Been a couple of years for me. Not stomach so much as knees. Plan to go later this year, though.
Gun Control is Completely Useless.
- Thread starter Colpy
- Start date
I have always hunted where hunting is a privilege, not a right and is important because it can be used as management of animal populations. What that means is it can control the number of animals living in an area so they don't overgraze or outgrow their food
source.
And most importantly I make full use of the animal. kings and queens do not eat better.
source.
And most importantly I make full use of the animal. kings and queens do not eat better.
No, we would rather you post a pic of your personal weapon.
Note the JFK magic bullet corner turn in the barrel...for you lazy hunters.
{from the link
"The guns are up for sale to Canadian allies or approved buyers within the defence industry"
Yeah, them sauds could use these to take out some more Yemenie weddings and schools.
Last edited:
Eerie-looking mask, rope and weapons found by Prince Albert police
Now if the hug a thug court system actually put these away there is a start of getting illegal firearms and abusers off the street
Note: 2 machetes listed as weapons how can that be eh CC?
Now if the hug a thug court system actually put these away there is a start of getting illegal firearms and abusers off the street
Note: 2 machetes listed as weapons how can that be eh CC?
Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police:
From their Position Paper on Gun Control Laws (1976):
The CACP indicates that “. . . It must not be forgotten that violent crime is also committed with stilletos [sic], butcher knives, chains, hammers, and lead pipes to name but a few other instruments . . . It is noteworthy that in the . . . categories which cover the gamut of crime identified with violence and firearms, fundamentally these crimes could have been committed as easily without firearms . . . It is essential to note that in any of these categories those dedicated to the perpetration of crime will not or cannot submit to any law and already disregard existing legislation.” (CACP 1976: 2).
The CACP acknowledges the deterrent effect of civilian gun ownership, stating that “. . . Any restriction or control of firearms may in effect lessen the safeguards of society . . . the peaceful users of firearms would appear to out-number [sic] the criminals somewhere in the proportion of 95 to 5. Firearms used properly are found among the Police, the secret service and other law enforcement officers as well as military personnel and those involved in commercial security and probably the largest group may be found among sportsman and home owners desiring increased protection . . . We will stipulate that alarms and insurance go a long way in offering protection but they do not have the deterrent effect of the firearm which, in the final analysis, may not necessarily be used by its responsible owner. Its presence suffices.” (CACP 1976: 3)
The CACP rejects the notion that weapons cause crime, indicating that “. . . Inanimate objects such as pistols, knives, axes or clubs do not and cannot cause crime. They do not and they cannot supply the motive of the impulse. The causes of crime must be sought elsewhere - in greed, hatred, jealousy, and general moral depravity - and the remedy - if any there be, is more likely to be found in morals and education in improved Police methods of detection, and in the more prompt and certain imposition of punishment. This is safeguarding society.” (CACP 1976: 4). The CACP concludes that firearm registration is “. . . unrealistic and administratively unworkable,” and that the “. . . registration of firearms, serializing and licensing will not act [as] a deterrent to violence and will not necessarily identify the person perpetrating the crime."
lifted from the CSSA' reference work For Their Own Good - Firearm Control in Canada 1946-1977
From their Position Paper on Gun Control Laws (1976):
The CACP indicates that “. . . It must not be forgotten that violent crime is also committed with stilletos [sic], butcher knives, chains, hammers, and lead pipes to name but a few other instruments . . . It is noteworthy that in the . . . categories which cover the gamut of crime identified with violence and firearms, fundamentally these crimes could have been committed as easily without firearms . . . It is essential to note that in any of these categories those dedicated to the perpetration of crime will not or cannot submit to any law and already disregard existing legislation.” (CACP 1976: 2).
The CACP acknowledges the deterrent effect of civilian gun ownership, stating that “. . . Any restriction or control of firearms may in effect lessen the safeguards of society . . . the peaceful users of firearms would appear to out-number [sic] the criminals somewhere in the proportion of 95 to 5. Firearms used properly are found among the Police, the secret service and other law enforcement officers as well as military personnel and those involved in commercial security and probably the largest group may be found among sportsman and home owners desiring increased protection . . . We will stipulate that alarms and insurance go a long way in offering protection but they do not have the deterrent effect of the firearm which, in the final analysis, may not necessarily be used by its responsible owner. Its presence suffices.” (CACP 1976: 3)
The CACP rejects the notion that weapons cause crime, indicating that “. . . Inanimate objects such as pistols, knives, axes or clubs do not and cannot cause crime. They do not and they cannot supply the motive of the impulse. The causes of crime must be sought elsewhere - in greed, hatred, jealousy, and general moral depravity - and the remedy - if any there be, is more likely to be found in morals and education in improved Police methods of detection, and in the more prompt and certain imposition of punishment. This is safeguarding society.” (CACP 1976: 4). The CACP concludes that firearm registration is “. . . unrealistic and administratively unworkable,” and that the “. . . registration of firearms, serializing and licensing will not act [as] a deterrent to violence and will not necessarily identify the person perpetrating the crime."
lifted from the CSSA' reference work For Their Own Good - Firearm Control in Canada 1946-1977
You weren't quoting them when they wanted the long gun registry
They were just assholes them
So you have no actual argument...you are just typing to watch yourself type.
Sorry, but reality makes you look stupid.
Kennesaw, Georgia Violent Crime Rate Tiny Thanks to This Gun Law
The bill passed in 1982, and ever since, the small city has built a solid reputation for itself — these are people you don’t want to mess with, and homes you do not want to break into.
Now, the entire city has had one single murder in the past six years, and the violent crime rate is less than two percent, according to the Independent Journal Review.
According to the Neighborhood Scout, the national average for the violent crime is four percent.
http://concealednation.org/2018/04/kennesaw-georgia-violent-crime-rate-tiny-thanks-to-this-gun-law/
Now, STFU dipstick. We all know what a Bullsh!t dolt you actually are.
Sorry, but reality makes you look stupid.
Kennesaw, Georgia Violent Crime Rate Tiny Thanks to This Gun Law
The bill passed in 1982, and ever since, the small city has built a solid reputation for itself — these are people you don’t want to mess with, and homes you do not want to break into.
Now, the entire city has had one single murder in the past six years, and the violent crime rate is less than two percent, according to the Independent Journal Review.
According to the Neighborhood Scout, the national average for the violent crime is four percent.
http://concealednation.org/2018/04/kennesaw-georgia-violent-crime-rate-tiny-thanks-to-this-gun-law/
Now, STFU dipstick. We all know what a Bullsh!t dolt you actually are.
Last edited:
Yep. That's what they are. " just a collection of top level municipal bureaucrats"
But the quote demonstrates their rational attitude before they became bagmen between the corrupt Liberal gov't of Chretien and the Coalition for Gun Control (the gov't gave them money, they hired the CGC to do "research") and started taking money from the IT company getting hundreds of millions to set up, then repair the gun registration system.
THOSE guys the gun controllers loved.
OH Comrade Curious!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You are a FOOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Ghurka Kukri is not just for killing people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It is an ALL PURPOSE camp tool.....................................
that was used for cutting firewood.........................................
shaping and trimming tent poles and other items...............................
and in an emergency could be used as a digging implement as well!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If you actually wanted to LEARN SOMETHING.................
instead of just pontificating..............................
like a pointy headed doofus........................
you could read the old book called.......................
"Bugles and a Tiger" .....................................
a biography of the life of a British officer.......................
in a Ghurka Regiment based on the Afghan border...............
in the 1930`s!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!