ِHow disbelievers worked to impede the Quran
- Thread starter selfsame
- Start date
Quran 21: 46, which means:
{If a blast, out of your Lord's chastisement, touches them d, they will then say: "Alas for us! We have been wrong-doers." e}
...................................................................
d It means: If a wave of severe heat or a stormy wind or another kind of affliction which they cannot withstand.
e It means: At that time, they will admit their guilt and will pray their Lord to remove the affliction from them.
GHETTO ... which sounds like BINGO ..
Which means: you will return to your Ghetto; you have been given a chance but you proved evil ones and devils.
I'm sorry, but your response is uncoordinated. I speak for the faithful. I wrote some versions of the Qur'an. It is infantile to attempt to use my words to defend yourself against me.
I'm returning to my overpriced apartment in Ottawa that overlooks the mosque at which I toss homemade pork pies. Homemade is always better, ja?
I also created Barry Manilow.
In the same way that I wrote much of the Qur'an, Barry wrote many of the songs.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sc3WBqpT4GE
I'm returning to my overpriced apartment in Ottawa that overlooks the mosque at which I toss homemade pork pies. Homemade is always better, ja?
I also created Barry Manilow.
In the same way that I wrote much of the Qur'an, Barry wrote many of the songs.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sc3WBqpT4GE
Last edited:
Yeah? In what language?
"Yea, though I walk through the porcine valley, I shall fear no bacon. Thy ham and thy pork chops shall comfort me. He maketh me sit down to a pig roast and he showereth me in pork rinds." - Mohammy (pigs be under him)
The real dangers of Islam are its claim to be the last revelation from God that corrects all others, and the fact that no separation of church and state is possible or necessary in Islam. No other faith makes that first claim, and it makes Islam uniquely intolerant of dissent. The penalty for apostasy is death. All others are open to additional revelation, and the other monotheisms actively seek and expect it. On the second point, vesting religious and secular authority in the same people and institutions is a proven recipe for tyranny and oppression and that's what Islam mandates, the church and the state are the same institutions. Disbelievers impede the Quran because it's the right thing to do, it's a mythological document from a pre-scientific and largely pre-literate age that has almost no relation to reality.
Would it not stand to reason then that just because someone views God differently than you, believes differently, worships differently, that does not mean they are somehow not going to Heaven? As you said, not even believers have the same levels of belief and differ according to their work.
Yet by your own words, anyone who does not see God as YOU do are vile, evil, etc and so on.
By your own words you say to others "you don't believe" even if they do. To you they do not believe because they do not follow God as YOU think God should be followed. Yet to their beliefs they are doing just as they should.
You are speaking hypocrisy.
I read that as forbidding any editing of the book, and given the many versions of it there are it seems to be inoperative. In any event, the claim to have the final revelation is not part of Christian dogma, it's somewhat anxiously awaiting the Second Advent and the final covenant between man and god. It looks to be pretty nasty if Revelation is to be believed, but fortunately there's no compelling reason to think any of it's true. The book ends with the promise that the Second Advent is imminent,something Paul clearly believed too, still unfulfilled after almost 2000 years. Hard to take that seriously.
Just pointing out some of the fallacies of your cult. The fact that anyone is stupid enough to believe your gawd never ceases to amaze me.
I hope I do a better job with this than I did about day and night on the moon.
The worst of the trumps is the return of the 'sons of God' from Ge:6 and the Beast from the Pit is from that era so people will get a living example of just who is who and Jude's version of who they are is a good primer for who Revelations is mentioning in a literal sense.
That would seem to average out to be 2,000 years for each event and 2,000 for the 'time of the Gentiles' does not appear to be out of proportion. There are some pretty detailed timelines available should they be needed.
The two witnesses will have the same sort of 'gifts' that Moses and Jesus had but that does not save them from going to the grave for the stated time, they are resurrected back to life before the deadline for becoming a believer is over and that would seem to be an event that would remove all doubt about what certain terms in the book actually mean.
That directive is also on the last page of the Bible. Since there are many copyright versions of the English version of the 'Holy Bible' you need a certain variance in the actual text, that also goes for the name of the book itself. The first English version is the KJV1611 edition and according to the preface to the Holy Bible the text is from the original Greek for the NT and the original Hebrew for the OT. The translators did the Greek into English and the OT was translated into English by Jews in Jerusalem and that would have been based on the written version that was made during the time Daniel (and others) were in exile in Babylon. Because God is the author of the book the same 'sermon' He gave to Moses was restored to that condition as that has a bearing on what was added when the NT was added to the overall text. It also lends support that Ge:3:15 and the two bruises have a large impact on how the book's prophetic passages should be taken. The cross was the final act in the completion of the bruise to the heel of the 'seed of Eve', the teachings in the NT are slightly different because they are for the people that will be involved in the final events that will be the completion of the other bruise and all that comes with that.
Considering most do not use the 1611 text that is a good thing because it would be full of errors if the versions are compared. You cannot be a 'child of the light' and not claim to have the correct doctrine for what all the ancient prophecies mean to the generation that is around of the time that Revelations covers, 3 1/2 years from when the prophecies start to unwind until the return and people that are alive receive a glorified body once they visit the literal river from Eze:47.
The anxious part is caused by having more than 1 doctrine being preached. The part that takes away the fear is understanding what the prophecies promote and what they don't when viewed that 'the book' from Re:22 is a reference to Genesis also as it takes all of it to paint the picture the book promotes.
The change from being mortal to being immortal. 144,000 from the 12 Tribes and 1/3 of the Gentiles on the planet will be considered to be 'children of the light' and all other people will need a resurrection from the grave in order to take part in the new covenant when Adam and Eve and all their children are back in the Garden and know about good and evil and are alive again in an earth that is now a perfected place as mankind is where they were originally intended to be if the Bible is a book of truths.
That is how you convert people who think they are the definition of what nasty means. The part that should be of interest is the return of 'proof' being available as a means of triggering faith. The Saul/Paul conversion was between Jesus and somebody He was gathering because it was that time in the 'book'. The Gospel of Luke gives us the Lord's Prayer and that what you say when you are earnestly looking for God. Saul would have qualified and he was the first person to have his prayers answered according to the De:4:30 prophecy about protection from harm. Paul went through a few 'needless' ship-wrecks and lived so I assume that was equal to 'walking on water'.
The worst of the trumps is the return of the 'sons of God' from Ge:6 and the Beast from the Pit is from that era so people will get a living example of just who is who and Jude's version of who they are is a good primer for who Revelations is mentioning in a literal sense.
Sure there is, one person with an e-bible can use it as an index to find most of the prophecies in the OT that apply to the bruise to the serpent's head.
The OT covers 4,000 years and it covers why Ge:3:15 was determined and it covers the events leading up to the last 3 1/2 years before there would be a fulfillment of the bruises. One of the main prophecies was the Bible had to be distributed to the 4 corners of the globe and 1500AD was the earliest that could have happened and the 'increase in knowledge' Daniel mentions is when believers could 'study' the book on their own at a rate that would allow detailed searches be done and the computer is the device that allows a single person to do something like that.
That would seem to average out to be 2,000 years for each event and 2,000 for the 'time of the Gentiles' does not appear to be out of proportion. There are some pretty detailed timelines available should they be needed.
The two witnesses will have the same sort of 'gifts' that Moses and Jesus had but that does not save them from going to the grave for the stated time, they are resurrected back to life before the deadline for becoming a believer is over and that would seem to be an event that would remove all doubt about what certain terms in the book actually mean.
The book isn't meant to make believers out of everybody, resurrection from the grave is the first proof of God that most people will see.