Well, quit figuring that way because you're wrong.
Remember you're not a judge. An idiot not a judge.
No. I've never had a thought in my life. :roll:
I know that's why I said it.
Good. I hope no-one is disputing that alcohol in breast milk can be harmful, either.
Ah so you have conclusive clinical evidence to back that up do you? And here you call me the type to skim over things. Nothing like a hypocrite are you?
No more rude than you, Dude. And I do show respect for people here. If you haven't seen any it's probably because you have no idea what it is.
There you are correct. You're weak ass snot is light weight here.
To point it in your terms, "whatever".
Think for yourself Annie.
Oh, well. I am soooo crushed.:roll:
And soooo sincere. :roll:
If it was sincere I would accept that and let it go. You're a two faced scumbag.
And you aren't very good at reading. Wrong field of study. But, yes I hated history. Anthropology isn't history. There is physical anthro and cultural anthro.
heh heh heh This just cracks me up. My bad, you're no archaeologist. Maybe it's just the anthropology you do, that has nothing to do with history. :sign5:
How about that.Perhaps they investigated that further. It doesn't say in the news item.
Are you blond or something?
Look back, UF, and you'll notice I apologized for all that. I also accepted that I was confusing fetus' and babies in a reply to Karrie's post.
Hey newb, revisit re: sincerity/lack of/gfys. Get that together and come back and see me.
How very gracious of you to keep bringing it up like old puke.
Now I'm not sure how things work in your house, but once anything becomes puke the first time, it's gone. Now maybe in the Gilbert house, puke is kept around for anthropological purposes but I assure you, "Old Puke", your recurrence is strictly your own doing.
Police following procedure is not relevant to you I see. Hey Pot, there is a reason people call you Dope.:roll:
The point is that the cops thought she was acting irresponsibly and neglectful in feeding her child while drunk.
People make mistakes. Do you suppose there intent to harm the baby when she tried to breast feed? Was the baby injured at all? Remember they did take the baby to the hospital. IF there was some harm done it would be in the police report or mentioned in an attachment. Nada.
Whether charges stuck or not is irrelevant, it may have been the cops' intention just to scare her from doing it again.
I am sure they scared her. To the point she pleaded guilty so she could be released from the drunk tank and get her baby back and go home.
But that isn't the intent. She faces five years in jail and that would mean that she would loss her kid. That's a steep price to pay for poor judgment while intoxicated.
Is it your position that anyone who makes a mistake raising children should be arrested, charged with these types of charges, jailed and lose their kids?
"Our officers handle it so much that it is pretty much a general knowledge thing to know when someone is intoxicated. It's pretty obvious."
So there is no need for Breathalyzer tests or blood tests for DUI anymore? Ridiculous! Police just like everyone else and subject to all the same pressures and influences everyone else is. Mistakes happen and are part of being human. This is why there are tests that rarely if ever fail when administered properly.
So much for being just my opinion. Look, Having a husband who's a firefighter makes the opportunity to know cops quite a bit higher than Jane Doe, average citizen. So, no, it isn't my "field work experience" or my "mommy" experience. It's a wife experience. So what?
Good God, you're thick. That "experience" and $4 will get you a cup of coffee in Toronto. You're so busy frothing away here you don't even know what your responding to. I said it was my opinion that you watch too much TV. That you seem to think the because Les is a Fireman that you more police than someone else, and that this gives you more expertise on the subject of Law, is staggering.
I've seen some opinionated and less than intelligent old biddies come down the pike in my time but Jesus lady, you don't have to vie for the top job while still so fresh off the boat. :roll:
Speaking of jumping to conclusions, Mr. Pot......
I guess you missed a previous post of mine where I had stated what I would do, given that I were the judge.
I have to admit that you've said so many stupid things so far that I may have simply blocked it out. I am seriously thankful that you are not and never will be a judge in any capacity that would have any bearing on anyone.
But then, you seem like the type to skim over what doesn't jive with your opinion and stick your finger in the icing of what does support you.
Well it's true you know, when someone posts something irrelevant to the subject matter as proof of something, and tacks on a snide comment, I generally discard it once I determine that it's nothing to do with the points I've raised.
She is hardly a naive young lady. The cops had a record on her from before, according to the news item. But I guess that is another part you bypassed because it didn't';t fit with your interpretation.
You see, this is where you trip yourself up. Having a record is indicative of being naive. If you did know any police that taught you anything about the police and investigation, you would know the very first thing anyone does with the police is to lawyer up.
Naive people talk to the police without a lawyer present, sign confessions to get out of jail and allow themselves to be intimidated by the police. Not only that, but you show here that you stand on what is said in the news and oped articles while disregard the police report. So much for you're experience.