Gez, isn't that what the Harper government did - raise the age to 67? Trudeau said he was going to reverse that. It only makes sense since people are living and working longer. It will benefit them in the long run by increasing what they will receive when they do retire.
JMHO
Oh, someone already mentioned it - sorry - my bad LOL
The article states that the Liberals are looking at "clawing back" benefits "again". The definition of "claw back" is not relevant here. It means not collecting until you reach 67. Clawing back means re-paying something that you received so the last sentence is simply not accurate.
JMHO
JMHO
Gez, isn't that what the Harper government did - raise the age to 67? Trudeau said he was going to reverse that. It only makes sense since people are living and working longer. It will benefit them in the long run by increasing what they will receive when they do retire.
JMHO
Oh, someone already mentioned it - sorry - my bad LOL
The article states that the Liberals are looking at "clawing back" benefits "again". The definition of "claw back" is not relevant here. It means not collecting until you reach 67. Clawing back means re-paying something that you received so the last sentence is simply not accurate.
JMHO