Gun Control is Completely Useless.

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36


Right. It will lower the number of legal weapons out there...........and increase the number of illegal weapons by tens, if not hundreds of thousands. People are NOT going to turn in a lot of unregistered firearms simply because the gov't says so. That was demonstrated in 1995. In the late 1970s the Liberal gov't concluded there were 18 million guns in Canada. In 2002, there were 7 million registered. Do the math. You REALLY think this is going to be any different? The Liberals just proved our point. Never register, as the only thing registration is good for is gov't seizure.




Dimwit. Is a bolt action firearm an "assault weapon"?
Is a .22 rimfire rifle an "assault weapon"?
Is a single shot shotgun an "assault weapon"?
Is a double rifle made over 100 years ago an "assault weapon"?
Are you a complete and absolute moron?


YES! is the correct answer to one, and only one of the questions above



Idiot. Of course the law needs to be well-defined. Only a fascist dickhead like yourself would think "law is good, peasants knowing what the law means is bad"




Thus fully validating your credentials as a fascist. "The peasants don't require democratic representation of due political process. Justin is the Philosopher King!" Here's a Poly Sci 101 fact for you..........the gov't doesn't make laws, Parliament makes laws. In a democracy, anyway. I know, you hate democracy. It shows.
Remain calm.

I am going to go out on a limb and guess that sometime in the past soemone called you stupid etc and that it hurt your feelings.

The ban is what the people want.

It couldn't be more democratic.
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
I saw him on Youtube supposedly to have a "discussion" on firearms with people from the CCFA and all he did was dictate - no actual discussion and when it was pointed out to him the errors of his decisions and what was actually in the firearms act, he abruptly ended the session. He obviously is oblivious to how an actual "conversation" or "discourse" happens - he simply doesn't want to listen and it's obvious the decisions being made have absolutely nothing to do with gun safety but an ideology that feels that no one should have guns - period. He is a liar that's for sure but so is his "Leader" so I guess he and other Ministers feel it's their prerogative to lie to Canadians at their leisure with no repercussions.

JMHO
Blair is a bought and paid for liberal, Dixie, I would expect nothing less from him then the leftist - bordering on fascist - liberal dogma whose tentacles reach to every dark corner of the party. You spout the party line or you shut the **** up. If you listen to one liberal MP there is no need to listen to any other. All they do is insert the current topic into the liberal script which they all now know by rote. It would be funny if it weren't so pathetically transparent.
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
You clearly haven't been reading and listening to the posts on this thread.

In a four year period in Canada, the total number of legal firearms doubled. yet the violent crime related to illegal guns decreased by 50% in the same 4 year period.

Hoid, sorry to burst your bubble but more guns does not mean more crime.
"There are none so blind as those who will not see."

Hoidie is as deaf, dumb and blind as they come, JB. He is the perfect example of a large number of people who when faced with the actual fact of a thing refuse to accept it. Instead like the brain dead clones they are, they cling to the doctrine spoon fed to them by whatever 'influencer' is of the moment. Common sense is also a lost art with that group.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
"There are none so blind as those who will not see."

Hoidie is as deaf, dumb and blind as they come, JB. He is the perfect example of a large number of people who when faced with the actual fact of a thing refuse to accept it. Instead like the brain dead clones they are, they cling to the doctrine spoon fed to them by whatever 'influencer' is of the moment. Common sense is also a lost art with that group.


Well said, Mowich! I've been deliberately holding back on denigrating him, but I can see that was futile as "STUPID" just envelopes everything like a giant fart. :)
 

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
Well said, Mowich! I've been deliberately holding back on denigrating him, but I can see that was futile as "STUPID" just envelopes everything like a giant fart. :)






Oh dear me! I sense significant disturbance in the LIE-beral Force!


I have been saying all along that ALL LIE-beral values are failing!


And here we witness a harsh attack on one of the MOST DOGMATIC of LIE-berals!



Sadly though I would NOT SAY hemerHOID was STUPID!


I support anybody who wishes to call him rude names - but I draw the line at "stupid"!


He is not stupid!


He is MALEVOLENT!


SELFISH!



IRRESPONSIBLE!



QUITE GREEDY - AS ARE ALL LIE-berals!


He is smug and arrogant and determined to bully others - and to INSULT them as well - just to engineer the usual LIE-beral



situation where MAJOR ENTITLEMENTS may be claimed by the LIE-berals and their HOG allies!


But "stupid" really DOES NOT fit into his actions!


Unless of course you want to call him "stupid" for fighting what is rapidly becoming a losing battle in support of LIE-beral greed!


But in that case - he is not so much stupid and STUBBORN!



There now - isnt my version a much more concise description of hemerHOID?
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Oh dear me! I sense significant disturbance in the LIE-beral Force!


I have been saying all along that ALL LIE-beral values are failing!


And here we witness a harsh attack on one of the MOST DOGMATIC of LIE-berals!



Sadly though I would NOT SAY hemerHOID was STUPID!


I support anybody who wishes to call him rude names - but I draw the line at "stupid"!


He is not stupid!


He is MALEVOLENT!


SELFISH!



IRRESPONSIBLE!



QUITE GREEDY - AS ARE ALL LIE-berals!


He is smug and arrogant and determined to bully others - and to INSULT them as well - just to engineer the usual LIE-beral



situation where MAJOR ENTITLEMENTS may be claimed by the LIE-berals and their HOG allies!


But "stupid" really DOES NOT fit into his actions!


Unless of course you want to call him "stupid" for fighting what is rapidly becoming a losing battle in support of LIE-beral greed!


But in that case - he is not so much stupid and STUBBORN!



There now - isnt my version a much more concise description of hemerHOID?


I'll stick with "stupid" as I believe anyone is who persists in perpetuating all the other traits you've mentioned. :)
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
 

spilledthebeer

Executive Branch Member
Jan 26, 2017
9,296
4
36
I'll stick with "stupid" as I believe anyone is who persists in perpetuating all the other traits you've mentioned. :)






YOU ARE BEING UNFAIR to Our idiot Boy Justin!


Give him credit where credit is due!


He is wrong in so many ways that it is simply being LAZY Not to mention ALL his failures!



And it is NOT GOOD for the country to be glossing over all those BAD LIE-beral policies!
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,133
9,423
113
Washington DC

JamesBondo

House Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,158
37
48
Food for thought. The quebec government was able to force ably and legally snatch up the long gun registry against the federal government's wishes. And Ottawa was able to force the long gun registry on Albertans.

It is clear that Ottawa and quebec will use their system in any way that they can... it is about time that Alberta does the same.

Lets get the Alberta government to grow some balls and stand up for the rights of law abiding gun owners.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,133
9,423
113
Washington DC
I have a problem with a country that allows criminals, police, and military to own more guns than law abiding citizens.
I have deep amusement for people who think "criminal" is a single, immutable, knowable class.

Do you think they wear nametags or something "Hi. My Name Is Bill, and I'm a Criminal?"

I'd ask how you propose to get guns away from "criminals" without imposing a regime that would make East Germany look laissez-faire, but I doubt you'd have an answer.
 
Last edited:

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
I have deep amusement for people who think "criminal" is a single, immutable, knowable class.

Do you think they wear nametags or something "Hi. My Name Is Bill, and I'm a Criminal?"
I asked a criminal lawyer last year whom I know socially "not professionally"


So, you defend criminals?


Her Answer:.....They're only criminals if I loose...
 

JamesBondo

House Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,158
37
48
I have deep amusement for people who think "criminal" is a single, immutable, knowable class.
Do you think they wear nametags or something "Hi. My Name Is Bill, and I'm a Criminal?"
I'd ask how you propose to get guns away from "criminals" without imposing a regime that would make East Germany look laissez-faire, but I doubt you'd have an answer.

Well, I have deep amusement for people who think law abiding gun owners are criminals just because they own firearms.

Do you think firearms corrupt alberta duck hunters and cause them to commit inner city crime in toronto?

I'd ask how you propose to get the guns away from criminals without imposing a regime that would make East Germany look laissez-faire, but I doubt that you have an answer.
 

JamesBondo

House Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,158
37
48
Do you think they wear nametags or something "Hi. My Name Is Bill, and I'm a Criminal?"

Clearly, you don't know much about Canadian practices.

The Canadian government doesn't track released criminals that have served their sentence. Not even ones that are prohibited to own firearms.

But, ask the law abiding gun owners if they are tracked.

Kinda back asswards, don't you think? It is almost like they are more concerned about vetted owners than they are about criminals that should not have fire arms - criminals in their system that DON'T require a nametag because there is already a file on the son of a bitches.