Global Warming: still the ‘Greatest Scam in History’
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
He dosn't seem to know the parts of a watery planet like ours.
Too many spheres under the toroid.
Makes my head dizzy just trying to think about it all working at the same time and Waldo seems blissfully unaware of the complexity. They picked a real loser in CO2 just because of the oil connection, that's the science of money, not physics.
Makes my head dizzy just trying to think about it all working at the same time and Waldo seems blissfully unaware of the complexity. They picked a real loser in CO2 just because of the oil connection, that's the science of money, not physics.
As long as it keeps donations rolling in from the gullible, who cares? It has never been about saving the earth, just money for their little protests and meetings in various trendy spots.
you know Walter... you continue to outright ignore all the graphs showing you warming. It's truly a most bizarre position for anyone, like you, to take... that it isn't warming. Of course, legitimate skeptics accept its warming... some of those even accept a principal attribution of that warming to anthropogenic sourced CO2. The only real openly accepted debate is around just how sensitive the climate is... just how much warming can we expect based on an assortment of mitigation scenarios and the influences of short and longer-term feedbacks. Even your OP reference, Uncle Roy, doesn't dispute it's warming... wassup with you!
now, I had a glance at the linked graphics (that the most obliging member petros actually chose to provide from your original link)... one could go through everyone of them and easily punt them... but it wouldn't make a damn bit of difference to the likes of you. You're steadfast in your denial and you're quite comfortable simply doing your C&P from where ever... job well done on this Walter... or did you bother to read to the end of your article and catch the author: Paul Mykolajtchuk is from Northern New Jersey. He is currently a hopeful aspiring meteorologist in high school. Paul is very interested in climate and weather trends across the globe. :mrgreen:
Makes my head dizzy just trying to think about it all working at the same time and Waldo seems blissfully unaware of the complexity. They picked a real loser in CO2 just because of the oil connection, that's the science of money, not physics.
beav, beav... anytime you'd like to swim out of your den and take a shot at debunking CO2 as the principal causal tie to warming, please do... please do! Surely some of your fellow thunderdolts have paved the path for you... yes?
Steve Goddard @SteveSGoddard Everyone exposed to CO2 eventually dies. Correlation is 100% The time for dawdling is over. #climatechange #AGU14 #COP20
Warming is the cause of CO2. It's good verifyable science. You debunked yourself Waldo. next! move along sonny yer in the way
Warming is the cause of CO2. It's good verifyable science. You debunked yourself Waldo. next! move along sonny yer in the way
Hey now. That boy has never heard of dielectric /Joule heating in the upper atmosphere.
1962AuJPh..15..223C Page 223
Just one of millions of miseducated citizens. An obvious victim of con artists, adamently clinging to their dignity by their fingernails. It's alright to be wildly wrong Waldo. It's part of growing up. See yer mum, she,ll gee yea a ug lad.
AWG been squished so many times now it's a pulverized horse.
What always amazes me about these old papers, is the reason they were burried. Electricity has been off limits for some science for a long time.
AWG been squished so many times now it's a pulverized horse.
What always amazes me about these old papers, is the reason they were burried. Electricity has been off limits for some science for a long time.
Walter! Those weren't YOUR graphs... those were the graphs your intrepid high school wannabe meteorologist slapped together! Hey Walter, why don't you step out from your cozy isolation and actually try to explain a single one of those graphs... explain and support a single one of those graphs! Sure you can!
but ya Walter, I really like some of your graphs... particularly the one's that blow up on ya... blow up on ya real good! I do appreciate why you're just a tad hesitant to put yourself out there, hey! :mrgreen: The following recent effort of yours was classic! Keep up your floundering work Walter!
Temperature is getting lower.
:lol: see Walter, that's what happens when you try something and you haven't a freakin' clue what you're doing! Here, try another slice and a global view:
Since you provide not other evidence to show how the graphs are inaccurate they obviously must have veracity.
says they guy, you, who simply linked to an article put together by a high-school teenager... yes, clearly, your source has "veracity"! I asked you to take any of those related graphs and try to make a case for, as you say, "it's veracity". You can't... you have no understanding in anything subject matter related. All you can do is blindly C&P without adding any of your own commentary or interpretation of what you're linking to. Oh sorry, you can do more than that... you can repeatedly throw your reddies against posts that so infuriate you, that so trump your nonsense, that so showcase you haven't a clue about anything! You sir, you are a poster-boy for deniers!
Locutus!!! You've clearly found your groove! :mrgreen:
The above post goes to explain why this place is like it is.
Here is harpp and chem-trails in a simple to understand presentation.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRPh0rPQWpY&list=WL&index=3
Here is harpp and chem-trails in a simple to understand presentation.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRPh0rPQWpY&list=WL&index=3
Just one of millions of miseducated citizens. An obvious victim of con artists, adamently clinging to their dignity by their fingernails. It's alright to be wildly wrong Waldo. It's part of growing up. See yer mum, she,ll gee yea a ug lad.
AWG been squished so many times now it's a pulverized horse.
What always amazes me about these old papers, is the reason they were burried. Electricity has been off limits for some science for a long time.
So what has changed with joule heating in the last hundred and fifty years or so, assuming the temperature record is correct and the average global temperature has gone up the better part of 1 deg C? Is is the shifting magnetic pole that has changed the reactions in the ionosphere, and if so how have these changes caused higher temperatures. Can the shifting of the poles be correlated with the temperature record? And if so, how can we show that the poles shifting is a cause, rather than an effect of global warming (there are some theories out there that cahnges in ice, particualrly the melting ogf the Greenland ice cap, may be causing the pole to shift.