The problem for Zimmerman is the 911 operator told him not to follow Martin
Zimmerman was armed and once you go in pursuit the self defence verdict is
in trouble.
Personally, if someone like Zimmerman came at me on the street I would fight
him too. In fact if anyone came at me on the street I would fight assuming this
person was attacking, accusing or attempting to hold me for whatever reason.
I am not young anymore but I once operated nightclubs and bars and I would
do as much damage as possible if attacked.
In Martin's case I think he was a seventeen year old kid and he fought back
Zimmerman should not have followed him for any reason and the comments
made were documented by 911. This isn't about whether you like Zimmerman
or Martin its about the law and self defence is out the window if you go in pursuit.
The real serious reason for trying to make this go away is the fact the gated
community hired this guy and he was armed. If he is found guilty, the civil suit
to follow won't be against Zimmerman alone but the gated community and it will
be in the multi millions. Its going to be interesting.
You need to listen to the tapes:
George Zimmerman 911 call about Trayvon Martin UnRedacted - YouTube
And to understand the following:
1. A dispatcher's instructions have no authority.
2. Even if they had authority "We don't need you to do that" hardly ranks as an order.
3. Even if it were an order, with legal authority, Zimmerman answers "OK". and there is no sign of shortness of breath in the continuing conversation to indicate GZ is still following Martin.
4. Even if Zimmerman WERE following Martin, following someone is NOT illegal...........GZ was behaving in a lawful manner.
5. Even if GZ confronted Martin and asked him what he was doing, that is still completely legal, GZ would still have been acting in a completely lawful manner.