First, allow nurses and paramedics to take over many of the functions traditionally in the area of physicians, like prescription renewals and minor check-ups, and many of the mundane duties doctors now perform in hospitals.
A great suggestion. The only setback I see is the potential for liability related issues, but I'm sure that can be dealt with.
Second, pay doctors by the hour, not the patient and then you'd get rid of assembly line medicine practiced by a lot of physicians in which they line up 40 or fifty patients in a waiting room, channel them off into cubicles, and then give them the requisite 15 minutes of consultation; while popping out to consult other patients at the same time.
Fair enough, but that may be more expensive in the end... As far as I know, family physicians make somewhere in the range of $25/patient and while some will say that a doc sees 'umpteen' patients per day, don't forget that out of that fee comes lease payments, staff expenses, supplies, etc.... Being a family doc is not a ticket to print money in any way.
Third, break the monopolistic hold of the Canadian Medical Association (and its provincial equivalents) on the certification of doctors and increase the number of physicians Canada-wide to bring in some real competition.
The big criticism I have with the CMA relates to the certification process of foreign docs that seek to immigrate to Canada. That said, as far as the monopoly is concerned, if you want recognized physicians, have a greater through-put at the university level. If what you seek is to have holistic practices recognized and paid for from the public purse, then apply political pressure at the provincial level.
As it stands, alternative options exist, but "you gotta pay to play", so the option is entirely yours.
Fourth, eliminate the twenty year patent on pharmaceuticals that the Mulroney government gave to the large drug companies. Since the large drug companies have not kept their promise to increase research facilities in Canada that would only be fair. Perhaps lower it to ten years instead.
I'm on the fence on this, but suffice to say, the cost of developing new drugs is extremely high and one of the reasons has to do with the rigorous testing by the FDA (Cdn equivalent). That is certainly an absolute requirement, but if you eliminate the profit potential for the mfgrs, then don't expect anyone to get into that game - hence, no new breakthroughs.
Five, extend the first three of the above to the dental profession and optometrists.
I don't know where this came from, but if you want to seek discount services in dental/optometry, then so be it. Right now, you can get very inexpensive dental work done in Mexico, but you take certain chances.
BTW you did not prove that French doctors make the same amount as Canadian doctors. As usual you simply denied my point without offering any proof. Ditto for the school system - please include a link to all of the new private schools that have popped up in Alberta in the last 15 years. And don't bother with Charter Schools - they are actually public schools in disguise. The real Charter Schools - those that started from scratch - all failed due to a lack of public support.
Look up the French system and experience yourself.
As for the school system, my comments are based on the observations that we all have seen over the last 15 years so spare me the nonsense about links and references. You are welcome to pretend all you like that the rise in numbers of Charter/Private schools doesn't exist, nor is it a coincidence that more licenses are granted in and around the time of ATA job actions.
That market oriented enough fer ya, Sarah?
Ya see, you had your panties all in a twist that you spelled Captain Morgan wrong.
Actually if you remember the situation it wasn't WHO that caused the panic. It was the media. There is nothing like t good panic story to draw viewers or readers and in Canada as elsewhere the media played the threat up to the max. WHO simply did what it was supposed to do - alert the world to the possibility of a worldwide flu epidemic. Can you imagine the reaction if WHO had sat back and said nothing and a real pandemic ensued without the least bit of warning?
The media didn't make the press releases for WHO and it is no secret that the media are giant a$$holes when it comes to selling a story... The problem is that WHO released their opinion and it was speculative at best... The pandemic that never was.
The fact is that in the case of a possible epidemic it is better to err on the upside than to say nothing or to downplay a possible threat. If a pandemic had manifested itself on the scale of the 1918 Spanish Flu epidemic the results worldwide would have been catastrophic, both in terms of human life and the economic cost to society.
I suppose that every flu season
may represent a possible epidemic and there is the chance that a fire
may break out in any theater at any given time too.