Fat Kids

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
Never thought about that, but it makes some sense, JLM. No question the fast food joints will take a hit. Do you think it's possible that Gordo and company are ramming the HST through for our own good? :lol::lol::lol:

I'm thinking that Gordo will be doing some fine tuning here for his own good.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
I go into McDonalds once every 5 years or so, can't remember why, but even I, (and I'm not 6), wouldn't go
in there for the salad, I would at least have a big mac,
(do they still have them?), and that would tell me why
I only go in there every 5 years.

How patriotic of you...............:lol::lol::lol:
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
If it weren't for that evil beef in their burgers, I'd likely go in there once every 5 years too. However, having been in big meat packing joints too many times, I can't stomach the thought of eating a "manure burger" in a fast food restaurant. I could handle the sesame seed bun, and a pickle and mustard, but the "beef?" No way - I know where it comes from! Besides, why bother with the salad? You could thrown together some lettuce and a few slivers of veggies at home for around 1/7th the cost and end up with a better one anyway.

Is it the friendly service that attracts people? Maybe the quiet, relaxing atmosphere, conducive to good digestion? The fine china and cutlery? Or is it just the plush, comfy furniture? I'm stumped. :lol:

For my daughter and I, it was the playroom, as we could sit
and drink our coffee and have a good chat, while my grandson
was flinging himself about in the playroom, and not sitting
beside his mom saying "mom, I want to go, it's boring here",
another ploy by the company, which brings many families in.
 

countryboy

Traditionally Progressive
Nov 30, 2009
3,686
39
48
BC
For my daughter and I, it was the playroom, as we could sit
and drink our coffee and have a good chat, while my grandson
was flinging himself about in the playroom, and not sitting
beside his mom saying "mom, I want to go, it's boring here",
another ploy by the company, which brings many families in.

Right! I forgot about the playroom as I'm "between" young daughters and grandchildren...you know, that "awkward" age! And that must explain why I don't go to McDs. At least you have a reason, and it sounds reasonable to me...I'd likely do the same thing (but I still wouldn't eat the beef!) :lol::lol:
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
Right! I forgot about the playroom as I'm "between" young daughters and grandchildren...you know, that "awkward" age! And that must explain why I don't go to McDs. At least you have a reason, and it sounds reasonable to me...I'd likely do the same thing (but I still wouldn't eat the beef!) :lol::lol:

I'll never eat that beef again, haven't had one of those
big macs for about 5 years, but I have to admit that once
every 6 months or so we visit burger king,(nice playroom), and have a whopper, (very light on the sauce, just a hint of the flavour), and I like the taste of them, they are char
broiled, which gives them that barbecued flavour, but even
then, once I've had my fill, I don't want to see another
one for months.
 

VanIsle

Always thinking
Nov 12, 2008
7,046
43
48
Don’t’ you drink eggnog then? Eggnog contains raw eggs.
Not anymore. I started wondering a few years ago why even Egg Nog that claimed it was the "Original" still tasted like it was diet crap. I don't drink Egg Nog often but if I am going to have any, I want the real thing. A couple of weeks ago, I was glancing at the newspaper and noticed a recipe for homemade Egg Nog. I had been thinking about making my own this year so I was drawn to the recipe. It mentioned that it was for people who do not like their Egg Nog with raw eggs. I then realized that the yolks were missing in the store version and that was the reason why it tasted so bland and so watered down.
What a fantastic recipe it turned out to be. Easy to make with cooked eggs (eggs made into a bit of a custard first) added to milk and cream. Not as thick and I'm sure not quite as fattening as when I bought it from the store with the raw eggs but without preservatives and no fear of raw yolks. I was amazed at how quickly it disappeared around here. It can be made a few days before Christmas but it only makes about 10 cups so next time I'll double the recipe.
 

VanIsle

Always thinking
Nov 12, 2008
7,046
43
48
I am hoping that this H.S.T. cloud as it applies to restaurants may have a silver lining in that all the junk joints like McD's and Burger King will just bite the dust and a few who offer wholesome food at a reasonable price will survive. My wife and I went out to Denny's tonight for supper (special occasion) and it didn't seem too bad, at least the price was quite reasonable.
I don't think they will take a hit at all. Places that sell liquor and give service where tips apply will take the hits. It would not surprize me at all if fast food outlets increase their business. No tip to pay, buy your booze at the liquor store and take it home along with the burgers and fries. I think it is the "middle" class restaurants that will close. People will still go out to the high end places because you expect to pay the price anyway. Wait staff will suffer when it comes to tips because no one (at least most) will pay 15% on top of the rest of the meal. That 15 - 20 % is going to drop to about 5%.
The Denny's you went to is an okay place. We used to go there often on Fridays after work. Places like that will probably survive because it is attached to a hotel chain.
 

countryboy

Traditionally Progressive
Nov 30, 2009
3,686
39
48
BC
I don't think they will take a hit at all. Places that sell liquor and give service where tips apply will take the hits. It would not surprize me at all if fast food outlets increase their business. No tip to pay, buy your booze at the liquor store and take it home along with the burgers and fries. I think it is the "middle" class restaurants that will close. People will still go out to the high end places because you expect to pay the price anyway. Wait staff will suffer when it comes to tips because no one (at least most) will pay 15% on top of the rest of the meal. That 15 - 20 % is going to drop to about 5%.
The Denny's you went to is an okay place. We used to go there often on Fridays after work. Places like that will probably survive because it is attached to a hotel chain.

I think you might be right, but I hope you're wrong. Waiters cannot afford to take a hit like that. The work is hard enough as it is (and no waiter I know is overpaid), so a hit like that would be disastrous for wait staff. That is not good.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
He's too late. His days of fine tuning are flat.

I disagree, people like him (just like old W.A.C. who nobody used to vote for but he always breezed through every election). Gordo has 31/2 years, longer than most people's memories. Even the people who like Carole James would be deathly afraid of having her for a premier.
 

countryboy

Traditionally Progressive
Nov 30, 2009
3,686
39
48
BC
I think you might be right, but I hope you're wrong. Waiters cannot afford to take a hit like that. The work is hard enough as it is (and no waiter I know is overpaid), so a hit like that would be disastrous for wait staff. That is not good.

And if fast food places become "more attractive" because of the HST, it won't do our "Fat Kids" any good at all. (Staying on topic here...) :-|
 

VanIsle

Always thinking
Nov 12, 2008
7,046
43
48
And if fast food places become "more attractive" because of the HST, it won't do our "Fat Kids" any good at all. (Staying on topic here...) :-|
Was it you who asked about reds and greens? If it was - click on settings on the top of your page and then choose control panel. When that opens up you will see who is giving you greens and sometimes you can get a red but people don't always sign their "reds".

Regarding the HST, that was actually my point but I think it's going to happen and I doubt Gordo cares. He's trying to find a way to pay for the Olympics.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
I disagree with you on a few points. Well, actually, most of them. I doubt strongly that many (if any) consumers are demanding the kinds of additives that the manufacturers are slipping into the food products. That doesn't make sense - how would the average consumer even know what they are?

I think the food industry is doing a lot of "demand creating" by trying to differentiate their products (some of which are just bastardized commodities) with some nasty little product innovations and then advertising them to be something that they are actually not. ("Healthy", for example...a big cereal company just lost one in the U.S. by doing this). The worst part of it all is that they continue to fiddle with the "recipes" by substituting different (usually cheaper) additives without disclosing this to their customers. A prime example of this is the move toward cheaper than sugar sweeteners such as high fructose corn syrup. The net result of this "sleight of hand" trick is that the customer doesn't realize that the product they might have been buying for years is now different. And they didn't "demand" it...they're not even aware of it!

I do agree that profit, no matter what the consequences, is often the motive, but I disagree that it is the customer that is driving the technological changes. Profit is a necessary thing in order for a business to survive, but I disagree with "profit at any cost." That type of short term strategy usually results in problems for the company following that path, and I think their problems are just beginning.
Yup. Companies want to develop food that grows bigger and lasts longer in transport. So they try a variety of ways to do this. They use everything from chemicals to genetic engineering. It's all about profit: getting the most money through the easiest and cheapest means. And people are just too lazy to demand the small tasty tomato over the huge tasteless tomato so these companies get away with it.

And I do think demand for better quality food products is increasing, as evidenced by the obvious move toward more organic products in the marketplace. There are other positive (healthy) activities going on, such as the "Slow Food Movement" and I think we will see more, as the public becomes more aware of what is happening to them and their "food." It's just a matter of time, and I'm hoping it will happen faster. People are not stupid...being deliberately misinformed is one thing, but the power of the consumer is big stuff and you will see just how powerful, as more of them become more accurately informed.

This entire mess was created by manufacturers trying to apply marketing principles to something that is basic to life, virtually commodities in many cases. That is a bad fit, because you are looking at almost a "pure competition" situation. In order to protect their pricing structures, they have painted themselves into a bit of a corner by cutting product costs to the bare bones (additives), playing some very suspicious advertising "games", and ending up with products that are all pretty much the same and questionable at best, on the health and nutrition side of things. The part that might do them the most harm in the long haul is the prices they are charging for this "food." Six bucks for a box of cheap additives (breakfast cereal) ain't good value and people will not react positively as the story unfolds. And unfold it will, in spite of "industrial food's" best efforts to suppress it. Once again, people simply are not stupid - other companies and industries have discovered that the hard way in the past, and this situation will be no different.
Education is the key I think.

Perhaps the most ironic part will turn out to be this: The same legal power that has allowed them to fiddle with ingredients (such as "fresh orange juice" and many different names for MSG) will be the same "power" that can be brought to bear on them when it comes time for the lawsuits...allergy problems, diabetes, obesity, whew...the list could be long.

If a woman can sue McD's because she spilled hot coffee on herself in one of their restaurants...and win, just imagine the field day(s) that will occur once the lawyers get into the really serious stuff!
We can hope. :)
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
I disagree with you on a few points. Well, actually, most of them. I doubt strongly that many (if any) consumers are demanding the kinds of additives that the manufacturers are slipping into the food products. That doesn't make sense - how would the average consumer even know what they are?

Consumers do not demand the additives. What they demand is good taste, good texture, overall good tasting product, at a moderate price. And also the product must have a long shelf life; they don’t like it if the product is spoiled 2 or 3 days after they buy it.

The only answer to this is plenty of additives, preservatives etc. So consumers are not asking for additives and preservatives. But by the demand they place on their food, they are indirectly permitting the use of additives and preservatives.


I think the food industry is doing a lot of "demand creating" by trying to differentiate their products (some of which are just bastardized commodities) with some nasty little product innovations and then advertising them to be something that they are actually not. ("Healthy", for example...a big cereal company just lost one in the U.S. by doing this).

That is all part of advertising, PR, countryboy. Word ‘healthy’ means nothing; it is not defined in government regulations somewhere. My definition of healthy maybe different from your definition of healthy. So you can hardly blame the food industry for using labels such as healthy, nutritious, etc. for their products. Unless and until governments and courts define exactly what is meant by ‘healthy’ or ‘nutritious’, it will continue.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
And I do think demand for better quality food products is increasing, as evidenced by the obvious move toward more organic products in the marketplace.

Organic food forms only a small part of the overall food industry. Since it is relatively recent, it may experience fast growth, that is the case with anything new. But eventually the demand for organic food will plateau at a much smaller value than demand for nonorganic food. The reason for that is that organic food is much more expensive than nonorganic stuff. While some people may be willing to pay more for organic food, many are not.

I don’t’ see organic food as being any threat to food industry in general. Sure it has its niche, but there is no way it will replace the food industry, it is just not cost effective.


Six bucks for a box of cheap additives (breakfast cereal) ain't good value and people will not react positively as the story unfolds. And unfold it will, in spite of "industrial food's" best efforts to suppress it. Once again, people simply are not stupid - other companies and industries have discovered that the hard way in the past, and this situation will be no different.


Really? Then why are people still paying six bucks for it, why don’t they make their own cereal? The answer is that food industry sells convenience. Making your own cereal (oatmeal, muesli or whatever) take time, and nobody has time these days. Food industry sells convenience in a package and people find that convenient.

As I said before, food industry is not ideology driven, it is profit driven. If tomorrow people want good nutrition, food without any additives and preservatives, are willing to pay more for it and they stop buying the junk that food industry puts out, why the will stop selling the junk and start selling good food.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Perhaps not a salad, but certainly apple slices and juice instead of pop.. And the toy makes a good hostage. :lol:

Of course you need not go back ..

But that is how they hook them, Francis. It starts out with apple slices, salads and then graduates to Big Mac and french fries.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
A "PS" to my long-winded response to this one...the big 3 auto makers used to take the consumer for granted some years ago too. And look at the shape they're in today. The customer found something better (not cheaper, BETTER) in the form of other cars like Toyota, Honda, etc. I suspect you will see a similar change in the food biz, but hopefully with some serious domestic competition that knows how to produce and market food wisely. Heck of an opportunity for local food producers - lots of them - to combine a growing local food movement with real customer needs and come up with...convenience foods that are good for us! It's technically possible (I make my own so surely professionals could do it better!) and potentially profitable. And healthy. Exciting times coming, I'd say...

There is a big difference between car industry and food industry, countryboy. Cars are the same all over the world; food varies from one region to another in the same country. So Japanese car manufacturers could enter the North American or European markets with relative ease.

Food is totally different in Japan and USA; it will be very difficult for a Japanese food industry to branch out into USA. How many foreign food companies do you see? On the contrary, if anything it is the Americans who are making inroads all over the world. The fast food chains such as McDonald’s, Wendy, Subway, Burger King etc. are everywhere these days.

Indeed, I did remark on this in another thread a while ago. In Britain, fish and chips used to be the native fast food. These days fish and ship shops have almost completely disappeared, to be replaced by McDonald’s, Burger King etc.

I don’t think the analogy between cars and food is appropriate.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
I am hoping that this H.S.T. cloud as it applies to restaurants may have a silver lining in that all the junk joints like McD's and Burger King will just bite the dust and a few who offer wholesome food at a reasonable price will survive. My wife and I went out to Denny's tonight for supper (special occasion) and it didn't seem too bad, at least the price was quite reasonable.

That indeed is the bottom line JLM, the price. All this talk of nutrition, additives, preservatives etc, is well and good, but at the end of the day, price is the deciding factor as to whether a restaurant stays in business or goes belly up (unless it fulfills a particular niche, then it can get away by charging high prices).

So if Denny’s can outbid McDonald’s in terms of prices, it will drive McDonald’s out of businesses. If not, it won’t, both will survive.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
That indeed is the bottom line JLM, the price. All this talk of nutrition, additives, preservatives etc, is well and good, but at the end of the day, price is the deciding factor as to whether a restaurant stays in business or goes belly up (unless it fulfills a particular niche, then it can get away by charging high prices).

So if Denny’s can outbid McDonald’s in terms of prices, it will drive McDonald’s out of businesses. If not, it won’t, both will survive.

So ... it's really not fat.... It's ulcers, huh?
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
I don't think they will take a hit at all. Places that sell liquor and give service where tips apply will take the hits. It would not surprize me at all if fast food outlets increase their business. No tip to pay, buy your booze at the liquor store and take it home along with the burgers and fries. I think it is the "middle" class restaurants that will close. People will still go out to the high end places because you expect to pay the price anyway. Wait staff will suffer when it comes to tips because no one (at least most) will pay 15% on top of the rest of the meal. That 15 - 20 % is going to drop to about 5%.
The Denny's you went to is an okay place. We used to go there often on Fridays after work. Places like that will probably survive because it is attached to a hotel chain.

Quite so VanIsle, I don’t think fast food places are going anywhere, they will do just fine. Besides, HST will hardly apply to fast food alone, it will apply to all the restaurants. So I don’t see how fast food outlets are at a competitive disadvantage here.