Thank you for affirming that the shooting is NOT the responsibility of the one who pulled the trigger.
Gun Control is Completely Useless.
- Thread starter Colpy
- Start date
Democracy is not doing well and is pretty much dead in Canada. There is no real opposition in Canada anymore. All the political party's in Canada all dance to the same globalist deep state music. They are all one and the same now. They are all out to screw you the stunned people of Canukistan. We have only liberals, pinko conservatives, socialists and communists running this country now. This fake China virus has taken away most of our rights and our freedoms from us. Our so called democratic institutions have been pretty much all taken over by the anti-democracy political party's in Canada. You have no real rights or freedoms in Canada anymore. You have only what your dear comrade leaders will allow you to have. Got it yet?
Me too. I am starting to get tired of that old Hitler picture anyway. it's passe now. But it is time for a new one and this one looks just fine to me. That Mao picture looks good on the commie prime mistake of Canukistan. LOL.
NOPE. What did either of those two do to make Canada great while they were in office? Is Canada any better off today with having those two bozos around to phuk us all? All I have ever seen from them is just more taxes, more government and less freedom at just a little slower speed to what the other lieberal and socialists would do. Harper was in the National Citizen's Coalition at one time that believed in more freedom. less government, and less taxes. But all we got from him was more government and taxes and less freedom. Why didn't he get rid of the CBC? Harper could have done so but he chickened out. AsI always keep saying now/ The conservative party is nothing more than a lieberal conservative party with the same goals in mind as the lieberal or NDP socialist party's have in mind for Chanukistan. They all belong and are controlled by the elite deep state globalists. Believe it or not.
Let's see.
Harper saw us through the greatest financial crisis for decades.
Harper raised the age of consent from 14 to 16.
Harper killed the useless, expensive long gun registry.
Harper lowered taxes for the poorest Canadians.
Harper actually armed our soldiers in Afghanistan with the equipment they needed.
Harper changed Citizen's Arrest and self defense legislation to protect shop owners arresting shop lifters (etc) and removed the requirement to retreat from criminal assault or robbery.
And on and on and on.
Harper was the best PM in the 50 years.
Not that he was perfect, far from it. He looks mighty good though, when compared to the other ideologues, incompetents, and crooks on the list.
Harper did exactly what he said he would do, with only a couple of exceptions.
https://www.facebook.com/CandiceBergenMp/videos/175733693827818
A good look at how the Liberals (with help from their even more lefty buddies) are shutting down democracy in Canada, with the pandemic as an excuse.
A good look at how the Liberals (with help from their even more lefty buddies) are shutting down democracy in Canada, with the pandemic as an excuse.
1. Did Harper have a choice? Nope. It was we the people that got thru the financial crisis as we were the ones who really had to suffer thru the crises while people like Harper never had to. Harper probably made money from the financial crises as most politicians have during any crises.
2. I doubt that stopped anything at all by raising the age limit. It all as they say no doubt just went underground.
3. What Harper should have really done was got rid of the registry altogether. A real and true conservative would have done so. But he did not. The gun registry still cost Canadians hundreds of billions of their tax dollars to help keep the registry going.
4. That may be true but do not forget that when the government gives some of our money back they will take that money back from somewhere else. No one, not even the poorest, ever will get ahead. The system does not allow that to happen. The one way to help the poorest of people is to stop giving tax dollars away to legal and illegal so called refugees, and give it to the poorest of Canadians instead.
5. Did Harper have any choice but to do so? Otherwise, probably none of those soldiers would be coming home ever again. Harper did what he had to do and that is it.
6. Is that law still in effect or has it now been changed by the Turdeau lieberals whom always appear to be on the accused's side and not the victim's side? I need to see where it still says that this is so.
7. Harper could have stayed in power if he did what he still believed in when he was in the National Citizen's coalition where he did at one time believed in more freedom, less taxes and less government. I never felt or saw any of that while Harper was the PM of Canada. If he did he would still be the PM of Canada. But instead, Harper decided that it would be in his best interest to suck up to the lieberals and socialists and hope that would get him reelected again. It did not work, and unlike Trump, a real conservative leader, he let the Canadian media make an ass of himself by not standing up to those bunch of leftist liberal parasites.
The conservative movement never seems to get the message or to learn that trying to suck up to the leftist lieberal Canadian lying media will never get conservatives anywhere. The Canadian media needs to be treated like Trump does to that leftist lieberal media in America. Trump always makes asses of them, and that is why they attack and mock him so much. They cannot get anywhere lying about Trump.
But I will agree that it would probably be a bit better with Harper still as the PM of Canada but it is too late now. A good conservative leader would never let the lying media get the better of him. Lucky for the media there is no real and true conservative PM in power. Scheer or the conservative lieberal party offers any hope for Canada. Hopefully, come the next election, the people will look and give the PPC Party the nod and let us see what a real conservative like Max Bernier can do for Canada. Could Max be any worse than what we have today? Why not give Max a shot at it. Works for me!!
It doesn't matter...……..if things had have gone "south", Harper would have born the brunt, so when they work out he deserves some credit.
Yes I agree Harper was the steadiest manager Of Canada’s government in my life . He could have done more but unfortunately was also controlled by the liberal wing of his party and they are the majority.
The Conservative party in central and eastern Canada is full of disillusioned liberals sick of liberal and Quebec corruption yet still maintaining their liberal values , hence Scheer .
The CCFR announces the launch of a court challenge against the gun ban.
And here is the Notice of Application to the Federal Court
https://firearmrights.ca/wp-content/uploads/Notice-of-Application-Filing-Copy.pdf
Best of luck to the CCFR.
If you're not a member, you should be.
And here is the Notice of Application to the Federal Court
https://firearmrights.ca/wp-content/uploads/Notice-of-Application-Filing-Copy.pdf
Best of luck to the CCFR.
If you're not a member, you should be.
Last edited:
GUNTER: Liberals shoot themselves in the foot
L
Pictured here are assault style rifles that could be subject to the Liberal government's ban. THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
The federal gun ban, announced May 1, just gets worse and worse.
At first the confiscation covered nearly a dozen popular models of rifles and about 1,500 variations of those models.
Some 250,000 guns – maybe more – would be taken from over 100,000 legal owners.
Except they wouldn’t be taken right away. The federal Liberal government doesn’t have the money (perhaps a quarter of a billion dollars or more) to “buy back” all those guns from their (non-criminal) owners.
So current owners would be allowed to keep the newly banned guns, even to the end of their lives. They just wouldn’t be able to sell, swap, shot them or take them to a range or out hunting.
How does that make any sense? The Liberals’ justification for banning these firearms is that they are too dangerous to let civilians own them. Yet in the next breath, the Liberals turned around and let every current owner hold on to his or her “military-style” firearms for as many as 70 more years.
Then we learned the ban would be authorized by an order-in-council, not by an act of Parliament. And it would be introduced when Parliament was not really sitting due to the pandemic.
This was followed by the revelation that many larger shotguns – perhaps over a million common hunting guns – could also be banned because the Trudeau government’s decree was poorly written (or deviously written) to define which guns to confiscate according to barrel size rather than a gun’s function.
Now we are learning that the Liberals – who don’t have a majority mandate to undertake such a massive confiscation – are plotting legislation that would permit municipal governments to outlaw the possession of handguns in homes.
True, more than two-thirds of firearms crimes in Canada involve handguns, but almost all of those are committed by drug dealers and gang members using illegal handguns. Legit collectors and target shooters don’t commit crimes.
If the Liberals follow through, city governments could order law-abiding handgun owners to store their firearms at some central location such as a police warehouse.
As if all of that wasn’t bad enough, we learned this week the Trudeau government chose to legislate its ban via cabinet order, because Parliament had become too – um – inconvenient.
Ed Burlew, a Toronto-area lawyer who is one the country’s foremost experts on firearms law, received a copy of an email from Kingston Liberal MP Marwan Tabbara.
In response to a constituent’s complaint about Liberal gun policy, Tabbara explained the government had chosen to confiscate hundreds of millions of dollars of personal property from law-abiding Canadians using a cabinet decree because, “We can’t get the necessary unanimous consent for introduction of a Bill on this subject and this has waited too long for action.”
Since when is there a deadline for how long you have to try democracy before you can give up and shove whatever you want into law? I guess if you’re a Liberal, it’s okay to bypass the democratic process so long as you’ve grown impatient with Parliament.
This is similar to them deciding early in the pandemic that would like the power to tax and spent at will until the end of 2021 without Parliament having any say over it.
For the last two months, the Liberals have governed largely without opposition. There have been very few sessions of Parliament during which the Liberals have been subjected to opposition questioning.
Since mid-March, government in Canada has largely consisted of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau descending the steps at Rideau Cottage and decreeing what will and will not be done.
This is then followed by a few questions from friendly journalists based largely in Quebec.
The longer the pandemic lasts, the more dictatorial the Liberals become.
https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/gunter-liberals-shoot-themselves-in-the-foot
(my emphasis)
L
Pictured here are assault style rifles that could be subject to the Liberal government's ban. THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
The federal gun ban, announced May 1, just gets worse and worse.
At first the confiscation covered nearly a dozen popular models of rifles and about 1,500 variations of those models.
Some 250,000 guns – maybe more – would be taken from over 100,000 legal owners.
Except they wouldn’t be taken right away. The federal Liberal government doesn’t have the money (perhaps a quarter of a billion dollars or more) to “buy back” all those guns from their (non-criminal) owners.
So current owners would be allowed to keep the newly banned guns, even to the end of their lives. They just wouldn’t be able to sell, swap, shot them or take them to a range or out hunting.
How does that make any sense? The Liberals’ justification for banning these firearms is that they are too dangerous to let civilians own them. Yet in the next breath, the Liberals turned around and let every current owner hold on to his or her “military-style” firearms for as many as 70 more years.
Then we learned the ban would be authorized by an order-in-council, not by an act of Parliament. And it would be introduced when Parliament was not really sitting due to the pandemic.
This was followed by the revelation that many larger shotguns – perhaps over a million common hunting guns – could also be banned because the Trudeau government’s decree was poorly written (or deviously written) to define which guns to confiscate according to barrel size rather than a gun’s function.
Now we are learning that the Liberals – who don’t have a majority mandate to undertake such a massive confiscation – are plotting legislation that would permit municipal governments to outlaw the possession of handguns in homes.
True, more than two-thirds of firearms crimes in Canada involve handguns, but almost all of those are committed by drug dealers and gang members using illegal handguns. Legit collectors and target shooters don’t commit crimes.
If the Liberals follow through, city governments could order law-abiding handgun owners to store their firearms at some central location such as a police warehouse.
As if all of that wasn’t bad enough, we learned this week the Trudeau government chose to legislate its ban via cabinet order, because Parliament had become too – um – inconvenient.
Ed Burlew, a Toronto-area lawyer who is one the country’s foremost experts on firearms law, received a copy of an email from Kingston Liberal MP Marwan Tabbara.
In response to a constituent’s complaint about Liberal gun policy, Tabbara explained the government had chosen to confiscate hundreds of millions of dollars of personal property from law-abiding Canadians using a cabinet decree because, “We can’t get the necessary unanimous consent for introduction of a Bill on this subject and this has waited too long for action.”
Since when is there a deadline for how long you have to try democracy before you can give up and shove whatever you want into law? I guess if you’re a Liberal, it’s okay to bypass the democratic process so long as you’ve grown impatient with Parliament.
This is similar to them deciding early in the pandemic that would like the power to tax and spent at will until the end of 2021 without Parliament having any say over it.
For the last two months, the Liberals have governed largely without opposition. There have been very few sessions of Parliament during which the Liberals have been subjected to opposition questioning.
Since mid-March, government in Canada has largely consisted of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau descending the steps at Rideau Cottage and decreeing what will and will not be done.
This is then followed by a few questions from friendly journalists based largely in Quebec.
The longer the pandemic lasts, the more dictatorial the Liberals become.
https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/gunter-liberals-shoot-themselves-in-the-foot
(my emphasis)
