Sanitary conditions in N. Canada know no racial or rez boundaries.
It only becomes an issue because there's money to be made.
Sanitary conditions in N. Canada know no racial or rez boundaries.
There has always been money to be made. It's the lack of interest of going and making money that is the issue. It takes balls.It only becomes an issue because there's money to be made.
There has always been money to be made. It's the lack of interest of going and making money that is the issue. It takes balls.
If people don't have clean water, you need to give them clean water.
What does whether or not something happened have to do with solving the problems that already exist. If people don't have clean water, you need to give them clean water. I leave worrying about the reasons and the history for the lack of clean water to folks like you...that are full of ****.
No sh*t, Sherlock!
True, why do you do that?You would think so but some folks want to spend their time whining about it and making excuses.
Zoom.![]()
It's so complicated that....
...a one stop solution is the way to go?
So you think we should go in to all the reserves and impose our will upon those who live there? Because there is no poverty or sub-standard living conditions in any Canadian municipality right?
What about those reserves that don't have horrendous sanitary conditions? You know, the successful ones that don't live in squalor, what about those?
This solution would also require us to willfully neglect all treaty and land claims both with current and pending court challenges as well as ones that have been settled. Or do we just strip them of all their constitutional rights as well?
You do realize that treaty rights of aboriginal peoples in Canada is recognized in the Constitution right? Do we just scrap that too?
A one-stop solution to make Indians Canadians, yes. Because the treaties in the old days meant something, there was a power balance in the 16th to 19th centuries, now there isn't, they lost.
But the Crown did, thus the contract is binding.Treaty means contract, an exchange of benefits, we get none from Indians now.
Of course, now that you have what you want, break the contract.The honour of the crown just means money from the crown now. The traffic is all one way, time to end it.
If you're going to invoke the Charter, the contracts you keep demanding be broken, are protected by the Charter.In the Constitution it discusses rights in a free and democratic society.
I've asked you and cannuck numerous times, what these 'more rights' are.Now Indians have more rights, entrenched in the constitutiion, and that is not justifiable in a free and democratic society. Equality for all is justice.
Ya, if you ignore peoples basic Charter rights, and contractual law.All the court claims can be wound down, it will take time, but it can be done.
You'll owe more then $10,000 a year for 5 years/Status Native, in just breach of contract suits.Say, pay all Indians $10,000 each for five years, which is what the Dept of Indian Affairs spends right now, but that $10 billion yearly is largely eaten up by paper pushers like bureaucrats and lawyers.
You just said it was largely eaten up by bureaucrats and lawyers. So what's left after that?$10 billion per year, for what?
A one-stop solution to make Indians Canadians, yes.
Treaty means contract, an exchange of benefits, we get none from Indians now.
Now Indians have more rights, entrenched in the constitutiion,
Oh, you mean like Russell Peters?
Only the entire country.
Seriously, I don't want to move. All my stuff is here.
No what's entrenched in the constitution is recognition of the treaties and land claims for aboriginals. You know, all those contracts you want to break.
Perhaps we should be relocating them to some decent land that was theirs before we stole it, say some land now occupied by rich white people, preferably politicians and industrialists. Take them out of their squalor and settle them on prime real estate. It should be a national priority before any more spending on foreign military actions.Says in the link below that this reserve has been getting $50,000 per year for five years. Much of the money has gone to Las Vegas casinos, shows, night clubs and cathouses, one may surmise. Revealing the chiefs income, that'll help, as they keep on spending on whatever. Pre-modern people are not democratic and do not believe in equality.
Bob Rae called this a national disgrace, no it's not. Checking google news, there was nothing about this story outside Canada. Poor people are not news. Like Asia and Africa don't have millions of their own. Not too many jobs in remote areas of Asia either.
Harper vows 'action' on Ontario's Attawapiskat reserve
So when your article says...Much of the money has gone to Las Vegas casinos, shows, night clubs and cathouses, one may surmise.
Angela O'Leary, a filmmaker who documented the conditions in Attawapiskat in her film Canada: Apartheid Nation, said, "there's no question they're underfunded," but the First Nations report back to the federal government every year so "if they say they're squandering the money, someone at Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development is accountable."
See last reply. Although First Nations Leadership, need to make their payroll a matter of public knowledge.Revealing the chiefs income, that'll help, as they keep on spending on whatever.
No, they just have matriarchal societies, provide programs available to anybody, and have constitutions that other countries have copied.Pre-modern people are not democratic and do not believe in equality.