Gun Control is Completely Useless.

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
clearly you are too dumb to tell the difference between a rapist and a victim. I recommend that you do not waste another moment trying to figure it out.
I recommend you take your Colpy Jr act on the road.

This is his thread. Start your own.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,505
8,108
113
B.C.
The anti-right motive is with the victims. It seems they are all linking up and voicing their displeasure of the possibility of dying before finishing school and they are not going to go away. They want the right to live. Further, many of those who are most vocal at the moment, will be voting in the 2020 election.

Reasonable gun control laws do make difference i.e., Canada, Australia, England,are a few examples. The ridiculous arguments about saving women from rapists, and the occasional store owner from a robbery do not do much to offset the rights to life of women shot by their husbands, boyfriends.

Please enlighten us on how the US gun culture is in any way healthy or responsible??
More shooting and killing in the lower mainland this week . Must be those misunderstood Americans .
 

JamesBondo

House Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,158
37
48
oh look two link about nothing that prove woman who get raped at gun point could have shot their way out of it.

Because that's the society we all envision.

200,000 women that didnt need to shoot their way out of it. here let me post the quote for you:
*As many as 200,000 women use a gun every year to defend themselves against sexual abuse.
 

JamesBondo

House Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,158
37
48
__________________________
Twit List
Angstrom avro24 Cannuck captain morgan Danbones EagleSmack highsticky Hoof Hearted Murphy petros spilledthebeer Torch light
Check / Uncheck All

reminds me of a saying: when everyone around you is a twit, maybe it is you that is the twit.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Sooooooooo........you are for some sort of gun control.....yes?

Ahem.....the constitution has been misread to support a very wealthy industry.

Sort of like the industrial military complex.....jaaaaabs!

Having said that, I'm not in favour of banning guns......just banning some from having them.

Btw, your avatar.....man are you looking rough.....I'd hate to face you in a bar fight.....lol!

........or face you on trivia night.

In Canada, we have a very limited right to own and keep firearms.

I support background checks, training, and subsequent licensing.

In other words, I support some control of who legally gets to keep arms.

Beyond that, it is all a waste of time and money, intended only to harass politically incorrect gun owners.

In the USA, this is somewhat more problematic, as their constitutional right is very clear. No problem with a background check. But that is about all that can be legitimately done.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
In Canada, we have a very limited right to own and keep firearms.

I support background checks, training, and subsequent licensing.

In other words, I support some control of who legally gets to keep arms.

Beyond that, it is all a waste of time and money, intended only to harass politically incorrect gun owners.

In the USA, this is somewhat more problematic, as their constitutional right is very clear. No problem with a background check. But that is about all that can be legitimately done.
is that what shooting up a school is?

politically incorrect?
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
Do you REALLY have to talk like a moron every single time?

There are 100 million plus gun owners in the USA.

How many have shot up schools?
but we want laws to help prevent schools from getting shot up.

it is not intended only to harass politically incorrect gun owners.

why would you even suggest it was?

are you just stupid?
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
In Canada, we have a very limited right to own and keep firearms.

I support background checks, training, and subsequent licensing.

In other words, I support some control of who legally gets to keep arms.

Beyond that, it is all a waste of time and money, intended only to harass politically incorrect gun owners.

In the USA, this is somewhat more problematic, as their constitutional right is very clear. No problem with a background check. But that is about all that can be legitimately done.

Exactly and beyond that I would say between the time of application and the day the license is granted there should be a 30 day waiting period and where there is ANY doubt whatever perhaps the application could be published in the newspaper.
 

JamesBondo

House Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,158
37
48
but we want laws to help prevent schools from getting shot up.

it is not intended only to harass politically incorrect gun owners.

why would you even suggest it was?

are you just stupid?

you remind me of the journalist that asked a panel of experts "how are we going to prevent terrorists from getting firearms, if we don't do background checks?"

there was a long moment of awkward silence then the journalist rephrased her question.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
Do you REALLY have to talk like a moron every single time?

There are 100 million plus gun owners in the USA.

How many have shot up schools?

Too many ...far too many and mostly, they are kids. Nobody is vetting them.