It says the right shall not be infringed, dumbass.
That's not limiting language, dipshit.
I answered your question. Do you have the balls to answer mine?
What. . . law. . . school. . . did. . . you. . . graduate. . . from?
It says the right shall not be infringed, dumbass.
Law school?what part of the right shall not be infringed do you not understand, dumbass? It is a pretty simple statement. get over it.
District of Columbia v. HellerLaw school?
And 49% of law school students are below average .a law school is where lawyers go to learn to be lawyers
So no dentists then huh?a law school is where lawyers go to learn to be lawyers
Yeah. Unlike you, I've read Heller. And its predecessor cases.District of Columbia v. Heller
In District of Columbia v. Heller 2008, the Supreme Court affirmed for the first time that the right belongs to individuals, for self-defense in the home, while also including, as dicta, that the right is not unlimited and does not preclude the existence of certain long-standing prohibitions such as those forbidding "the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill" or restrictions on "the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons."
Yeah. Unlike you, I've read Heller. And its predecessor cases.
None of which answers my question to Bondo. I wonder if he'll have the balls to answer. I doubt it.
I don't understand why you won't answer the question. But I never really did get the kind of petty cowardice you're showing.The ball is in your court. i asked you what part you didnt understand.
I don't think there is a right to "sell" arms!
"Well, that's the news from Lake Wobegon, where all the women are strong, all the men are good-looking, and all the children are above average."I suppose in a good school none of the students would be below average