I'm wondering how this conversation would change should it come out that this nut was a registered Democrat?...
A lot of people assume that he was a Palin supporter................
Time will tell
Guess he'd still be a nut with easy access to guns.
I'm wondering how this conversation would change should it come out that this nut was a registered Democrat?...
A lot of people assume that he was a Palin supporter................
Time will tell
I guess Obama dropped the ball.Guess he'd still be a nut with easy access to guns.
I guess Obama dropped the ball.
Your point?
Ever heard of a PAL? The process should include the aforementioned requirements.
Any other stupid questions?
It was needed for deer hunting.![]()
How did this guy get a Glock with a thirty round clip? Was he considered an ideal gun owner?:roll: Didn't his web site give anyone a hint?:roll:
So you believe in censorship then?
No, I was making a point, in a sarcastic manner.Oh. So you think we should politicize this?
It won't change a thing.
Well if you've heard of a PAL, then you really shouldn't need me to explain it to you then. Should you?I've heard of a PAL. Still doesn't answer my question.
Keep asking stupid questions, just to say something, and you won't get treated like a fool.Any other stupid comments?
Don't get me wrong Ton, I actually agree with you. But in the end, free speech is what it is.No. I believe in people being accountable, and if they were to sit back and seriously ponder their actions, they could probably see how they contribute to growing partisan divides, and increasing anger amongst supporters. They could probably see how their rhetoric is contributing to the hate.
The downside of the internet.But like you already said, nothing is going to change. People who hate Palin will still hate her. People who hate Obama will still hate him. And there will be an opinion out there on a blog, or conventional media source to cater to these nutjobs. To pat them on the bottom and tell them they're special. To confirm their hatred. To reinforce their ignorance.
Too true.Time will not change the outcome...the nut will go to trial whether he's a democrat or republican
But political ideology always changes the direction of these discussion...otherwise we wouldn't be talking about it if we agreed on everything.
Don't get me wrong Ton, I actually agree with you. But in the end, free speech is what it is.
Some people don't understand that symbolism is used to sell and therefore don't understand how it might work.Some people don't understand "metaphors" and "figurative speech" and as such should shy away from debating.
Not likely.And I wouldn't have it any other way, except of course my beliefs in personal accountability that obviously aren't held as important by many in the media.
Are beer and porn companies culpable in sexual assaults?Some people don't understand that symbolism is used to sell and therefore don't understand how it might work.
Some people don't understand that symbolism is used to sell and therefore don't understand how it might work.
By saying that you obviously haven't clue. Not very smart at all.Smart people have no problem differentiating. :smile:
Project much?
Speaking of twisting and turn...You didn't ask me to explain PALs to you.
Well troll, I find myself in a conundrum. I guess, unlike yourself, I'll have to eat some of my own words (Oh what a Joey thing to do) and say the Feds should.That's right I didn't. So, lets just forget you even brought them up. The question was posed to you (in regards to "intense background checks, mental screening and extensive training) "who is going to do that"? Since you have so little use for bureaucrats I was just wondering how you think people that can't run a utility system can run something as complex as a mental screening. Alternatively, if you don't feel these incompetent civil servants are capable of such a difficult task, you could always explain who you think should be doing it.
And wingnuts always list "Mein Kampf" and "The Communist Manifesto" as favorites.