‘Hell to pay:’

hunboldt

Time Out
May 5, 2013
2,427
0
36
at my keyboard
I'm flattered that you would consider me a wide eyed innocent. :lol:

There is a real difference between what you suggest and the truth. I need proof, not unfounded conjecture. I will change my views when someone presents proof, not presumptions.

What you are talking about - the suggestion of Canada as a feudal theocracy - has absolutely nothing to do with what happened in High River, unless you believe a religious figure ordered the search, or religion somehow influenced the RCMP's actions. If you wish to make that argument, I'll need substantiation. Harper may attend church, but his beliefs did not figure into what happened in High River - not even indirectly.

Should you wish to argue that the government is using "a combination of surveillance, secrecy, and a blind worship that the 'American Corporate Structures' will make it ' all good for us' where in reality- they extract and run." then I suggest that you start another thread that discusses the evils of the CPC and how they are changing Canada. Be ready to provide evidence for that statement as well.

Innocence has nothing to do with it. Accusations without proof are meaningless.

In the meantime, we should continue to discuss the issue of the RCMP seizing firearms. Did they act lawfully? So far, nothing has been brought forward that shows the government ordered the Mounties to seize private property. Until evidence to that effect emerges, it's a lot of nonsensical talk.


Hey Murph, if you want a thread on anything started, show some initiative - and start it yourself.
That's how its done here- Big Chief.
 

hunboldt

Time Out
May 5, 2013
2,427
0
36
at my keyboard
Hey Murph, if you want a thread on anything started, show some initiative - and start it yourself.
That's how its done here- Big Chief.

But, somehow I doubt if :
then I suggest that you start another thread that discusses the evils of the CPC and how they are changing Canada. Be ready to provide evidence for that statement as well.

means Murph actually starts a thread...
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
Quote: Originally Posted by hunboldt
Hey Murph, if you want a thread on anything started, show some initiative - and start it yourself.
That's how its done here- Big Chief.

But, somehow I doubt if :
then I suggest that you start another thread that discusses the evils of the CPC and how they are changing Canada. Be ready to provide evidence for that statement as well.

means Murph actually starts a thread...

I had to come see this highly profound post with my own eyes.

I got 7 pm's, 13 text messages and a phone call about this.

You actually quoted yourself?

bravo...






 

hunboldt

Time Out
May 5, 2013
2,427
0
36
at my keyboard
Quote: Originally Posted by hunboldt
Hey Murph, if you want a thread on anything started, show some initiative - and start it yourself.
That's how its done here- Big Chief.

I had to come see this highly profound post with my own eyes.

I got 7 pm's, 13 text messages and a phone call about this.

You actually quoted yourself?

bravo...








AWW- the poor lil' darlinngs.. Twenty one sobbing lil fellows? MY heart - bleeds for their angst...

Harperites are SUCH a sensitive collection of souls....
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
Quote: Originally Posted by hunboldt
Hey Murph, if you want a thread on anything started, show some initiative - and start it yourself.
That's how its done here- Big Chief.

I had to come see this highly profound post with my own eyes.

I got 7 pm's, 13 text messages and a phone call about this.

You actually quoted yourself?

bravo...







From what I've seen in this and other threads, some people have difficulty reasoning. If you wish to debate, you should present evidence to support your position. Sadly, some posters do not and it diminishes their credibility.
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
As has been posted throughout the thread, posters have suggested that Harper or the government is responsible for the RCMP's actions, Canada is a feudal theocracy and that the RCMP are "Harper's Gestapo". To me, these posts are only made to inflame, are unsubstantiated and juvenile since no supporting evidence is presented.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
As has been posted throughout the thread, posters have suggested that Harper or the government is responsible for the RCMP's actions, Canada is a feudal theocracy and that the RCMP are "Harper's Gestapo". To me, these posts are only made to inflame, are unsubstantiated and juvenile since no supporting evidence is presented.



Are you sqyong that the RCMP are not controlled by the sitting government? If not, then who is in charge and control of the RCMP?
 

hunboldt

Time Out
May 5, 2013
2,427
0
36
at my keyboard
As has been posted throughout the thread, posters have suggested that Harper or the government is responsible for the RCMP's actions, Canada is a feudal theocracy and that the RCMP are "Harper's Gestapo". To me, these posts are only made to inflame, are unsubstantiated and juvenile since no supporting evidence is presented.


Actually, my exact wording was that

We are being conditioned to accept, not the open market , private entrepreneurial economy that Reform promised,- but instead a weird form of feudal theocracy - a combination of surveillance, secrecy, and a blind worship that the 'American Corporate Structures' will make it ' all good for us'
where in reality- they extract and run.


read carefully - Murph...
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
Are you sqyong that the RCMP are not controlled by the sitting government? If not, then who is in charge and control of the RCMP?

For a better understanding of how the RCMP operates, go here. Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act

The RCMP are not the government's to do with what they want. They act autonomously, following the regulations laid out in the police act.

Actually, my exact wording was that

We are being conditioned to accept, not the open market , private entrepreneurial economy that Reform promised,- but instead a weird form of feudal theocracy - a combination of surveillance, secrecy, and a blind worship that the 'American Corporate Structures' will make it ' all good for us'
where in reality- they extract and run.


read carefully - Murph...

I did read it. Canada is not moving toward some weird form of feudal theocracy, as you posted. It is a constitutional monarchy and is in no danger of changing. I have not seen anything to show that it is changing. Regardless, this has nothing to do with the RCMP's actions in High River. You haven't connected the two.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
Regurgitating who is 'in control', in charge ( boss, above boss, who hired/elected who) is not the point. We're all aware.

Harper poo-poo'd the actions and wanted guns returned, while Vic said the surge was responsible for that local directive.

What matters is which regional buckaroo decided he was gonna call his own shots and check the old long gun registry database to see where guns were and do a little pro-active 'safety confiscation'. That dude needs to be working as a wallyworld greeter now.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,225
14,251
113
Low Earth Orbit
Last edited:

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
29,025
10,972
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
That's what I've been wondering about! If the cop had walked by a home and noticed a gun in plain sight on the kitchen table I could see it. I think more on this will eventually come out. Maybe an undercover cop was sitting in a bar and over heard some nefarious plans among a bunch of thugs. There's a million possibilities but until we hear one they are under suspicion.
When was the last time you walked by someone's (anyone's) home and noticed
anything in plain sight on their kitchen table? I've been thinking, & I can't picture
any home owned by anyone I know that even has a kitchen (& thus perhaps a
kitchen table) located on the front of their home, and at a level that someone
"walking by" might actually be able to see.
Isn't a good cop expected be able to make a decision on the spur of moment (general speaking) and take the necessary action? A lot of situations just don't allow for buggering around getting permission from some bureaucrat sitting at a desk.

Uhmmmm....the whole "unreasonable search & seizure thing" I'd assume. Those
good cops that couldn't be bothered to follow the law themselves and operate inside
the same boundaries of the law shouldn't be the ones enforcing it if they see themselves
as being above it.
Are you sqyong that the RCMP are not controlled by the sitting government? If not, then who is in charge and control of the RCMP?

...and that is a VERY good question!!! At times it seems that the RCMP isn't even in charge
of the RCMP, but just the mop & cover after the fact.
For a better understanding of how the RCMP operates, go here. Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act
The RCMP are not the government's to do with what they want. They act autonomously, following the regulations laid out in the police act....

....or not, at times, it seems.
An Act? They only act like cops?

....or not, at times, it seems.


 
Last edited:

hunboldt

Time Out
May 5, 2013
2,427
0
36
at my keyboard
For a better understanding of how the RCMP operates, go here. Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act

The RCMP are not the government's to do with what they want. They act autonomously, following the regulations laid out in the police act.



I did read it. Canada is not moving toward some weird form of feudal theocracy, as you posted. It is a constitutional monarchy and is in no danger of changing. I have not seen anything to show that it is changing. Regardless, this has nothing to do with the RCMP's actions in High River. You haven't connected the two.


AGAIN you don't read what has been actually written.
The Harpo regime is not the Crown, for Gawds sake.Not the Monarchy.

However, a perceived insult to the Harpo caused you to fire off a pile of internal complaints. Then attempt weird linkages.
He's your Beloved Leader, Murph. Not mine.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
AGAIN you don't read what has been actually written.
The Harpo regime is not the Crown, for Gawds sake.Not the Monarchy.

However, a perceived insult to the Harpo caused you to fire off a pile of internal complaints. Then attempt weird linkages.
He's your Beloved Leader, Murph. Not mine.
He is Canada's leader whether you voted for him or not-:smile: