Nah, I just wait for you to come in and provide the buffoonery. Why double up on it?
How so? By pointing out a ridiculous and asinine claim?
One that you let slip right by because?
Nah, I just wait for you to come in and provide the buffoonery. Why double up on it?
Because I get really tired of arguing every stupid claim. The other day I did the heavy lifting on pointing out Grievous's many errors on health care. Your turn.How so? By pointing out a ridiculous and asinine claim?
One that you let slip right by because?
I bet more children die in the US from guns than from auto accidents. So maybe, having one's privacy invaded legally every so often is not such a high price to pay.
.
Here are some facts......take note...from lawyers no less :lol:Oh really?
I don't suppose you'd have any of those things called "facts" to back up such and idiotic statement?
Based on asinine statements?
Because I get really tired of arguing every stupid claim. The other day I did the heavy lifting on pointing out Grievous's many errors on health care. Your turn.
What is more I bet more children die in the US from guns than from auto accidents.
I am a gun rights people, you idiot. I just don't like stupid. And I like it even less when it's on my side. I expect the other side to be stupid.Well there is not much heavy lifting here. It was a slam dunk.
I tend to think though you let slip because you find way too much pleasure in going after the Gun Rights people that you are willing to overlook stupidity.
I am a gun rights people, you idiot. I just don't like stupid. And I like it even less when it's on my side. I expect the other side to be stupid.
Oh my!! Are you really trying to make us believe that stats can NOT be skewed to produce whatever results the client wishes?? No one is that naïve surely!! Does it not make sense that the more weapons in circulation the higher the gun violence will be?? Just spend six months in Florida or Texas and you will find the deaths by guns bear no relationship to the stats that are registered. Now as far as I know, neither of those states have recently had multiple school, university or mall killings to put their stats up. It is just business as usual. Get real man!!Oh really?
I don't suppose you'd have any of those things called "facts" to back up such and idiotic statement?
Based on asinine statements?
So, your basic position is "I'm right no matter what the facts say?"Oh my!! Are you really trying to make us believe that stats can NOT be skewed to produce whatever results the client wishes?? No one is that naïve surely!! Does it not make sense that the more weapons in circulation the higher the gun violence will be?? Just spend six months in Florida or Texas and you will find the deaths by guns bear no relationship to the stats that are registered. Now as far as I know, neither of those states have recently had multiple school, university or mall killings to put their stats up. It is just business as usual. Get real man!!
This is the sort of argument I despise as idiocy. It is obvious that clueless teenagers have no idea as to the proper handling of a gun nor what the ramifications of firing such a gun would be. It is a proven fact that young people do not develop the sense of consequence of actions until much later than first thought. So by allowing availability of guns without strict rules, governments encourage lawlessness and death of innocents, sometimes just for disagreeing with an undeveloped personality..
What makes you think the person in the cartoon is a teenager?This is the sort of argument I despise as idiocy. It is obvious that clueless teenagers have no idea as to the proper handling of a gun nor what the ramifications of firing such a gun would be. It is a proven fact that young people do not develop the sense of consequence of actions until much later than first thought. So by allowing availability of guns without strict rules, governments encourage lawlessness and death of innocents, sometimes just for disagreeing with an undeveloped personality..
If that gun had not been so readily available the victim would probably have had a better chance of survival, thereby preventing a death sentence for two. So, rather than the gun being at fault it is the LAWS regarding distribution of weapon that needs attention n..
Guess you didn't read this Birdie?See link below.....
Here are some facts......take note...from lawyers no less :lol:
Which Do You Think is More Dangerous for a Child- a Gun or Swimming Pool? - Jackson & Wilson
Do you know many adults that wear their hats backwards, have pants so low they look loaded while using their spare hand to hold up those same pants??. Add that "Huh" look on the face, and the whole cartoon does not exactly portray a responsible adult. Or does that cartoon resemble the adults in your world??What makes you think the person in the cartoon is a teenager?
No, I didn't and I will give you my reasons. I know swimming pools are dangerous as I have had one since l967. Just like the rules gun owners should be subjected to, my pool is not used without me being present. It is fenced and no child can get in. I taught my children and grandchildren to swim very young and even then they were not allowed to swim without a watchful adult present. I live alone now, but my new pool is fenced and cannot be seen unless I deliberately show it to someone.Guess you didn't read this Birdie?
Can't be true, it doesn't fit with you preconceived notions...
And there are safety rules for firearm, but the criminal element will not follow them, even cops sometimes don't follow them...
Cop Shoots Self in Foot - YouTube
Plenty of them here in DC. Lots of people in their 20s, even a few in their 30s dress that way. As far as the "duh" look, I see that on people of all ages.Do you know many adults that wear their hats backwards, have pants so low they look loaded while using their spare hand to hold up those same pants??. Add that "Huh" look on the face, and the whole cartoon does not exactly portray a responsible adult. Or does that cartoon resemble the adults in your world??
The gun stats mostly come from the FBI, which if they slanted the stats at all would overstate gun deaths. They're very pro-gun control, as are most police agencies.As to stats......unless one looks very closely at the parameters of any study, money talks. If gun stats come from a health department which collects from doctors, hospitals, police departments and clinics they will be very different from those collected by a rifle association.