Nope I wouldn't. Did you not notice where I said I worked??You most definitely do not see both sides.
If this was a discussion about warfarin, you would be calling it a pesticide that is designed specifically to kill rodents.
And, by doing so, you would be offending all people that use warfarin to prevent heart attack, stroke, and blood clots in veins.
I didn't. But you did. How can an intelligent, open minded person not come up with a basic calculation like 31,000/365 days=84.9 ( ie about 80 guns)? You are not here for a logical, intelligent discussion, are you?
Please I gave you the amount of the population. I gave you the amount of people killed a DAY. 318,881,991 and 3.5 fatalities a day. It amounts to 31,881 people dead in a year. To claim all those people were killed by 80 guns is ludicrous. Besides who cares about how many guns it takes to kill 31,000 plus people. It is the people that matter not the bloody guns.
By your calculation the 80 guns were per DAY which put the guns used at 29,800 a year. Try again divide the population by 100,000 and then multiple that by 3.5 and it comes out a gun per fatality ergo 31,881. Maybe you could shave a bit off with mass shootings, but no way do 80 guns come close.
No wonder you don't understand the ratio of guns to killing of people, your math leaves a lot to be desired, in fact it is lousy.