We can quibble about "significant" afterward, but I will agree to let you go loonie on the firearms act.
Deal?
Deal?

We can quibble about "significant" afterward, but I will agree to let you go loonie on the firearms act.
Deal?
![]()
I will agree to that deal on the condition that we can bring back the registry if we can show, without a shadow of a doubt, that your freedom causes a significant amount of damage to our well being.
please read about the Oaks test. It lays out some guidelines on when and how a freedom should be restricted. In short, it is never as "IF, Then" as you made it sound.
please read about the Oaks test. It lays out some guidelines on when and how a freedom should be restricted. In short, it is never as "IF, Then" as you made it sound.
Which Charter right has been violated by the Firearms Act? You have to establish that a clause in the Charter has been violated before you can apply Oakes test.
thats an outdated question, the firearms act can now be repealed by the same mechanism that it was put into place....a majority government.![]()
Tonington, all anti-gun nuts are anti-rights because they seek to only remove Private ownership of guns. They have no problem with police, military, and in a twisted way - criminals.
What evidence has the Gov given that it will abolish anything?Am I jumping the "gun" in believing the Registry is going to be gone before the end of the first session of the 41st parliament?
Now that the Long Gun Registry is to be abolished willl that mean all records kept to the time of abolishment will be expunged?
Will it mean Firearm Aquistion Permits are no longer required? If so are all those records going to be expunged?
Will the Firearm Act be repealled or watered down?
What evidence has the Gov given that it will abolish anything?