Israel...

einmensch

Electoral Member
Mar 1, 2008
937
14
18
Thanks for your Intelligent opinion, Colpy. Very amusing. Have you tried clowning or a stand up comedy routine?
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Thanks for your Intelligent opinion, Colpy. Very amusing. Have you tried clowning or a stand up comedy routine?

Oh you're welcome.

But I'll leave the clowning to the clowns...............you know, the guys so stupid they believe the USA is still occupying a Germany....that has no Constitution.

Speaking of which, I don't even think you are insulting the correct poster......

(sighs....rolls eyes)

It Figures.
 

dancing-loon

House Member
Oct 8, 2007
2,739
36
48
Top Olmert Aide Puts New Pressure on Him to Quit


Pressure on Prime Minister Ehud Olmert of Israel to step down increased Thursday when Tzipi Livni, his foreign minister and a member of the same political party, urged preparations for new elections.

Ms. Livni — who until now had kept silent on the high-profile corruption investigation engulfing Mr. Olmert — said their party, Kadima, was “at a point in which it must make decisions and prepare for any scenario, including early elections.”

The remarks by Ms. Livni, who is a frontrunner to succeed Mr. Olmert, seemed to be a political step designed to move Israeli politics into a post-Olmert era.

Ms. Livni’s statement, which was reported widely on Israeli news Web sites, was less emphatic than Mr. Barak’s, in that she did not call explicitly for the prime minister to resign.
Yet her comments carry weight because she is the first senior member of Mr. Olmert’s own party to question his leadership during the current corruption inquiry.

Full article here: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/30/wo...hp&oref=slogin
---------------------------------------------------
She seems to have a cool head, but would she make a better PM? Anything less than giving the Palestinians their land back and compensate them for the damage, the pain and suffering is useless and won't end the hostilities, nor better Israel's image as a bully!
I would like to see the Orthodox Jews come to power, who recognize the sin the Zionists are committing against the Palestinians and the world.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
The Nazis coordinated an attack on Jewish people and their property in Germany and German-controlled lands as a part of Hitler's anti-Semitic policy.

The Israeli's coordinated an attack on Arab Militants who have been firing rockets at Israeli citizens every freakin' day for like two years now.


End of parallel.

Even Israelis can see the parallels:

Jewish MP compares Gaza to Warsaw ghetto



Press Association
June 19, 2003



Israel's treatment of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip was today compared to the Nazis' creation of the Warsaw ghetto by MPs who recently returned from the region.

The controversial comparison, drawn by Oona King and Jenny Tonge, will anger the pro-Israel lobby and the visiting Israeli finance minister, Benyamin Netanyahu, who met Tony Blair at Downing Street this morning.

Labour MP Ms King, who is Jewish, said Gaza was "the same in nature" as the infamous Polish ghetto.

"No government should be behaving like that - least of all a Jewish government," the Bethnal Green and Bow MP said.

Ms King and Liberal Democrat MP Dr Tonge were holding a Westminster press conference today following their fact-finding trip.

The pair were caught up in the aftermath of the Israeli gunship assassination attack on a leading Palestinian extremist. A building they were in just minutes earlier was hit in retaliation.

The MPs were also confronted by an Israeli soldier armed with a grenade as they tried to leave the strip.

Speaking ahead of the press conference, Ms King said the visit, organised by Christian Aid, had opened her eyes.

The MP, a member of the Jewish Council for Racial Equality, said: "I recognise the terror many Israelis live with as a matter of their daily lives.

"I was more surprised perhaps by the everyday terror that Palestinians live, the detail and nature of which I had not understood.

"We must support the moderate voices as opposed to strengthening extremists."

Referring to Warsaw, scene of the historic uprising by its Jewish inhabitants, Ms King said: "It is the same in nature but not extent."

She stressed the "very, very big difference" between Gaza and the infamous ghetto established by the Nazis in Poland's capital.

"Palestinians are not being rounded up and put in gas chambers," she said.

But the MP said: "What makes it similar is what happened to the Jewish people in that time which was the seizing of land, being forced from property, torture and bureaucracy - control used in a demeaning way over the smallest task.

"On top of that building a wall around them - and that is precisely what the Israeli government is doing. In doing so it is building a political ghetto. I don't think it can escape that conclusion."

Ms King also said: "As a Jewish person, I hoped I would never live to see the day I was ashamed of the actions of the Jewish state."...

http://www.inminds.co.uk/boycott-news-0392.html

No its not exactly the same. But its close enough...
 

dancing-loon

House Member
Oct 8, 2007
2,739
36
48
Talk about living in a ghetto...

GAZA — The American State Department has withdrawn all Fulbright grants to Palestinian students in Gaza hoping to pursue advanced degrees at American institutions this fall because Israel has not granted them permission to leave.

Israel has isolated this coastal strip, which is run by the militant group Hamas. Given that policy, the United States Consulate in Jerusalem said the grant money had been “redirected” to students elsewhere out of concern that it would go to waste if the Palestinian students were forced to remain in Gaza.

A letter was sent by e-mail to the students on Thursday telling them of the cancellation. Abdulrahman Abdullah, 30, who had been hoping to study for an M.B.A. at one of several American universities on his Fulbright, was in shock when he read it.

“If we are talking about peace and mutual understanding, it means investing in people who will later contribute to Palestinian society,” he said. “I am against Hamas. Their acts and policies are wrong. Israel talks about a Palestinian state. But who will build that state if we can get no training?”

Read on about Israel's reaction here: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/30/wo...hp&oref=slogin
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Zionists!! I can only shake my head!
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Amnesty International Annual Report regarding Israel and the Occupied Territories

STATE OF ISRAEL

Head of State Shimon Peres (replaced Moshe Katzav in June)
Head of government Ehud Olmert
Death penalty abolitionist for ordinary crimes
Population 7 million (Israel); 3.9 million (OPT)
Life expectancy 80.3 years (Israel); 72.9 years (OPT)
Under-5 mortality (m/f)6/5 per 1,000 (Israel); 23/18 per 1,000 (OPT)
Adult literacy97.1 per cent (Israel); 92.4 per cent (OPT)

The human rights situation in the Israeli Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) remained dire. Israeli forces killed more than 370 Palestinians, destroyed more than 100 Palestinian homes and imposed ever more stringent restrictions on the movement of Palestinians. In June, the Israeli government imposed an unprecedented blockade on the Gaza Strip, virtually imprisoning its entire 1.5 million population, subjecting them to collective punishment and causing the gravest humanitarian crisis to date. Some 40 Palestinians died after being refused passage out of Gaza for urgent medical treatment not available in local hospitals. Most Gazans were left dependent on international aid for survival but UN aid agencies complained that the Israeli blockade made it difficult for them to provide the much needed assistance. In the West Bank, the Israeli authorities continued to expand illegal settlements and build a 700-km fence/wall in violation of international law. Impunity remained the norm for Israeli soldiers and Israeli settlers who committed serious abuses against Palestinians, including unlawful killings, physical assaults and attacks on property. Thousands of Palestinians were arrested, most of whom were released without charge. Those charged with security-related offences often received unfair trials before military courts. Some 9,000 Palestinian adults and children remained in Israeli jails, some of whom had been held without charge or trial for years. Attacks by Palestinian armed groups killed 13 Israelis (see Palestinian Authority entry).

Background
In January, President Moshe Katzav took leave of absence after the Attorney General announced he would be charged with rape. The President resigned in June after striking a plea bargain in which he admitted responsibility for lesser offences, including sexual harassment, indecent assault and harassment of a witness, in exchange for agreement that the rape charges would be dropped and he would be spared prison. One of the plaintiffs petitioned the Supreme Court to set aside the plea bargain, and women’s rights organizations called for Moshe Katzav to face trial. The case remained pending. In June, Vice Prime Minister Shimon Peres was elected President.

The Israeli government resumed talks with the Palestinian Authority (PA) and in November the two sides participated in an international meeting in Annapolis, sponsored by the US government, about resuming peace negotiations. However, no concrete measures were announced at the meeting. Prior Israeli undertakings to ease movement restrictions on Palestinians and to remove some Israeli settlement “outposts” had not materialized by the end of the year. In December, the Israeli authorities announced further expansion of Israeli settlements in the OPT, in violation of international law.

Killings of Palestinians
Frequent air strikes and other attacks by Israeli forces killed more than 370 Palestinians, including some 50 children, and injured thousands more. The Israeli authorities maintained their strikes were in response to “Qassam” rocket and mortar attacks by Gaza-based Palestinian armed groups against nearby southern Israeli towns and villages and against Israeli army positions along the perimeter of the Gaza Strip. More than half of the Palestinians killed by Israeli forces were armed militants who were participating in armed confrontations or attacks, or who were extrajudicially executed in air strikes. The rest were unarmed civilians not involved in the hostilities. Some 50 children were among those killed.
  • Five children were killed by Israeli missiles in two separate incidents in Beit Hanoun, northern Gaza, in August. Mahmoud, Sara and Yahia Abu Ghazal, aged eight, nine and 11, were killed on 29 August while grazing their sheep, and Fadi Mansour al-Kafarna and ‘Abd al-Qader ‘Ashour, aged 11 and 13, were killed and a third child was injured on 21 August while playing in a field.
  • Zaher al-Majdalawi and Ahmad Abu Zubaidah, aged 13 and 14, were killed on 1 June as they were flying kites on the beach in Beit Lahia, northern Gaza.
Killings of Israelis
Seven Israeli civilians and six soldiers were killed by Palestinian armed groups, the lowest annual fatality figure since the outbreak of the intifada in 2000.
  • Shirel Friedman and Oshri Oz were killed in Sderot by “Qassam” rocket attacks on 21 and 27 May.
Justice system
Detentions
Thousands of Palestinians, including scores of children, were detained by Israeli forces in the OPT. The majority of those arrested were later released without charge, but hundreds were accused of security offences. Some 9,000, including more than 300 children and Palestinians arrested in previous years, remained imprisoned at the end of 2007. More than 900 were held in administrative detention without charge or trial, including some held since 2002. Among those detained were dozens of former ministers in the Hamas-led PA government and Hamas parliamentarians and mayors who were seemingly held to exert pressure on Hamas to release Gilad Shalit, an Israeli soldier captured in 2006 who continued to be held in Gaza by the armed wings of Hamas and the Popular Resistance Committees (PRC).

Almost all the Palestinian detainees continued to be held in jails inside Israel, in violation of international humanitarian law, which bars the removal of detainees to the territory of the occupying power.

In October, following a habeas corpus petition filed by a human rights organization, the Supreme Court ordered the army and the prison administration to explain why the transfers of Palestinian detainees from one place of detention to another were often not recorded. The case remained pending at the end of the year.

Denial of family visits
Israeli authorities frequently denied visiting permits to relatives of Palestinian detainees on unspecified “security” grounds. The prohibition often appeared arbitrary, with the same relatives being allowed to visit on some occasions but not others. Many parents, spouses and children of detainees had not been allowed visits by their relatives for more than four years. In June, the Israeli authorities suspended all family visits for some 900 detainees from the Gaza Strip. The suspension remained in place for the rest of the year. No Israelis serving prison sentences were subjected to such restrictions.

Unfair trials before military courts
Trials of Palestinians before Israeli military courts often did not meet international standards of fairness, and no credible investigations were carried out into allegations of torture and other ill-treatment of detainees.

Prisoner releases
In July, October and December the Israeli authorities released some 770 Palestinian prisoners, mostly members of PA President Mahmoud Abbas’ Fatah party. In a deal concluded with Hizbullah in Lebanon in October, the Israeli authorities released a Lebanese man suffering from mental illness who had been captured by Israeli forces in Lebanon and removed to Israel in August 2006, and returned the bodies of two Lebanese Hizbullah fighters in exchange for the body of an Israeli who had drowned and had been washed up on the Lebanese coast years earlier. The Israeli authorities continued to refuse to return to their families the bodies of hundreds of Palestinians killed in attacks and confrontations with Israeli forces in previous years.

Impunity for attacks on Palestinians
Israeli soldiers and other members of the security forces as well as Israeli settlers continued to enjoy impunity for human rights abuses committed against Palestinians, including unlawful killings, torture and other ill-treatment, physical assaults and attacks on their property.

Investigations and prosecutions relating to such abuses were rare and usually limited to cases publicized by human rights organizations and the media. Few investigations were known to have been initiated into such abuses and most were closed for “lack of evidence”. In rare cases where soldiers or settlers were convicted of abusing Palestinians they received relatively lenient treatment, while no members of the General Security Service (GSS) were known to have been prosecuted for torturing Palestinians.

Torture and other ill-treatment
Detainees were often held in prolonged incommunicado detention under interrogation and denied access to their lawyers for up to several weeks. There were frequent reports of torture and other ill-treatment during this period. Methods reported included beating, tying in painful positions for prolonged periods, denial of access to toilets and threats to harm the detainees’ relatives. In some cases, detainees’ parents, wives or siblings were summoned and forced to appear before detainees while dressed in prison uniform to make the detainees believe that they too were being held and ill-treated.

In October, following a petition from a human rights organization, the Supreme Court issued an interim decision ordering the authorities to notify Palestinians held in a detention centre in the West Bank that new regulations allowed them free access to toilets. In March, following a petition from a human rights organization, the Supreme Court ordered the GSS to inform Mohammed Sweiti, a detainee who had been held incommunicado for five weeks, that his wife was not being detained. Mohammed Sweiti had begun a hunger strike and attempted suicide after he was shown his wife and his father dressed in prison uniform and was led to believe that they were being ill-treated.

Blockades and other restrictions
More than 550 Israeli military checkpoints and blockades restricted or prevented the movement of Palestinians between towns and villages in the West Bank. The Israeli authorities continued to expand illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank and to build a 700-km fence/wall, 80 per cent of which runs inside the West Bank. For this purpose, large areas of Palestinian land were seized or rendered inaccessible to Palestinians, depriving them of their source of livelihood and restricting their access to their workplaces, education and health facilities and other necessary services. Palestinians were barred from or had restricted access to more than 300km of roads in the West Bank, which were mostly used by Israeli settlers.

In June the Israeli authorities further strengthened the blockade previously imposed on the Gaza Strip to an unprecedented level. They closed the border with Egypt, the only point of entry/exit for Gaza’s inhabitants, and the Karni merchandise crossing. Thousands of Palestinians were left stranded on the Egyptian side of the border for months. Most were allowed to return to Gaza in August but scores remained stranded at the end of the year and thousands of students and workers could not leave Gaza to return to their studies and jobs abroad. Except in some urgent cases, even patients in need of medical care not available in Gaza were prevented from leaving the area and more than 40 died as a result.

The blockade caused a sharp deterioration in the already dire humanitarian situation in Gaza. The few factories that had continued to function despite restrictions imposed in previous years were forced to close because they could not import raw materials or export finished products. Vast amounts of flowers and other agricultural produce were wasted because they could not be exported. There were shortages of meat, dairy products and other basic foodstuffs, and of most other goods, including paper, pencils, clothes, spare parts for hospital equipment and medicine. Extreme poverty, malnutrition and other health problems increased. Eighty per cent of the population was forced to rely on international assistance, but UN aid agencies and humanitarian organizations were also negatively affected by restrictions and the increased operational costs these caused.

Destruction of homes
Israeli forces demolished more than 100 Palestinian homes throughout the West Bank, including in East Jerusalem, because of lack of building permits – which were systematically denied to Palestinian residents of these areas of the OPT. The demolitions left hundreds of Palestinians homeless.
  • In August, Israeli forces destroyed several homes and animal pens in Humsa, a small village in the Jordan Valley area of the West Bank. The families of Abdallah Hsein Bisharat and Ahmad Abdallah Bani Odeh, totalling some 40 people, most of them children, were made homeless. The army also confiscated the villagers’ water tanks and tractor. The villagers had been forced to move from nearby Hadidiya to Humsa after the Israeli army threatened to destroy their homes. The army considers the site a “closed military area” to be used by Israeli forces for shooting practice. In October, the families were again forced to move from Humsa and returned to Hadidiya.
  • In October, more than 200 Palestinians were forced from their homes in Khirbet Qassa, a small village established in the 1950s by Palestinian refugees. The village had been separated from the rest of the West Bank by the fence/wall and for more than a year Israeli forces had harassed the villagers to induce them to move. Their homes were mostly demolished on the grounds that they had been built without licences, which the Israeli authorities refuse to Palestinians in those areas.
Family reunification denied
Foreign nationals, mostly of Palestinian origin married to Palestinian inhabitants of the OPT, were increasingly denied entry to the OPT. Spouses with European and North American nationalities who had previously been able to reside in the OPT by leaving and re-entering Israel every three months in order to renew their visas, were often denied entry to the OPT. After a sustained campaign by those concerned and by human rights organizations, in October the Israeli authorities approved some 3,500 requests for family unification submitted in previous years. However, some 120,000 other outstanding cases were not addressed.
Amnesty International visits/reports
http://thereport.amnesty.org/eng/re...rael-and-the-occupied-palestinian-territories
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Is being a crimminal a prerequisite to becoming an Israeli leader or do they become crimminals after attaining power?
Can you name a country without corrupt politicians? I can't think of any off hand.

Doesn't anyone else find AI report above disturbing? The Occupied Palestinian Territories is a human rights catastrophe. Some people here blame Palestinians for their problems. To a certain degree that's tru, but its not as big a factor as portrayed by pro-Israel propaganda. The original cause of their problems was a huge injustice. Jewish refugees fleeing Nazi Europe fled to Palestine during the 1930's and 40's. Zionists ethnically cleansed Palestine of most non-Jews. Since the 1948 war, these people have lost their rights and their property in successive waves of ethnic cleansing and rolling annexations. Israel's border remain fluid and expanding. The original people and their descendants are continuously squeezed into what has now become a series of concentration camps.

Israel and the OPT is an international disgrace. No group of people should should have to suffer decades injustice and oppression. This area will be a root cause of violence in the region until millions of Palestinians have fundamental human rights, freedom and justice.

Those of you who believe that Palestinian violence rather than Israeli violence is the cause of Palestinian suffering, should consider that these people have no rights or freedoms. How many years should people wait as what used to be their land is continually annexed and occupied by Jewish only colonies?

Its been over 60 years. Is that long enough to wait before fighting for fundamental human rights and justice?

Could those of you who support what Israel does to these people please answer this question:

How long should people wait before they should fight for freedom and justice?
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
JTF,

you are ignoring a few important "facts".

1) Palestinians were never consulted before the UN partition plan was announced.

2) Zionists attacked Palestinians first without provocation.

3) Palestinians were mostly unarmed civilians and were not belligerents during the 1948 war.

4) Ongoing Zionist atrocities against innocent civilians caused Arab intervention. Israel declaring independance was just the final straw.


Jewish Israeli Historian Ilan Pappe
...Ethnic cleansing began in early December, 1947 when Palestinians comprised two-thirds of the population and Jews, mostly from war-torn Europe, the other third. The British tried dealing with two distinct ethnic entities choosing partition as the way to do it. By 1937, this solution became the centerpiece of Zionist policy, but it proved too hard for the Brits to resolve and be able to satisfy both sides. It instead handed the problem to the newly formed UN to deal with before their Mandate ended.

It put the Palestinians' fate in the hands of a Special Committee for Palestine (UNSCOP) whose members had no prior experience solving conflicts and knew little Palestinian history. It was a recipe for disaster as events unfolded. UNSCOP opted for partition favoring the Jews as compensation for the Nazi holocaust that became General Assembly Resolution 181 on November 29, 1947 giving them a state encompassing 56% the country with one-third of the population while making Jerusalem an international city. Palestinians were justifiably outraged. They were excluded from the decision-making process concluded against their will and at their expense.

From that moment on, the die was cast leading to partition, ethnic cleansing, the first Arab-Israeli war, the others to follow, and decades of disregard for their rights to this day creating their desperate state with no resolution in prospect. Resolution 181 was even worse than an unfair 56 - 44% division of territory as it allotted the most fertile land and almost all urban and rural territory in Palestine to the new Jewish state plus 400 of the over 1000 Palestinian villages their residents lost with no right of appeal.

Pappe explains Ben-Gurion simultaneously accepted and rejected the resolution. He and other Zionist leaders wanted official international recognition of the right of Jews to have their own state in Palestine. He was also determined to make Jerusalem the Jewish capital, intended final borders to remain flexible wanting to include within them as much future territory as possible, and today Israel is the only country in the world without established borders. Ben-Gurion decided borders would "be determined by force and not by partition resolution." He headed the Consultancy or Consultant Committee, an ad-hoc cabal of Zionist leaders created solely to plan the expulsion of Palestinians to cleanse the land for Jewish habitation only.

The process began in early December, 1947 with a series of attacks against Palestinian villages and neighborhoods. They were engaged ineffectively from the start on January 9 by units of the first all-Arab volunteer army. It resulted in forced expulsions beginning in mid-February, 1948. On March 10, final Plan Dalet was adopted with its first targets being Palestinian urban centers that were all occupied by end of April with about 250,000 Palestinians uprooted, displaced or killed including by massacres, the most notorious and remembered being at Deir Yassin even though Tantura may have been the largest.

Deir Yassin was Palestinian land on April 9 when Jewish soldiers burst into the village, machine-gunned houses randomly killing many in them. The remaining villagers were then assembled in one place and murdered in cold blood including children and women first raped and then killed. Recent research puts the number massacred at 93 (including 30 babies), but dozens more were killed in the fighting that ensued making the total number of deaths much higher.

The Arab League finally decided on April 30 to intervene militarily but only after the British Mandate ended on May 15, 1948, the day the Jewish Agency declared the establishment of the state of Israel in Palestine. The US and Soviet Union officially recognized the new state legitimizing it, and on the same day Arab forces entered the territory...

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=LEN20070207&articleId=4715

Palestinians have not had freedom and justice since 1947. They never had a say in the 1947 UN partition plan. They were attacked, raped and murdered for five months before Israel declared independance.

Look at a recent map.





All of Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories are controlled by Zionists. Most of the West Bank is off limits to Palestinians. Gaza is an open air prison.

Who was not satisfied with less than everything again?

The facts are Zionists invaded, occupied, conquered and ethnically cleansed most of Palestine. Palestinians never asked for an invasion of European Jewish refugees. They never asked to be ethnically cleansed or forcefully relocated into concentration camps. They are victims and the world has ignored their suffering for 60 years.

How long should Palestinians wait for freedom and justice before fighting back is justified? Is 60 years long enough?
 
Last edited:

Just the Facts

House Member
Oct 15, 2004
4,162
43
48
SW Ontario
JTF,

you are ignoring a few important "facts".

1) Palestinians were never consulted before the UN partition plan was announced.

2) Zionists attacked Palestinians first without provocation.

3) Palestinians were mostly unarmed civilians and were not belligerents during the 1948 war.

4) Ongoing Zionist atrocities against innocent civilians caused Arab intervention. Israel declaring independance was just the final straw.

That's nonsense. Zionists and Arabs were both guilty of atrocities against each other on an ongoing basis for decades before 1948. It's not possible for anyone to say "who started it".

What's more, you've acknowledged the above in our past discussions. Then you come back and post the same propaganda again. That's exactly the kind of tactic that makes it very difficult for me to take the Palestinian cause seriously.

In any case, even if we were to accept your four points above as gospel truth, it changes nothing. If the Palestinians had accepted the partition plan, there would be no refugees, no suffering in the "occupied" territories (I prefer "disputed" territories) and there would be no need to hold out for right of return because no one would have left in the first place.

And guess what, your "4 million" refugees would have been 4 million Israeli citizens. Who would win an election with those numbers? Do the math. Palestinians would have been able to VOTE Israel out of existance TODAY if it had not been for their belligerance.

Eat them apples.
 

Just the Facts

House Member
Oct 15, 2004
4,162
43
48
SW Ontario
The facts are Zionists invaded, occupied, conquered and ethnically cleansed most of Palestine.

You're confusing "facts" with "lies".

They never asked to be ethnically cleansed or forcefully relocated into concentration camps.

Interesting:

The Arabs who became refugees in 1948 were not expelled by Israel but left on their own to facilitate the destruction of Israel, according to a senior Palestinian journalist writing in a Palestinian daily.

Edit to add (for people who can't be bothered to read links)

Conclusion
It is clear from these statements that there is general acknowledgement among Palestinians that Arab leaders bear responsibility for the mass flight of Arabs from Israel in 1948, and were the cause of the "refugee" problem. Furthermore, the fact that this information has been validated by public figures and refugees in the Palestinian Authority media itself confirms that this responsibility is well-known - even though for propaganda purposes its leaders continue to blame Israel publicly for "the expulsion."

http://www.pmw.org.il/Bulletins_may2008.html#b200508

They are victims and the world has ignored their suffering for 60 years.

I think you'd be hard pressed to find anyone's suffering less ignored.
 
Last edited:

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
You're confusing "facts" with "lies".


Conclusion
It is clear from these statements that there is general acknowledgement among Palestinians that Arab leaders bear responsibility for the mass flight of Arabs from Israel in 1948, and were the cause of the "refugee" problem. Furthermore, the fact that this information has been validated by public figures and refugees in the Palestinian Authority media itself confirms that this responsibility is well-known - even though for propaganda purposes its leaders continue to blame Israel publicly for "the expulsion."

http://www.pmw.org.il/Bulletins_may2008.html#b200508

You get your opinions from this website? http://www.pmw.org.il/

No wonder your opinions are so distorted. Check my source in comparison. Its far more qualified than yours:

Professor Ilan Pappe

History Department, University of Exeter (Cornwall Campus)
E-mail: i.pappe@exeter.ac.uk


I was born in Haifa (Israel) in 1954. I received my D. Phil in Politics from Oxford University in 1984. Between 1984 and 2007 I was a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Political Science in Haifa University.

My research fields are the following: History of the Palestine Question; Middle Eastern History; Nationalism; Multiculturalism and Ethnic Studies; Theories of Historiographies; Power and Knowledge and Cultural Studies.

http://www.centres.ex.ac.uk/exceps/staff/pappe/

Yes atrocities were committed by each side in an escalating tit-for-tat that started soon after zionist Jewish refugees arrived enmasse to take possession of a land without people for a people without land. Zionists definitely started the ethnic cleansing. Israel's own records as documented by Israeli historians like Pappe, Benny Morris and others clearly show early zionists started preparing for their ethnic cleansing campaign in the 1930's and then executed their plans as soon as they had the upper hand.

The claim that statements by Arab leaders caused the mass exodus of Arabs defies common sense and is not supported by the evidence. The truth is that most Arab leaders urged the Palestinian population to stay at home, but fear of violent death at the hands of the Zionist forces led most of them to flee. This is not to deny that some Arab commanders did instruct Palestinian civilians to evacuate their homes during the fighting, either to make sure that they did not get caught in a firefight or to ensure that they were not killed by the Zionist forces engaged in ethnically cleansing Palestinians.

...Palestinian expulsion erased

Pappe noted that Israeli textbooks, media outlets and politicians have totally erased this narrative and replaced it with a new story that says the Jewish state welcomed Palestinians in Palestine. But it was outside Arab leaders who called on the local population to leave, and the Jews pleaded with them to stay.

"In fact," said Pappe, "this story is a mythology. This Israeli side of the story was presented as being professional and objective, while the Palestinian narrative was seen as being pure propaganda."

It was not until the late 1980s, with the work of Pappe and Israeli historian Benny Morris, that people began to hear a different story, which, in fact, was being told by Palestinians ever since 1948.

"But the Palestinian version of events, due to the powerful, worldwide Zionist propaganda, did not win credibility," stated Pappe...

http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-110916427.html

I can also find many other Israeli historians which back up Pappe's claims about the causes of the Arab exodus.
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
Invasion of European Jews?

Nice myth, but there were plenty of Jews already there. Residents who never asked for a wave of Arabs to come streaming in from the other Ottoman territories (before anyone says ancient history this is still *barely* in living memory).

In the end, who disrupted the population balance of who doesn't matter.

Israel is there, its citizens were born there and most of the "palestinians wanting to return home" were not.

You don't get to choose who your ancestors were, and you are not responsible for their crimes, nor entitled to their benefits.

Palestine is firing on Israel, regardless of who started it, that makes it a warzone. If Palestine doesn't want to be a warzone (and its the one who is suffering from it more) it should stop shooting.

As for Pappe, he has an odd bend of refusing to acknowledge all the truth, ie, the Arab newspaper headlines that tell people point blank, get the hell out - staying helps the jews.

He reminds me alot of Sam P. Langley, he has an Idea, he wants to be right, and regardless of what it takes he'll try to make people think he is.
 

Just the Facts

House Member
Oct 15, 2004
4,162
43
48
SW Ontario
You get your opinions from this website? http://www.pmw.org.il/

No wonder your opinions are so distorted. Check my source in comparison. Its far more qualified than yours:

Nice try, but those are the opinions of Palestinian Arabs, not "a website".

Yes atrocities were committed by each side in an escalating tit-for-tat that started soon after zionist Jewish refugees arrived enmasse to take possession of a land without people for a people without land.

They arrived en masse with money to buy land from landlords. They developed the land creating an economy which spurned Arabs to begin arriving en masse to take jobs.

Don't try to create the impression that zionists arrived with guns and swords and started throwing Arabs out of their homes. The zionist plot was to BUY the land.


Zionists definitely started the ethnic cleansing. Israel's own records as documented by Israeli historians like Pappe, Benny Morris and others clearly show early zionists started preparing for their ethnic cleansing campaign in the 1930's and then executed their plans as soon as they had the upper hand.

Their hand is as upper as it's ever been. Still, we have over a million Arabs in Israel. We have no Jews in Jordan, no Jews in Gaza, Jews in the west bank being subject to eviction as a fundamental clause to any peace negotiations, and an insignificant percentage of Jews who lived in the rest of the Arab world remain.

Still, you insist upon your claims of ethnic cleansing? Your argument makes as much sense as that Iraqi guy claiming there are no Americans in Baghdad while standing in front of the tanks. Give it up.
 

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Nice try, but those are the opinions of Palestinian Arabs, not "a website".

re:
http://www.pmw.org.il/

They didn't even bother to hide it with a .com or .net .

.il means it originates in Israel. Read the "about"

Itamar Marcus is director of Palestinian Media Watch.

Mr. Marcus was also the Director of Research for the Center for Monitoring the Impact of Peace from 1998 - 2000, writing studies on Palestinian, Jordanian, and Syrian school textbooks.

Mr. Marcus was a member of the Israeli delegation to the Tri-lateral [American, Israeli and Palestinian] Committee to Monitor Incitement, established under the Wye Accords.

Palestinian Media Watch prepared the material for the Israeli delegation that was submitted at these negotiations


Everything posted at that website is probably accurate... more or less. But Mr. Marcus of Israel's purpose isn't to inform objectively or tell the whole truth. The technique is called selective truth propaganda and it's effective on people who can't recognize it for what it is. But I'm not naming names JTF.

I can quote many other Jewish Israeli historians which have gone through the Israeli/British archives of declassified docs. They also interviewed eye witnesses from all sides. Then they wrote books about their conclusions regarding the evidence. You should read some.

They arrived en masse with money to buy land from landlords. They developed the land creating an economy which spurned Arabs to begin arriving en masse to take jobs.

Another misperception. Sure there was an element of that. The maps I posted above show how much was bought by Zionists. But they didn't buy all of Israel or even come close to buying all the property granted to them by the UN partition.

That's also on the maps above.

If Zionists would have stuck to creating Israel non-violently (except to defend themselves) based on land owned by Jews or anyone else wanted to join them, I don't think we'd have today's problems.

But the evidence is overwhelming that each day, more of the holylands are conquered by force. Its been a daily occurence for more than 60 years. The people on the recieving end grow more numerous, become better armed and trained, and are more angry. The longterm consequences of that trend are not good for anyone including the majority of Israelis.

Don't try to create the impression that zionists arrived with guns and swords and started throwing Arabs out of their homes. The zionist plot was to BUY the land.

Their hand is as upper as it's ever been. Still, we have over a million Arabs in Israel. We have no Jews in Jordan, no Jews in Gaza, Jews in the west bank being subject to eviction as a fundamental clause to any peace negotiations, and an insignificant percentage of Jews who lived in the rest of the Arab world remain....

Some non-Jewish Arabs and their descendants have avoided ethnic cleansing... so far.

76 percent of Israeli Jews give some degree of support to transferring Israeli Arabs to a future Palestinian state:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull&cid=1206632376762

But Israeli Arabs aren't what we are talking about. The problem is the 600,000-800,000 people who were ethnically cleansed from what is today Israel and their descendents who remain nationless refugees since Israel's creation. We are also probably talking about hundreds/thousands of Jews who fled as refugees from Arab areas during the conflict and later on. We are talking about people treated unjustly.

But let's assume for a moment JTF is right and these people were not terrorized out of their homes. Lets assume they left based on their free will. Consider the logic behind that conclusion in order to answer these questions:

Is that a good reason to confiscate their homes, farms, and business? Is that a good reason to block their return to their homes? Is that a good reason to nullify their citizenship in the country they were born?

If the answer to those questions aren't clear then consider the exact same question another way. The Zionist movement also encouraged Jews from Europe and elsewhere to emigrate to Israel. Is that a good reason to confiscate their homes, farms, and business in their respective countries? Is that a good reason to block their return to their homes if they choose to do so? Is that a good reason to nullify their citizenship in the countries they were born?

The just and fair answer to all of these questions is no. Nobody has the right to usurp the political and civil rights of another citizen PERIOD, regardless of the circumstances.

But let's be honest here. Its obvious even to Israel's defenders that most Palestinians were terrorized out of their homes, farms, and businesses. Their lame explanations defy common sense. People don't willingly abandon their homes, properties and business. They don't willingly agree to foreigners building condos, shopping malls and airports over their razed villages and cemetaries. Most who fled believed that if they stayed, this is what they could expect:

Interview with Benny Morris
Benny Morris is a Professor of History at Ben-Gurion University in Beersheeba, Israel.

Interview:

...According to your new findings, how many cases of Israeli rape were there in 1948?

"About a dozen... ...incident decriptions... neither the victims nor the rapists liked to report these events, we have to assume that the dozen cases of rape that were reported, which I found, are not the whole story. They are just the tip of the iceberg."

According to your findings, how many acts of Israeli massacre were perpetrated in 1948?

"Twenty-four. In some cases four or five people were executed, in others the numbers were 70, 80, 100. There was also a great deal of arbitrary killing... ...incident decriptions... ..."That can't be chance. It's a pattern. Apparently, various officers who took part in the operation understood that the expulsion order they received permitted them to do these deeds in order to encourage the population to take to the roads. The fact is that no one was punished for these acts of murder. Ben-Gurion silenced the matter. He covered up for the officers who did the massacres."

What you are telling me here, as though by the way, is that in Operation Hiram there was a comprehensive and explicit expulsion order. Is that right?

"Yes. One of the revelations in the book is that on October 31, 1948, the commander of the Northern Front, Moshe Carmel, issued an order in writing to his units to expedite the removal of the Arab population....

..."There is no justification for acts of rape. There is no justification for acts of massacre. Those are war crimes. But in certain conditions, expulsion is not a war crime. I don't think that the expulsions of 1948 were war crimes. You can't make an omelet without breaking eggs. You have to dirty your hands."

We are talking about the killing of thousands of people, the destruction of an entire society.

"A society that aims to kill you forces you to destroy it. When the choice is between destroying or being destroyed, it's better to destroy."

There is something chilling about the quiet way in which you say that.

"If you expected me to burst into tears, I'm sorry to disappoint you. I will not do that."...

http://www.counterpunch.org/shavit01162004.html




Now that makes sense. I can understand why people would flee. I expect the experiences by many who stayed behind and survived also wasn't pleasant. Many Israeli Arabs somehow managed to remain in Israel. Some managed to keep their property, but many others became internally displaced persons within Israel and still have not been properly compensated for lossing their homes to European refugees and their descendants. I also expect some Israeli Arabs were hidden by their Jewish neighbors just like Anne Frank's experience. I even read a story during my research about a Jewish Israeli officer who defied orders to expulse every non-Jew in his home town. The people he saved and their descendants are still there and are grateful. I wish I could find that story again.

War isn't black and white. Atrocities and acts of compassion were committed by all sides.

Benny Morris (interview above) is unflinchingly honest about events even though he is a defender of Zionism. Since Benny Morris, many other Jewish Israeli historians have uncovered additional evidence supporting Benny Morris's description of deliberate atrocities in order to carry out a premeditated ethnic cleansing campaign.

This isn't about bringing those who committed these crimes so many decades ago to justice. Most are dead anyway. I raise these points so that people understand how Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories got to the current situation. The solution is what Benny Morris did above. Unflinchingly tell the truth as supported objectively by the evidence.

The current propaganda helps maintain the status quo which unltimately is unmaintainable. In the longrun, Israel must change and these people must have freedom and justice. The alternative is a war where all sides eventually anihilate each other.
 
Last edited:

Just the Facts

House Member
Oct 15, 2004
4,162
43
48
SW Ontario
The just and fair answer to all of these questions is no. Nobody has the right to usurp the political and civil rights of another citizen PERIOD, regardless of the circumstances.

If there was the slightest murmur of hope that these people could live together in peace and dignity with repect for each others rights, then I would agree with you wholeheartedly.

Unfortunately, the Arabs chose war, and you know as well as I do, as do the Palestinians by their own admission, that allowing these refugees and their offspring back would be the death of every Jew in Israel.

That's just the sad reality of it.