If you were the Governor General, what would you do?

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
As they and the PQ have said before, they're waiting for the "right conditions". The party is a federal conflict of interest. I'm personally tired of the eastern political greed that has historically been set upon this country. This is a power grab to re-centralize to the tradional few small eastern pockets.

Oh I can take a hint. I'm not in Quebec But I am a part of the Eastern "Pockets" and kinda find that almost offensive in regards to blaming it all on "Our Greed"

Our Greed?

You gotta have money first before you can become greedy.

Where did everybody go from here in the last few of years?

Out west to work on the oil sands "because that's where the money and jobs are."

^ A very common explination from those who leave here.

If any of us are greedy, it's because we got a damn good reason to be.

Oh but it's all our fault that Harper and his party have been shoving all the money and support out west and it's our fault that the west is getting special treatment because the government can make an easy buck on the side?

It's our fault that Harper and the Conservatives decided to break the original agreements on Newfoundland and Nova Scotia's pipeline projects and give us less?

When we were finally getting to a point where we could get somewhere near what the West gets and no longer have to complain to the government for money and jobs..... that jackass went and changed the plans.

It was to the point where two of his own, the two premieres of these provinces, had to head out to Ottawa and protest (albeit a lame one from the NS premiere)

The west know more of a hell lot more about greed then what the East does, that's for sure.

I mentioned money heading to the Oil Sands, but I never went so far as to say everybody out in the west was selfish and greedy until now.

That was a low blow with very little connection.

Like the Bloc is to Quebecers, I suppose this will mean that Conservatives are the only party for westerners. Today I ran into a guy who has always voted NDP. We're in a traditionally high NDP supported community. If his opinion reflects how others might feel about this, the NDP days might be numbered. He intends to vote Conservative next time. I personally have never been loyal to anyone, but I will take the same approach as QC does with its affairs and loyally vote Conservative from now on. And if we hold our own referendum with the "right conditions" I might throw my support for it too.

Yeah sounds wonderful. Why don't we just split up the country right now and get it over with? There is already a very clear division in the country, and the Wests fearmongering over the East is of couse getting worse then ever before, in a very fearmongering and ignorant way.

What's the point? Seriously? How about the whole east just split off now, you guys can keep the Canada name, we'll figure out our own issues.... hell, maybe join the US and become States.

Now there's an idea.

There is no point when the Government doesn't trust itself, the people don't trust the government, and the people don't trust the people.

Zero Confidence

The country is no longer united except by beer commercials. Harper has pitted the West against the East to keep his greasy hands onto power when democratic action, which is 100% valid and right to do, is taken on him.

If he wants to keep his friggin power, then by all means, keep the damn position. It doesn't do anybody any good when he doesn't use that power the way it should be. We can just off the rest of the country to you guys, enjoy.

People have said in the past "Well Prax if it's that bad, leave."

Well maybe we will. Maybe Quebec will, now that you all made this into a division.

Not one single person talked about or even proposed Quebec would have an opportunity to seperate, and even they never said anything about Seperating.

Harper and every other person who listens to his beck and call finger pointed to seperation, and like everyone in the US against the word Terrorism, you all in the west friggin snapped off your rockers and started thinking this was about division and seperation.

And now it's getting to this point where now everybody isn't just finger pointing the politicians, now it's to the point where citizens of this nation are finger pointing one another.

Great job, this sure will solve everything now won't it?
 

scratch

Senate Member
May 20, 2008
5,658
22
38
Harpo & Co. are doing nasty things everywhere to there demise. We do not need to stir up the pequistes, again.

Just an observation

regards
scratch
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
JLM, I think Dion will be better in a minority situation than Harper. Dion is less combative, more prone to compromise, cooperation. He has to be, if he is going to survive governing the coalition. Even in the opposition, he has been emphasizing cooperation, team effort with Ignatieff, Rae etc.

And anyway, Dion will be gone in a few months. As to Bloc, my understanding is that the coalition has worked out an agenda. If they stick to the agenda and don’t try to improvise, they probably should be OK for year and a half.

Anyway, it is quite possible that by his trashing of Québec, Harper may have done permanent harm to federalism, he may have promoted Québec separatism big time. I understand PQ is gaining in the polls for the last few days, since Harper started his campaign against Quebec.

Do you really think that if Dion becomes P.M. he will really step down as leader or the powers that be in the Liberal party will be in favour of anything that will "rock the boat". Perhaps Dion will be less combative but I don't think he's necessarily shown his true colours yet- unless it was during his incoherent tirade on Global news two days ago.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
I don't understand all this talk of changing party loyalties over this mess. Whatever on earth for? I can honestly not see where one party or one leader has conducted themselves with any more or less integrity towards the citizens of Canada throughout this.

I imagine they're not looking all that great to the public's eye, but considering the situation at hand, if it was going to be an easy solution, this wouldn't be such an issue.

I do think Harper started this round of hostilities with a pretty blatant shot that still shocks me with it's audacity. BUT, I don't like what the 3 opposition leaders are up to either. No doubt Harper needed to be tuned in - stopped even - but the motivations at play here from the Coalition are the wrong ones.

Well if there was another option available, I imagine it would have been taken. But almost all the time in the past, the leading party and PM is supposed to work with the rest of the government, esspecially in a minority, and when they don't work with the rest of them and make it into some kind of game for his own personal agendas, something needs to be done, and to me, this is the most logical course of action.

They're fighting AGAINST Harper, not FOR Canada - and Harper, well, he's just fighting for Harper as far as I can see.

Which is exactly the point.

Everyday that the government is actually supposed to work, Harper picks a fight with the other parties, and the other parties have to fight back. Then he calls an election for another fight. He didn't get exactly what he himself wanted, so he picks another fight as soon as the school bells rang.

If it's always going to be about harper, then remove him and get on with the work.

In attempting to blindside the democratic process by pulling the financial rug out from under the very opposition that ensures democracy is served, Harper also tried to yank that rug right out from every single Canadian - adding insult to injury by not even trying to be clever in his attempt to disguise whose agenda he was serving.

100% agree.

His plan to cut their funding was tantamount to handing the other parties an early Christmas present with a card saying "here ya go boyz... the instrument of my demise... use it well" And oh ya...those boyz did just that: the mileage they've wrung out of that bullying blunder, which in turn is providing all kinds of yummy fodder for Harper to spin and spew more BS at us ... yep, the vengeance is thick now... thick and slimy and some really bad kinda nasty.

And with this situation that Harper has created, it's just going to get a whole lot more messier and nastier.

Yes, the other parties are going to get a lot of crap flung their way for what they are doing, but if it was me, I'd rather tarnish my name in the press to do the right thing, then to sit by quietly and allow Harper to keep getting away with his corrupt ways.

He is the true distruction of democracy and the fact that all the other parties are joining together and uniting (Including the Bloc) that should have united the country, which Harper has failed to do year after year.

Instead, Harper attacks the weak chain and go for the seperatist and socialist attacks.

Half of what the government does and is is socialist in the first place, such as Universal health care... what's the problem?

And if the Bloc really wanted to seperate and all that, they wouldn't need to join in with the Coalition, they'd just let Harper do what he wants and destroy our democracy. They'd have no problem then.

All of the parties joined together because they all oppose Harper and his selfish arrogance. This Coalition is being created for the interests of Canada.

It's not all about attacking Harper and that's it..... if they win, and the Coalition takes place, Harper is history.... what then?

Get to Work, that's what. And Finally I might add. Sounds like a good idea.

And if the Coalition goes to crap, then we have an election again..... people are making too much of a big deal out of this, all because Harper is making a big deal out of this.

And I might hold a bit of credibility for Harper if he simply would stop lying to the public.

If he lies, there is no trust, there is no confidence..... and he flat out lied in his public address last night on a number of occasions.

That as Prime Minister is wrong, and for his own attempt to disable our Democracy and our Country by pitting us all against one another, he should be tried for Treason.

The whole lot of them piss me off. I suspect, and I hope that what I'm reading over the last few days from normally rational people as they react and respond is due in large part to also being right choked at what this band of buffoons is trying to pull off here.

And I agree on all of that as well.... they all suck, but Harper is the worst one of the bunch, he can not be trusted and he needs to be removed before he screws everything up. (And it would seem he's very close)

I think we're so flabberghasted by this unholy mess we're standing here with our jaws agape - dumbfounded with disbelief and PISSED OFF. We've only JUST came out of 6 weeks of fugly campaigning tactics (including that insufferable blue sweater gakkk!) .... only to be bitch slapped with THIS now?

Once again, 100% agree.... nobody wants to go through another election so soon after the last.... that's just a joke. And Harper knows that if he got another election now, he wouldn't need his budget to be passed that would cripple the other parties, they'd already be crippled by back to back elections.

And that's how he plans on killing our democracy.

A - He Kills it by calling another election so soon and 90% of the options for Canadians die off.

B - He Kills it by passing the budget and hince 90% of the options for Canadians die off.

or

C - He fights this coalition to the bitter end, pitting the nation against itself, destroying the country and whatever unity was left. Then there is no more Democracy.... there is no more Canada.

If he keeps pushing that Bloc Quebec button and making fellow Canadian Citizens living in Quebec seem like the enemies and thus, spreading to the rest of the east.... they will seperate.... and so would the Maritimes shortly afterwards.... either by choice or by necessity.

If Harper can not hang onto his Power, he will try everything in his power that he has to take the rest of the country down with him.

We need to figure out how we can force the parties to produce some leadership, accountability, and some policies we can get behind rather than succumbing to this helpless 'over a barrel' feeling of having to try and figure out which evil is the lesser - 'cause none of 'em are lesser! So don't bother switching teams just yet - the uniforms may be different but the play book sure isn't.

And the funny thing is that the playbook hasn't even arrived yet and people are complaining about it. And the greater majority of those I see opposed, including elsewhere other then these forums, they are ignorant to how the procress actually works.

Too bad we don't have a "Loss of Confidence in the Whole Damn Parliament" clause in our constitution, cause now would be a good time to purge the freaks and start over.

Once again, I agree.

There's always Revolution if you want to keep the country intact.

Or if you're just concerned about your own area of the map, seperate.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Do you really think that if Dion becomes P.M. he will really step down as leader or the powers that be in the Liberal party will be in favour of anything that will "rock the boat". Perhaps Dion will be less combative but I don't think he's necessarily shown his true colours yet- unless it was during his incoherent tirade on Global news two days ago.

Dion will step down, there is no question about this. Until the Liberals get a new leader, he can just sit there and the others tell him what needs to be done and he can do it for a little while.... it's either that or have Harper continue with this joke of a political process with nothing getting done.

Hell a school kid can do this job better
 

scratch

Senate Member
May 20, 2008
5,658
22
38
Unfortunately for US (Canadians) this situation has to come to a quick resolution. If not IMO we will be lost.


regards
scratch
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
Dion will step down, there is no question about this. Until the Liberals get a new leader, he can just sit there and the others tell him what needs to be done and he can do it for a little while.... it's either that or have Harper continue with this joke of a political process with nothing getting done.

Hell a school kid can do this job better

Oh baloney!

Harper provided reasonably good leadership, at least in the opinion of the electorate....as proven by his increase in seats in the last election.

The people did not elect Dion, in fact, they soundly rejected him.

The people did not vote with any knowledge of the possiblity that they would be voting the BQ into power federally. Not even the Quebecois knew that......and the rest of us had no chance to vote for, or against them.

The people certainly did not vote for the platform of the Coalition, not even close. As i remember, in the election deficit was an issue, with every party trying to outdo the other in claiming how they would never run a deficit, and also that the parties all would run one......yet the coalition plans to put us tensof billions of dollars into deficit.....the lion's share spent (mark my words) to pay off the BQ. That has already been shown, with the promise of massive aid to forestry demanded by the BQ........ridiculous, as a prosperous forestry industry depends on a booming US housing market with a non-protectionist US administration.....neither of which we have.

Geezus, the BQ will use all that unsaleable lumber we buy for them to build a nice high fence around the province.

I become increasingly convinced what we need is a new election.

Even if the same numbers are returned, then Canadians will have walked into this fiasco willingly. As it is, they were led to the slaughter blind-folded.
 

scratch

Senate Member
May 20, 2008
5,658
22
38
My Dear Colpy,

With all due respect to you....

If the Bloc was able to get into Federal politics why didn't someone start `an Ontario Bloc` to offset them?

It is beyond my comprehension that it wasn't done.

Now all of this, and I beg to differ, is the Bloc's fault? I think not.

The Bloc had foresight to protect themselves and no-one else did.

Now, in your opinion they are a force to be reckoned with.

They are a legal Federal party, regardless of what they do or do not.

Just a personal observation and opinion.

regards,
scratch
 

Risus

Genius
May 24, 2006
5,373
25
38
Toronto
Oh baloney!

Harper provided reasonably good leadership, at least in the opinion of the electorate....as proven by his increase in seats in the last election.

The people did not elect Dion, in fact, they soundly rejected him.

The people did not vote with any knowledge of the possiblity that they would be voting the BQ into power federally. Not even the Quebecois knew that......and the rest of us had no chance to vote for, or against them.

The people certainly did not vote for the platform of the Coalition, not even close. As i remember, in the election deficit was an issue, with every party trying to outdo the other in claiming how they would never run a deficit, and also that the parties all would run one......yet the coalition plans to put us tensof billions of dollars into deficit.....the lion's share spent (mark my words) to pay off the BQ. That has already been shown, with the promise of massive aid to forestry demanded by the BQ........ridiculous, as a prosperous forestry industry depends on a booming US housing market with a non-protectionist US administration.....neither of which we have.

Geezus, the BQ will use all that unsaleable lumber we buy for them to build a nice high fence around the province.

I become increasingly convinced what we need is a new election.

Even if the same numbers are returned, then Canadians will have walked into this fiasco willingly. As it is, they were led to the slaughter blind-folded.

I agree. I think that a new election is needed, although the public doesn't want it, it was the three stooges that forced it...
 

s_lone

Council Member
Feb 16, 2005
2,233
30
48
44
Montreal
The people did not vote with any knowledge of the possiblity that they would be voting the BQ into power federally. Not even the Quebecois knew that......and the rest of us had no chance to vote for, or against them.

It's true, nobody in Quebec could have suspected what is going on right now. But the fact remains that the Bloc's support was again solid because it managed to focus the ANTI-CONSERVATIVE sentiment.

So those who voted for the Bloc are pretty satisfied with the situation right now. They don't feel like they've been had because Bloc voters were mostly voting to stop Harper from getting his majority. And they got even better than that!
 

Vanni Fucci

Senate Member
Dec 26, 2004
5,239
17
38
8th Circle, 7th Bolgia
the-brights.net
Oh baloney!

Harper provided reasonably good leadership, at least in the opinion of the electorate....as proven by his increase in seats in the last election.

The people did not elect Dion, in fact, they soundly rejected him.

The people did not vote with any knowledge of the possiblity that they would be voting the BQ into power federally. Not even the Quebecois knew that......and the rest of us had no chance to vote for, or against them.

The people certainly did not vote for the platform of the Coalition, not even close. As i remember, in the election deficit was an issue, with every party trying to outdo the other in claiming how they would never run a deficit, and also that the parties all would run one......yet the coalition plans to put us tensof billions of dollars into deficit.....the lion's share spent (mark my words) to pay off the BQ. That has already been shown, with the promise of massive aid to forestry demanded by the BQ........ridiculous, as a prosperous forestry industry depends on a booming US housing market with a non-protectionist US administration.....neither of which we have.

Geezus, the BQ will use all that unsaleable lumber we buy for them to build a nice high fence around the province.

I become increasingly convinced what we need is a new election.

Even if the same numbers are returned, then Canadians will have walked into this fiasco willingly. As it is, they were led to the slaughter blind-folded.

Let's say hypothetically that in 2004, Paul Martin's Liberal's had lost the confidence vote and Harper's BQ and NDP backed coalition was allowed by the Governor General to take power, would you have screamed as loudly for an election then, I wonder...

I guess we'll never know, and I don't know that you'll truthfully answer me now...
 

scratch

Senate Member
May 20, 2008
5,658
22
38
VF.

A very interesting question indeed.

Personal opinion/observation

rgs
scratch
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
My Dear Colpy,

With all due respect to you....

If the Bloc was able to get into Federal politics why didn't someone start `an Ontario Bloc` to offset them?

It is beyond my comprehension that it wasn't done.

Now all of this, and I beg to differ, is the Bloc's fault? I think not.

The Bloc had foresight to protect themselves and no-one else did.

Now, in your opinion they are a force to be reckoned with.

They are a legal Federal party, regardless of what they do or do not.

Just a personal observation and opinion.

regards,
scratch

No, absolutely NONe of this is the Bloc's fault.

they are simply doing what they were elected to do, screw over Canada to the benefit of Quebec.

I have much more respectfor Duceppe than I do for Dion, or Layton.

Duceppe is the ONLY one doing what he was elected to do........my problem is with those seditious morons Dion and Layton, who have sold their political souls to Duceppe.........
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
Let's say hypothetically that in 2004, Paul Martin's Liberal's had lost the confidence vote and Harper's BQ and NDP backed coalition was allowed by the Governor General to take power, would you have screamed as loudly for an election then, I wonder...

I guess we'll never know, and I don't know that you'll truthfully answer me now...

Oh Yes.

Oh so very yes.

A plague on those who consort with Separatists.

I have very little tolerance for appeasement, I don't give a damn about who the appeaser is.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Oh I can take a hint. I'm not in Quebec But I am a part of the Eastern "Pockets" and kinda find that almost offensive in regards to blaming it all on "Our Greed"

Our Greed?
I'm talking power greed. Out west we've never had political power, it has always been out east. E.G., one of few time PET came to visit he gave us the finger. The west has never been represented in numbers high enough to change government. This is something only the east can do.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Oh baloney!

Harper provided reasonably good leadership, at least in the opinion of the electorate....as proven by his increase in seats in the last election.

That isn't proof, if it was, he would have a majority by now, but he doesn't. He's not a good leader and just because some Canadians are afraid of any kind of change, doesn't make it so. And considering how dismal Dion's election was and how many seats they lost, Harper didn't gain much out of the last election and even still, the greater majority of Canadians did not vote for him, which means the greater majority of Canadians didn't think he did a good job as leader.

And he's clearly showing that he's still not a good leader.

The people did not elect Dion, in fact, they soundly rejected him.

And you're still going on the basis that Dion is actually going to stay as leader.... he's getting the boot in a couple of months anyways, so it doesn't matter.

Not to mention that he's not going to be left to his own devices, he's going to have everybody all over what he does until he does leave.

The people did not vote with any knowledge of the possiblity that they would be voting the BQ into power federally. Not even the Quebecois knew that......and the rest of us had no chance to vote for, or against them.

That doesn't really matter does it? None of us voted for them and our chance was already given to us by not giving a ballot to them in the first place. If you wouldn't vote for them anyways, and you'd keep the same decision you had back when you voted, then there's no logic in putting them on the ballot where you live.

But they also represent part of this nation.... They are Canadians regardless of what you think their intentions are, and they have every right to be a part of this government, like it always has been, to represent the interests of those who voted for them.

And don't forget, not everybody who voted for the Bloc want to seperate. They're usually selected because they have their best interests at play. If they had the poll to seperate again, so long as they feel they have a decent quality of life here in Canada, they will vote no..... But if Harper keeps playing the patriotic games he is playing, that option to seperate is going to become very real once again.... regardless if there is a coalition or not.

The people certainly did not vote for the platform of the Coalition, not even close.

That's because you vote for the best deals the parties can cut you and those were the options available at the time..... which would also explain the low voter turnout.

But it doesn't matter what voters voted for.... because the only thing you really vote for is the guy you want to represent your area of the country.... the rest is done outside of our hands.

And Canadians need to stop blinding themselves.... In every election that crates a minority government, the option of a Coalition is always real, because it is always a part of our democracy.

You can't go around defending our democracy when you complain and feel parts of it are wrong, simply because things arn't going the way you wanted.

I put up with it for long enough, now they shoe is on the other foot.

As i remember, in the election deficit was an issue, with every party trying to outdo the other in claiming how they would never run a deficit, and also that the parties all would run one......yet the coalition plans to put us tensof billions of dollars into deficit.....

The Conservatives already lied to us about the Deficit multiple times now. They said we would never hit one.... then they said we'd just scrape by but still not hit one.... now even they are saying they'd have to run a deficit......

So now both parties are stating that no matter what happens, a deficit is going to happen regardless..... so if one is going to happen, do what needs to be done.

the lion's share spent (mark my words) to pay off the BQ. That has already been shown, with the promise of massive aid to forestry demanded by the BQ........ridiculous, as a prosperous forestry industry depends on a booming US housing market with a non-protectionist US administration.....neither of which we have.

the package is more then just forestry, and more then just the auto industry.... it's also going into infrastructure accross the country, and many other sectors then just two or three.

All of the money will be coming with conditions, which each company applying for it has to prove they will be a viable company and show how they plan on changing to help create more business, jobs and be competitive in the market.

This isn't a free handout. And who cares if the majority of the market was in the US.... it isn't now, but that doesn't mean people can use their brains to go and find new markets, even within our own country.

Geezus, the BQ will use all that unsaleable lumber we buy for them to build a nice high fence around the province.

Ok, now the fearmongering is getting a tad ridiculous.

I become increasingly convinced what we need is a new election.

Even if the same numbers are returned, then Canadians will have walked into this fiasco willingly. As it is, they were led to the slaughter blind-folded.

Which you can blame squarely on Harper. Get rid of the dumbass and there won't be a problem.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
If you were the Governor General, what would you do?

If I were MJ I would do a quick cost benefit analysis based on the latest phone calls from trusted advisors and do the economically smart thing and give Harper the merciful boot once and for all time into political skid row. My speech might open like this. I have every confidence in that brave group of patriots who have unshellfishly put aside there now seeming petty differances when our grave national crisis demanded their timely sacrifice. Without their bold resolve we would be in dire straits indeed. Christmas will be cancelled untill the situation improves. good evening
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
No, absolutely NONe of this is the Bloc's fault.

they are simply doing what they were elected to do, screw over Canada to the benefit of Quebec.

I have much more respectfor Duceppe than I do for Dion, or Layton.

Duceppe is the ONLY one doing what he was elected to do........my problem is with those seditious morons Dion and Layton, who have sold their political souls to Duceppe.........

Like, since when have you had a problem with seditious morons running the country?:lol:
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
I agree. I think that a new election is needed, although the public doesn't want it, it was the three stooges that forced it...

Why did they force it?

The only way to avoid this situation is to simply lay down to whatever Harper wants and basically no longer represent those who elected them into power.

They are doing their jobs.... something some people seemed to have forgotten what it looks like.

They did not create this mess. It all starts right back to Harper not bothering to co-operate and lead by example.