I see a lot of 'should have' or 'choice' mentioned in a lot of 'what if' scenarios, but tell me how, functionally, an individual or group of individuals can actually exist outside of society but within society. There will inevitably be conflict. Do we allow for everyone to pick which laws and rules to follow? Say some douchebag doesn't want to follow the law against rape, should he have the legitimate choice to do so? Or is it only selective laws one should not be allowed to follow? Who chooses those laws? What if we disagree on which laws should be allowed to be chosen?
It has to be an all or nothing game otherwise it is not equitable. It may at times seem or even be unfair on an individual basis, but it is always equitable.