Global Warming: still the ‘Greatest Scam in History’
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
just that... or the originals? :lol:
here's a thought moderator. Now take this respectively... I think I still have some noob latitude. I thought I'd play along and do a 1:1 repeat of member petrocd's drywall obsession to simply reinforce the nonsense. A teat-for-tat... 1 for 1. Of course, it looks like it only managed to feed the guys OCD... and... bring along following stooges to ply their best googly drywall finds! Where I'm confused, what I'm asking, what I'm unsure about... is in relation to your post I'm quoting (and others of yours preceding; those that seemed to encourage the drywallPalooza). I'm just not clear on the boundaries... on the moderating limits... on just how devolved a thread is allowed to reach before a moderator will attempt to set things on course again? Now, I understand the concept of self-moderation, I've been on boards where this has worked well... but.....
are you "Nobody"? Is this you speaking... or is this your described behavioral wifey offering you guidance?
do you think your marginalization ploy is working? Do you think "everyone" just ignores your OCD... and says, ah nothing to see here... that's just petrocd being himself!
ftfy
CU - time for church!
am I... here? So... I post on multiple boards; and you... you don't partake in more than a single board, this board? Perhaps that's why you lack perspective on how other boards function, particularly in regards the self-moderation aspect I mentioned.
you're deep!
now... before all the purposeful derailing of this thread, I responded, with the following, to member Colpy who had put together a series of links, presumably, to help him make a case for the legitimacy of the so-called "pause"... should we see if this gets responded to, or again, purposely buried pages deep:
lets recap:
- you're purposely focusing on surface temperature... you're isolating warming to exclude the >90% of the globe where most warming goes... the oceans/ocean heat content.
- you're purposely focusing on a cherry-picked starting date for a temperature trend; again, you're starting at one of the most significant ENSO events of recorded history.
- you're ignoring (well, rather... I doubt you know about) recent research/publications that have more accurately accounted for sparse station data in the world's most isolated (and coincidentally most warming) parts of the world; e.g. the Arctic. Here's an article that describes an early revision of this study theme... the study (and subsequent updates to it) stand, as I'm aware, with no formal refutation having usurped them. Global warming since 1997 more than twice as fast as previously estimated
- notwithstanding 2014 is expected to take over as the warmest year on record, you're making your claim while somehow ignoring that the warmest years on record have all been in the relatively recent years. The 'Top 10' warmest years on record:
- you're purposely focusing on a cherry-picked starting date for a temperature trend; again, you're starting at one of the most significant ENSO events of recorded history.
- you're ignoring (well, rather... I doubt you know about) recent research/publications that have more accurately accounted for sparse station data in the world's most isolated (and coincidentally most warming) parts of the world; e.g. the Arctic. Here's an article that describes an early revision of this study theme... the study (and subsequent updates to it) stand, as I'm aware, with no formal refutation having usurped them. Global warming since 1997 more than twice as fast as previously estimated
- notwithstanding 2014 is expected to take over as the warmest year on record, you're making your claim while somehow ignoring that the warmest years on record have all been in the relatively recent years. The 'Top 10' warmest years on record:
=> 2010, 2005, 1998, 2013, 2003, 2002, 2006, 2009, 2007, 2004, 2012
- just for funzies, let's have a look at some heightened cherry-picking... like you're engaged in!
The Lethal Dose that kills 50% of the test subjects.
This one is a bit crazier. More difficult to have meaningful conversations, but entertaining, like listen to the callers on a Glenn Beck show.
You watch Glen Beck? Suddenly you have a condition instead of a position.
I don't even think he's on TV anymore.
There you go....See how wrong you can be..? this ain't my first rodeo..
I've posted on other board, even been moderator and co-admin on a few...but you see, I'm not a single interest one trick pony,
My interests vary, from music to geocaching...
Lately I've concentrated on this one board because I'm focused on digitizing and editing the videos I've compiled over the years, and also videos that other people have made...
Once in a while I switch to the forum to watch you make a fool of yourself....some people are mule headed but man....you take the cake...
I await your standard condescending response with bated breath:roll:
Half the dose of what it takes to kill.
10g - 13.2g/kg of drywall to kill a drywaller. Cellulose(LD50 5gr/kg) will kill before potassium sulphate or starch (both LD50 6.6gr/kg).
