JunkScience.com @JunkScience NYTimes @JustinHGillis tries to INVENT a scientific origin for 2C temp target. http://goo.gl/ld3a98
REALITY: http://goo.gl/GJtJ5G
Global Warming: still the ‘Greatest Scam in History’
- Thread starter Walter
- Start date
JunkScience.com @JunkScience NYTimes @JustinHGillis tries to INVENT a scientific origin for 2C temp target. http://goo.gl/ld3a98
REALITY: http://goo.gl/GJtJ5G
you sure seem to be fixated on or even resenting our good friend Petros.
is it because he's a highly educated man communicating beyond your level, above your pay grade and you're a...well, you're not doing any of that.
don't be so jelly wilbo. you should probably talk to a therapists and get it all out. :lol:
Still no refutation, unless of course ad hominem is your refutation. If it is, you win.
says the guy, you, who helped perpetuate the petros drywall OCD! :mrgreen: I'm certainly not fixated on member petros... what I will continue to point out is his glaring want to throw his grab-bag of alternate theories forward but his absolute unwillingness to provide any semblance of a formal statement/claim about those, and his absolute refusal to provide correlation between them and/or how they formally compare/challenge the prevailing scientific consensus. Just because you're enamored with the petros shtick, just because you're so taken with his dropping of blind links without comment/interpretation, just because you revel in his purposeful vagueness, just because you accept he won't support a damn thing he presumes to claim (whatever the hell it is)... I sir, I will not follow your blind allegiance to the petros charade. You're welcome.
again, you don't know what an ad hom is. Your game is to throw out any shyte you find... you have yet to support a thing you've ever linked to. You simply think that your C&P wizardry from denier blogs means you've actually provided insight/knowledge. You're nothing but a poser, with reddies at hand; one who couldn't discuss/argue any of the underlying/related science. I challenged you to take one of those graphs you took from your "high-school teenager", and actually explain it/interpret it... and support what it presumes to portray. Your mega distracting and deflecting from that challenge is so telling Walter, so telling.
you're repeating your bits again. it's like a nervous tic. I'm serious lad, you should seek help for your frustration and resentment before you stroke out. we'd hate for anything to happen to you.
what argument have you ever presented? Your C&P from a high-school teenager is not you making an argument! Whaaa!
I am impervious to your continued marginalization attempts. Go check your denier twitter feeds! Chop, chop!
Damn strange isn't it? They all refuse to start at the sun. This more than anything else indicates their desperation to keep the issue grounded on anthropocentric origin. No matter wheather the temperature goes up down or sideways the first thing that come to mind is the sun, the engine driving the planets.
Self hateing humans or eugenics supporters?
Watts Up With That @wattsupwiththat Mann, Cook, Nuccitelli get put off-site for their presentations at #AGU14 see: http://wp.me/p7y4l-vg8
Some first impressions from #AGU14
Anthony Watts / 3 hours ago December 16, 2014
Mann, Cook, Nuccitelli get put off-site for their presentations
I spent Monday looking around at the sights on the opening day of AGU 2014. Before I get to that I want to give some thanks to some people. First of all I want to give thanks to my readers for their gracious assistance in getting me here via help with expenses, secondly I’d like to thank Joan Buhrman and Peter Weiss of AGU for their assistance in getting me set up with media passes and hearing assistance. They have been quite gracious.
That said, here are some of my first impressions of the conference. Number one it’s very large; thousands of people milling about going to different sessions and breakouts and halls it can be quite overwhelming just simply getting from point A to point B due to the volume of people. Along way I did spot some things of interest and I’ve taken some photographs which I’ll share below.
One thing that did strike me as different this year was this seems to be less emphasis on climate alarmism than their wares in years past. I’ve noted there’s less advertising for things like this session last year….
….in fact it seems to have been muted a bit….no mention of “attacks”:
….and there doesn’t seem to be any special session with the usual suspects on being “attacked” like last year:
Perhaps my report on it last year had something to do with it, once people saw how ridiculous and egomaniacal the entire session was. But then again, there was this item from Dr. Mann this year: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/12/14/hilarious-irony-michael-mann-to-give-lecture-on-professional-ethics-for-climate-scientists/ so I’m not completely convinced that AGU has dialed back, but there are encouraging signs.
For example, the whole John Cook/Dana Nuccitell Skeptical science social media attack dog universe seems to have been moved off-site to the Marriot Marquis hotel rather than be in the main buildings at Moscone Center:
more
Some first impressions from #AGU14 | Watts Up With That?
That's not an adequate response. It's why I suspect that the whole shifting pole business is more an attempt to shift blame, than a workable theory, because as soon as the questions get technical, the answers get vague.
Damn strange isn't it? They all refuse to start at the sun. This more than anything else indicates their desperation to keep the issue grounded on anthropocentric origin. No matter wheather the temperature goes up down or sideways the first thing that come to mind is the sun, the engine driving the planets.
Self hateing humans or eugenics supporters?
Neither self-hating nor a eugenics supporter. Just a scientist. I need an internally consistent theory that accords with observation to start with.