I did see them, and I didn't condemn them because I agree with them,
I'm not sure if I recall any pictures other than attractive women in army fatigues. That would be considered modeling rather than soldiering.
All that really means is that you welcome the support no matter what form it comes in, just because it is lower than you would allow yourself to go doesn't mean you line drawn in the sand would be considered 'sound thinking' by your peers who are in their 'right mind'. As I will point out that does come with some justification.
I just express myself differently.
Let me guess, from a position of superior intellect and moral judgment that is flawless so if you have to stoop to troll like mover that is only because the other person is some form of troll, or worse, has superior knowledge to your version of 'things' and around here you are supposed to the the 'Mr. |Science Guy' who is never wrong. Should you ever have to explain why the other person is wrong it is delivered as the closing statement of the judge rather than newbie Lawyer who has a shaky case at best and that is based on their own opening statement. Listen but don't speak after being 'informed of the facts' and should any rebuttal be posted you just ignore it and move on like it was never posted. That is 'your usual style' should you actually 'lower yourself' to reply to somebody who has obviously gotten it all wrong.
Evidently you're not familiar with the idea of free speech and what it means in a civilized society.
If your version of 'free' was closely examined there is one thing that would stand out immediately, you don't mind throwing out 'insults' while 'demanding' none be used against you or the 'debate' will be finished. If there were more Muslims around the forum that might show that you have a phobia rather than you conduct being based on personal experience.
Your 'innocent statement' is loaded to the hilt with subtle propaganda because what is being promoted is an opinion of the speaker alone rather than being some sort of fact that has been verified by many to be true. Free according to your 'list of demands' for the 'other side' and a list of rights on 'your side'. A lot more could be said about your style of writing being passive aggressive or filled with sarcasm to the point there should be no logical reply that would put that statement into doubt. The 2nd term is 'civilized society' when we have places called Reservations that for the last 100 years or so have contained a specific population who have been 'tortured and tormented' in violation of our own laws. Those breaches will not be fixed nor investigated either so fixing 'mistakes' is not an ability 'they' have. (False Christians and Warring Atheists) They do make a good pair there is no doubt about that as they can blame each other for what gets exposed and the 'fix' just never quite seems to be found.
You version of civilized would be looked as as 'gang activity' as the same ones you refuse to condemn, even though you say you disagree with their methods, are welcomed in what they post once you have opened up with your own version of 'benign condemnation'. The quality of the posts doesn't matter as a simple agreement about what you promote is a 'fact' is taken as support you are promoting something other than your opinion which is subject to flaws, just like everybody else.
They have every right to mock and ridicule you and anything you believe in,
You certainly don't take that stance when it is your understanding of things that is put on the table and closely examined. The sore thumb example is the message that is in Revelations (and the rest of the Bible) that you have settled for and any other version no matter how superior it is as far as having obvious holes or conflicts. You may have noticed my posts keep expanding on some part in the 'overall picture' but is always considered to be 'finer detail'. I'll take this part of your statement to be the authority to show how the version you have already stated is flawed at best and just stupid at worst meaning it should not have been accepted by somebody who is as intelligent as you say you are.
up to and including the Quran, the Prophet, and Allah, just as you are free to spout all the nonsense you do in here, unless you or they cross some line that gets people tossed out. I believe that's already happened to you here once, under a different user name.
Before that person was ejected was there any 'gang' activity by you and the 'usual suspects' who are the ones postings pic in this case. I assume they were also the ones lending the same kind of support back then. Call it 5 against 1 for lack of a better term, could the 5 of you hold off 50 fire breathing Muslims in a thread you have started that explains why Atheism is the real religion and the God of the Bible is a mythical character from ancient times. I can see you and the usual suspects packing up quite early in the thread.
Your method for a Christian is to label them insane and that about sums them up in everything they(we) have to say about anything is just as insane. In my case the insanity is based on your opinion before you have heard about the 'summation' let alone any of the finer details of why the Holy Bible is a book unlike any others in any of our libraries. As these details get posted you condemnation will begin to be seen as 'the flaw' in the understanding of what the book stands for as that alone is the best proof of God a person can find today. That it escaped you massive brain-power leads to the 'fact' that some of your other 'facts' might be flawed opinions also.
I
Oh, and those were pork pictures, not porn pictures. People aren't allowed to post porn in here, that's one of the things that'll get them tossed out.
Didn't somebody post some pic that was a representation of beastiality between a 'Muslim and a mule' or something like that? I don't recall they got the boot for that pic so are you sure about that 'rule'?
you're trying to reason with a tree stump. Selfslop listens to no one. His brain has been saturated with bullsh*t
Nice to have your voice or reason come along and point that out after the fact. This your usual suck up post or are you the 2nd person that will lead to a pack attack because that is the only method you clowns know.
Yes, you did answer, with a negative, and yet your own words betray you by stating just the opposite. You said yourself that anyone who sees/hears the words of the Quran, yet deny God through them, will not reach Heaven. Yet you admitted had people not heard those words, they would not know, thus would be given a boon.
Christians used the same trick on non-Christians all the time.
Hearing and believing are 2 different things and in this case hearing the term 'God' is all that is required for a person not to be considered to am 'infidel' that will suffer God's wrath on the day Christ come calling according to the 3 various religions that follow this one God, the one true God specifically. To know what that means you also have to have some inkling as to what is to be believed, if it isn't in the most authoritative version of the English Bible then you are probably stretching it. That being said the book speaks for itself so doing magic tricks with the text will not take up much of your time. There is a tipping point where the reader understands the text in the right contest at reading speed as that will not be the first time they have read a certain passage.
It's not a lie because if you thought about it, you'd see the validity of it. You come here and say the words of your Quran and then claim anyone who does not follow your version of the Quran - your version of faith, belief, and God - is going to hell, they will not gain Heaven, etc.
I don't know the book well enough to know if something more happens in the story. The Christian version says that the ones that go to hell are there for a specific period of time and then they are brought back from that place when their punishment is considered to be completed. Since that is before the start of the new earth verses (Isa:65) they will also be alive at the start of the new earth verses and they are the ones that will make their homes outside of New Jerusalem. There are very few Christians that believe that way and most have the flawed view that Jesus gave certain people the right to determine that certain people were not worth saving. That is were insanity sets in for the false Christians.
I am only pointing out that there are so many versions of the Quran, just as there are versions of the Bible. As such, you, nor anyone really, can dictate who will not gain Heaven and who will. Even your own Religion has it's various beliefs in how to worship God.
There is only one doctrine so if you have another version you need to switch Bibles, not rocket science.
This thread is about disbelievers impeding the Quran - but your OWN PEOPLE impede the Quran as much as any disbeliever. In fact, YOUR OWN PEOPLE are the ones doing damage to the Quran, MORE than any disbeliever.
When false Christians hire Muslims to do stupid things for the camera that is hardly a religious movement.
