If you were the Governor General, what would you do?

Vanni Fucci

Senate Member
Dec 26, 2004
5,239
17
38
8th Circle, 7th Bolgia
the-brights.net
But it never happened. Everyone has a nuclear plan. Everyone talks 'what if'. Talking and doing are two different things.

Didn't it?

From conservative.ca

Facts:

  • Bloc MPs voted with Stephen Harper’s Conservative Government more than 140 times since April 2006.
  • The Bloc supported the Throne Speech setting out the Conservative Government’s platform (Hansard, April 24, 2006).
  • The Bloc supported Prime Minister Harper’s motion recognizing that the Quebecois form a nation within a united Canada (Hansard, November 27, 2007).
  • The Bloc voted in favour of the 2006 federal Budget (Hansard, May 10, 2006, vote number 6) and the 2007 federal Budget (Hansard, March 27, 2007, vote number 139).
  • The Bloc supported the softwood lumber agreement (Hansard, September 19, 2006, vote number 33) and Bill C-41 tabled by the Conservative Government to establish a $1-billion trust for the development of Canadian communities (Hansard, February 5, 2008).
Seems like they were being very supportive to me...
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Yet you were ok with the Conservatives being propped up by the Separtists?

CTV.ca | Bloc reveals intention to prop up Harper minority

Hypocracy sure is think around here these days isn't it?

Oh but then again, the Conservatives never went all the way through with the plan, so it's ok then..... :roll: even though under similar reasons (but poorer reasons) they were a hair shy from actually doing it.

If it was such an evil and "Un-Patriotic" approach to work with the Bloc (A part of our government which represents a good chunk of the Canadian population in one area) why did they even fathom the idea in the first place?

The Conservatives were making deals with both the NDP and the Bloc..... and it was ok then.... now the NDP, the Bloc are doing the same thing with the Liberals, and all of a sudden it's bloody murder?

Some people need to get off their high horses and get a reality check.

And yes, I am fully aware of the Wests' frustration in regards to being screwed around by Central Canada from the oil and such years back...... it is completely understandable.

But did it ever occur to anybody in the west that almost the very same thing is being done to us over in the East now? And you guys wonder why we're all pissy?

All of the development, funding and everything else that goes with it should be distributed equally accross the country so everybody can make a decent living. When you have unfair balances between the provinces like right now or back when Central was restricting pretty much everything you guys in the West did and taking your money at the same time...... you're going to have divides because both sides feel they are either being screwed over.... or about to be screwed over again.

And nobody wants to be in that position.

But Harper has no give and no compassion for the nation as a whole.... his only interests are for himself and to gain more and more seats, thus more power.

He's not thinking about the best interests of the nation and us, because he's so fixated on trying to win a majority so he can do what he wants with ease.... he's completely forgotten that there's a country he has to work for.

If you got a bunch of stab wounds on your body, you can try and do all the patching and stiching to the easiest wounds, but if you keep leaving the worse wounds until you're good and ready, you're going to bleed out.

Same thing here..... if he only focuses on one or two areas of the country and just simply leaves every other province to suffer and go completely to the bucket.... then that is going to create an even worse situation then what is going on now, rather then trying to collectively bring up each community accross the country in a balanced way.

There is no unity when half or more of the country feels they are being selected out as being the bad guys by our Prime Minister. And there is no unity when isolationalist tactics are created within a country to keep power, when democratically, it is no longer his if the GG wishes it so.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
31,711
11,507
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
My Dear Colpy,

With all due respect to you....

If the Bloc was able to get into Federal politics why didn't someone start `an Ontario Bloc` to offset them?

It is beyond my comprehension that it wasn't done.

Now all of this, and I beg to differ, is the Bloc's fault? I think not.

The Bloc had foresight to protect themselves and no-one else did.

Now, in your opinion they are a force to be reckoned with.

They are a legal Federal party, regardless of what they do or do not.

Just a personal observation and opinion.

regards,
scratch

Scratch....you have a point here. The Bloc simply opened the door. If you want to
fight that fire, you have to start your own fire. Why didn't someone start an
Ontario Bloc? Someone has to step up to the plate.
 

Vanni Fucci

Senate Member
Dec 26, 2004
5,239
17
38
8th Circle, 7th Bolgia
the-brights.net
VF,

Harpo and Duceppe in bed together. Hmmmm.

IMO. Voting with does not necessarily mean supporting in my opinion.

scratch

Well scratch, we know from his 2004 letter to the GG that he had intentions to form a coalition with the NDP and Bloc to oust the Liberals if they lost the confidence vote...that is a matter of public record...

Why should the prospect of the Bloc propping up the Cons surprise any of us now...

...and why should we give a damn if Mr. Harper is pleading with Canada to let him keep his job...

He's getting exactly what he deserves, and it's too bad we had to put up with 2 years of his bull**** before it happened...

It is unfortunate it's happened this way certainly, but I don't think it really would have happened any other way either...

My opinion is that he's a hypocrite leader of an ethically bereft party that no longer has the right to govern...however, I don't feel much different about the Liberals, so I'm in a bit of a quandry...

I think though that our best chance of getting some work out of this Parliament is to allow the coalition to proceed...

If we're forced into yet another election, then we're back to square one, and whether it's a conservative or liberal minority government, we'll still be dealing with the threat of an NDP/Bloc backed coalition ready to take over...
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
What would the Gov. General do?

Well here's what one former Gov. General would suggest:


Former governor general Edward Schreyer speaks to CTV's Canada AM from Winnipeg on Wednesday, Dec. 3, 2008.

Don't let Harper 'duck a confidence vote:' former GG
CTV.ca | Don't let Harper 'duck a confidence vote:' former GG

The former governor general who presided over the downfall of the Joe Clark government in 1980 says Governor General Michaelle Jean must not let Prime Minister Stephen Harper "duck a confidence vote."

Ed Schreyer told CTV's Canada AM in an interview aired Thursday morning, just hours before Harper headed to Rideau Hall to meet with Jean, that a government must have the confidence of the House in a parliamentary democracy.

The Tories have not said what Harper's meeting will be about, but political analysts and reporters on Parliament Hill have said they expect the prime minister to ask for a prorogation. If granted, the prorogation would end the current session of Parliament before an expected confidence vote on Monday, one Harper would likely lose.

"Any group that presumes to govern must be willing to face and seek the confidence of Parliament, and it mustn't be evaded and it mustn't be long avoided. I can't put it any more succinctly than that," Schreyer said.

Schreyer then hammered home his point even more clearly and in no uncertain terms.

"I must come back to your use of the words, 'to duck a confidence vote,'" he said responding to a question.

"That must simply not be allowed to happen."

Schreyer has said that Parliament could take a short break over the holidays, but not solely to allow the Harper government avoid a confidence vote.

Schreyer, a former premier of Manitoba who ran federally for the NDP in 2006, was the governor general when former Progressive Conservative prime minister Joe Clark's government was defeated in a confidence vote in 1980.

He said the Office of the Governor General will make decisions based on procedures, traditions and the law. He added that he had and maintains a very high regard for Clark, but he did not immediately grant his request to dissolve Parliament.

"In the event that an alternative group was willing to come forward to form government, I would have felt obliged to grant a commission to form such a government," he said.

There you have it from one former GG.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
As much as I know how some here love Unions:


Governor General Michaelle Jean arrives in Ottawa, Wednesday Dec. 3, 2008.

GG should allow coalition government: unions
CTV.ca | GG should allow coalition government: unions

TORONTO -- The heads of three of Canada's largest industrial unions will join hands today to urge the Governor General to allow a coalition government.

Prime Minister Harper will visit Rideau Hall today where he's expected to ask Michaelle Jean to suspend Parliament until the end of January.

However, Dave Coles, of the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union, Ken Neumann of the United Steelworkers and CAW president Ken Lewenza want Michaelle Jean to let a coalition government lead Canada.

In a joint statement, they say proroguing Parliament "would further derail the economy at a time when drastic support is needed."

They also say industries they represent, such as steel production, the auto industry and forestry, have been devastated by job losses since 2003.

The union leaders, who will hold a joint news conference in Toronto, say dissolving Parliament would come at the expense of already hard-hit communities, workers and families.

Should Jean not agree to Harper's request to suspend Parliament, Liberal Leader Stephane Dion is poised to lead an Liberal-NDP coalition, supported by the Bloc Quebecois, under a deal signed earlier this week.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Observation: After listening to arguments on both sides (and on both forums) I conclude that most opinions expressed are those that have been fed to the public by corporate media. I am not hearing a lot of original thought.

This hornet's nest is another controlled media drama designed to divide and conquer, feeding upon party affiliation and regional prejudices. Not too many people are dealing with facts and are emotional to the point of being irrational.
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss
I don't understand all this talk of changing party loyalties over this mess. Whatever on earth for? I can honestly not see where one party or one leader has conducted themselves with any more or less integrity towards the citizens of Canada throughout this.

No, you're right there Zan. And on further thought, a vote for Conservatives wouldn't change a thing coming from me anyway, as they get voted in here no matter what. BUT.... that being said, I'm glad I never voted for any of these freaking morons. My biggest thing is that it angers me immensely that, in a time when we're all being warned to tighten our belts, an attempt to do so and scrap the relatively recent Liberal election fund distribution, is what's set off something that's going to cost our government a LOT of money. No matter how this turns out, it's already been costly to us. That is what has me spitting mad. Harper should have known better, but, the opposition has also shown that they need to learn to react better. I think Colpy's got it right... hang 'em all (figuratively speaking) and start over.
 

Praxius

Mass'Debater
Dec 18, 2007
10,677
161
63
Halifax, NS & Melbourne, VIC
Hmmm...I'd like to hear her reasoning behind this decision...

As would I.... I'd like to hear her explain her reasons directly to the people of Canada.

I certainly don't want to be hearing it from the Conservatives or from Harpers mouth because I no longer consider them a valid political party or a valid prime minister.... and he doesn't represent me.
 

Trex

Electoral Member
Apr 4, 2007
917
31
28
Hither and yon
a rock----------->Michaelle Jean<-----------a hard place

Exactly.

The woman was actually doing a pretty fair job.
Light years ahead of Adrianne Clarkson and her elitist hubby.

Michelle Jean was becoming very popular in Europe and most nations with a large ethnic population.

And now this?
She cannot win.

History dictates that she try to follow the will of the sitting PM.
But lets face it no matter what she does people will howl.

People should cut her some slack.
She didn't cause this nightmare.
Trex
 

Zzarchov

House Member
Aug 28, 2006
4,600
100
63
I sympathize, really. My instincts aren't any different. Hang 'em all and start over. But we have a government of laws, not men, and what's going on is within the law, however repulsive the men doing it might be. If it's true that we get the government we deserve, I'd sure like to know what we've done to deserve this.

Pretended we are too busy for electoral reform for 141 years?

I mean, the Prime Minister's job description is basically "To be announced"

In 141 years we couldn't upgrade our electoral system from a half assed colonial scheme meant to be temporary in many areas?
 

mt_pockets1000

Council Member
Jun 22, 2006
1,292
29
48
Edmonton
Exactly.

The woman was actually doing a pretty fair job.
Light years ahead of Adrianne Clarkson and her elitist hubby.

Michelle Jean was becoming very popular in Europe and most nations with a large ethnic population.

And now this?
She cannot win.

History dictates that she try to follow the will of the sitting PM.
But lets face it no matter what she does people will howl.

People should cut her some slack.
She didn't cause this nightmare.
Trex

I'm sometimes on the fence about our Governor General and her role in our governmental system. 90% of the time she does nothing more than promote Canada around the world, attend a few ceremonies and generally look hawt in the latest fashion. But this time around she has been called to make a very important decision, one that will impact our country forever. Without her, the bozos on the hill would carry on this charade until the first one blinks and it would never be resolved. What worries me most about proroging parliament is the economic problems will be shelved indefinitely until such time Harper sees fit to table his budget or an election is called. We, the citizens, are being held hostage by a broken system and by power hungry politicians in my opinion.