How special is your pedigree to be calling somebody else a hillbilly?

You don't have your own history and your own path. You're just another bunch of European genocides pretending you're special.

It looks like Curious CDN spent the whole weekend being dumb as sh*t!
 

bluebyrd35

Council Member
Aug 9, 2008
2,373
0
36
Ormstown.Chat.Valley
Of course flossy would not want to ban the most efficient killing machine humanity has.....the automobile. You can purchase one anywhere without a license.
Can't drive it without a license though. Also, the new autos coming out will be truly automatic, no collisions because the car will take over before that happens. We already have warnings when one goes over the line without signaling, when the car needs servicing, low tire pressure etc. I can foresee, eventually, the car not starting or continues to operate if one is intoxicated, becomes ill, or starts performing erratically.

So why not sell all guns with owner recognition by palm prints, special rings or other methods of controlling who gets to use them. Anyway, I understand the gun company being sued for the Sandy Hook massacre lost it's bid to have the suit thrown out. Seems fair to me, since cars manufacturers, building contractors and many other producers/ manufacturers or companies are liable for the damage their products do.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Hillary's way better.

It's not even a question.

Okay...

Hillary has taken corruption to entirely new levels.

I mean, set aside for a moment the fact the Clintons stole $35,000 worth of furniture when they left the White House (seriously, they did)........ignore Hillary enabling her husband's sexual assaults and her vendettas against Bill's victims.....forget $200,000 plus speaking fees for Wall Street companies (that is not a fee, it is a bribe), pretend you never noticed that Hillary can not tell the truth in two consecutive sentences, and skip over the fact of her law-breaking and incredible security breaches in the e-mail affair..........ignore all that......

Just read this, from a notoriously liberal newspaper, the New York Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

Trump and Clinton are almost enough to make me appreciate Mick's little bastard.

Almost.

If Clinton hasn't achieve scumdom she's at least dented that scum glass ceiling.



scum.

Hillary, like Donald, aspires to be pond scum.
 

Ludlow

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 7, 2014
13,588
0
36
wherever i sit down my ars
Okay...

Hillary has taken corruption to entirely new levels.

I mean, set aside for a moment the fact the Clintons stole $35,000 worth of furniture when they left the White House (seriously, they did)........ignore Hillary enabling her husband's sexual assaults and her vendettas against Bill's victims.....forget $200,000 plus speaking fees for Wall Street companies (that is not a fee, it is a bribe), pretend you never noticed that Hillary can not tell the truth in two consecutive sentences, and skip over the fact of her law-breaking and incredible security breaches in the e-mail affair..........ignore all that......

Just read this, from a notoriously liberal newspaper, the New York Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

Trump and Clinton are almost enough to make me appreciate Mick's little bastard.

Almost.



Hillary, like Donald, aspires to be pond scum.
Society creates these pukes no one to blame but us so shut the fookin whining.:).
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,611
9,643
113
Washington DC
Okay...

Hillary has taken corruption to entirely new levels.

I mean, set aside for a moment the fact the Clintons stole $35,000 worth of furniture when they left the White House (seriously, they did)........ignore Hillary enabling her husband's sexual assaults and her vendettas against Bill's victims.....forget $200,000 plus speaking fees for Wall Street companies (that is not a fee, it is a bribe), pretend you never noticed that Hillary can not tell the truth in two consecutive sentences, and skip over the fact of her law-breaking and incredible security breaches in the e-mail affair..........ignore all that......

Just read this, from a notoriously liberal newspaper, the New York Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

Trump and Clinton are almost enough to make me appreciate Mick's little bastard.

Almost.



Hillary, like Donald, aspires to be pond scum.
Not to detract from what you posted, but as corruption goes, that's pretty small potatoes down hereabouts.