What are the odds that this is a setup for Hamas to attack the single battalion
Americans.So who refused that deal? Israel only objected to the highway and railroad
What is the PLO demanding of Hamas?
I wish. Just stating a fact.Are you high?
A little better than 1000%What are the odds that this is a setup for Hamas to attack the single battalion
Fact or predominant piece of propaganda? Id rather hang with Muzzies than born yesterday christians.I wish. Just stating a fact.
I'm pretty sure he is just confusing the PLO for HamasWhat is the PLO demanding of Hamas?
Interesting since it was an offer from the Americans apart of the Abraham negotiationsAmericans.
Maybe David is confusing the PLO & PA (Palestine Liberation Operation & the Palestinian Authority?), but maybe not?
What is the PLO demanding of Hamas?
Maybe not.I'm pretty sure he is just confusing the PLO for Hamas
As it stated. American lefties didnt like it.Interesting since it was an offer from the Americans apart of the Abraham negotiations
I'm pretty sure he is just confusing the PLO for Hamas
Its nice to see more than "Palestine is evil and has one goal" and "Israel is more pious and righteous than Jesus".Maybe David is confusing the PLO & PA (Palestine Liberation Operation & the Palestinian Authority?), but maybe not?
Palestinian Authority - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Maybe not.
It was seen as a positive sign that Hamas backed a statement from that meeting, pledging support for the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), an umbrella group for Palestinian political movements that negotiated a previous peace deal with Israel.
International eyes have turned towards the PA as the vehicle that might - with enough reform - carry Palestinians into a new, united post-war era. The Gaza war might have exploded Palestinian politics, but one of the few things it hasn't changed is disillusionment with the PA, the body that the US is banking on to take charge of Gaza.
It is widely seen as corrupt and inefficient, and - by some - as a security enforcer for the Israeli government in the West Bank.
A poll this week by the respected Palestinian Centre for Policy and Survey Research in Ramallah suggested that a majority of Palestinians think the PA should be dissolved. And satisfaction with its president in the West Bank, Mahmoud Abbas, was just 8%.
Mr Abbas has replaced his Prime Minister, Mohammad Shtayyeh, in an effort to signal reform - or "renewal" as the American government has termed it. But it has not really moved the dial. The new prime minister, an economist called Mohammad Mustafa, has been tasked with heading a technocratic interim government, and bringing together all the Palestinian political factions - including Hamas - to find some sort of consensus around a new unified vision for the future.
Sabri Saidam, a senior Fatah official, told me that the resignation of the government was designed to "open up the floor" to other factions - like Hamas - and give them "the space to reconsider their political stance, and their obligations in the future - and also their role, given the changes that have happened since 7 October".
"We have been talking to Hamas indirectly," he said. "We have restated the importance of adhering to the […] two-state solution," referring to the idea that Israelis and Palestinians could live side-by-side in separate countries.
It was seen as a positive sign that Hamas backed a statement from that meeting, pledging support for the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), an umbrella group for Palestinian political movements that negotiated a previous peace deal with Israel.
But that feelgood moment in Moscow (‘cuz Russian Jews?) was quickly shattered when Hamas reacted furiously to the appointment of Mr Mustafa, accusing Mahmoud Abbas of acting unilaterally and taking "empty steps" without national consensus.
"Hamas did not react the way we had anticipated," said Sabri Saidam, although he believes it follows a familiar pattern of behaviour by the group."We hear some positive remarks [from Hamas], but then when it comes to practical engagement, there's always a setback," he told me.
Fatah hit back, accusing Hamas of triggering "a catastrophe" for the Palestinian people by attacking Israel on 7 October; a catastrophe that was worse, it said, than the displacement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in 1948, when the Israeli state was created.
Sabri Saidam says the party is now waiting to see whether this incident marks the end of Hamas talking to the PLO, "or is just a reflection of the chaos Hamas is in".
It's early days, but so far the "renewal" of the PA hasn't yet delivered either unity with rival political factions, or credibility with the Palestinian people.
To what extent Hamas still holds power in Gaza, after more than five months of war, is complicated and difficult to assess. There have been reports of law and order breaking down, and of armed gangs linked to Gaza's big families competing for resources.
But Hamas fighters are still confronting Israeli forces across the Gaza Strip, most of its top leadership still appear to be free, and Israel says several Hamas battalions remain intact in the southern border town of Rafah.
Even the civilian committees responsible for distributing aid in Gaza City are overwhelmingly “affiliated” with Hamas, one resident said.
Any new administration in Gaza will need to have at least the tacit support of the group or face ongoing friction, or an insurgency.
The dilemma will be how to give Hamas a voice - even a discreet one - without triggering resistance from influential outside powers like the US - and, of course, from Israel, which is also trying to veto any role for the PA in Gaza.
That dilemma is compounded by continued support for Hamas across both Palestinian territories.
Support spiked in the first few months of the war, and now seems to be falling a bit, but a majority of those interviewed by the Palestinian Centre for Policy and Survey Research said they wanted Hamas to run Gaza after the war; only 11% wanted the PA to take charge there.
Israel-Gaza briefing: Is now the time Palestinian politics can start afresh?
With many challenges ahead, the future of Palestinian leadership is yet to be decided, writes Lucy Williamson.www.bbc.com
The day after US, UK and France said "we're cutting you off", Israel miraculously returned to the bargaing table. Coincidence?
The Israel withdrawal is a set up for Hamas and Hezbollah to show their true colors and resume their attacks on Israel as seen in the above within a day of withdrawing Hamas started a rocket attack. Israel will point and say see and kick into high gear and finish their operation.The day after US, UK and France said "we're cutting you off", Israel miraculously returned to the bargaing table. Coincidence?
Is that what it is? Israel didnt get threatened by their biggest donors? Its all a set up created by Hamas?The Israel withdrawal is a set up for Hamas and Hezbollah to show their true colors and resume their attacks on Israel as seen in the above within a day of withdrawing Hamas started a rocket attack. Israel will point and say see and kick into high gear and finish their operation.
Created by Israel to prove that Hamas can not be trusted. Despite what all our left leaning politicians want us to believe.Is that what it is? Israel didnt get threatened by their biggest donors? Its all a set up created by Hamas?
Dont be silly. Thats far fetched.
You really think Israel pulled out to let Hamas attack rather than they feared hearing "we'll cut you off if..."?Created by Israel to prove that Hamas can not be trusted. Despite what all our left leaning politicians want us to believe.